Adam Rayner is a ..........

c*nt.
Sorry for the bad language but it is warranted IMHO.
Today, surfing the airwaves I caught a few minutes of that awful JV lunchtime show on R2. The piece was about peds crossing roads whilst listening to music with headphones on using i-pods, mobiles, etc causing drivers to have to slow down or stop. The programme had invited the c*nt Adam Rayner to speak as some sort of "motoring" authority, why I don't know as we all know he's an ar$e. Anyway taking a few minutes to rant about these peds, he then launches into cyclists calling us "arrogant no regard whatsoever etc" and that he tries to run cyclists down squashing then under the wheels of his car, to which the idiot JV says "Good point". WTF!!!!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio2/shows/jeremy-vine/
So the purpose of my post is to get as many of you to complain to the BBC about this moron Adam Rayner as possible and also Jeremy Vine for endorsing such reckless and dangerous behaviour. The BBC has guidelines as to what constitutes acceptable comment and behaviour and in this instance Adam Rayner's remarks were totally unacceptable and those of Jeremy Vine. They certainly did not promote a general impression of road safety.
I would urge you to listen to the programme on BBC i -player listen again. It's the last half hour of the show so 90 minutes in and the actual offensive remarks against cyclists by c*nt Adam Rayner must have occurred at about 1 hour 40 minutes in.
Please please listen to it and complain to the BBC as the BBC seems to have a policy that actively encourages hatred to cyclists and motorists to run us down and selects guests that support this view. Adam Rayner is a nasty piece of work who has form with his recent rant on Breakfast TV about cyclists and so does the Jeremy Vine show who has form himself. Surely the producer and editor of the show could not be unaware of the cyclists that have been recently killed on the roads.
Sorry for the bad language but it is warranted IMHO.
Today, surfing the airwaves I caught a few minutes of that awful JV lunchtime show on R2. The piece was about peds crossing roads whilst listening to music with headphones on using i-pods, mobiles, etc causing drivers to have to slow down or stop. The programme had invited the c*nt Adam Rayner to speak as some sort of "motoring" authority, why I don't know as we all know he's an ar$e. Anyway taking a few minutes to rant about these peds, he then launches into cyclists calling us "arrogant no regard whatsoever etc" and that he tries to run cyclists down squashing then under the wheels of his car, to which the idiot JV says "Good point". WTF!!!!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio2/shows/jeremy-vine/
So the purpose of my post is to get as many of you to complain to the BBC about this moron Adam Rayner as possible and also Jeremy Vine for endorsing such reckless and dangerous behaviour. The BBC has guidelines as to what constitutes acceptable comment and behaviour and in this instance Adam Rayner's remarks were totally unacceptable and those of Jeremy Vine. They certainly did not promote a general impression of road safety.
I would urge you to listen to the programme on BBC i -player listen again. It's the last half hour of the show so 90 minutes in and the actual offensive remarks against cyclists by c*nt Adam Rayner must have occurred at about 1 hour 40 minutes in.
Please please listen to it and complain to the BBC as the BBC seems to have a policy that actively encourages hatred to cyclists and motorists to run us down and selects guests that support this view. Adam Rayner is a nasty piece of work who has form with his recent rant on Breakfast TV about cyclists and so does the Jeremy Vine show who has form himself. Surely the producer and editor of the show could not be unaware of the cyclists that have been recently killed on the roads.
Life is like a roll of toilet paper; long and useful, but always ends at the wrong moment. Anon.
Think how stupid the average person is.......
half of them are even more stupid than you first thought.
Think how stupid the average person is.......
half of them are even more stupid than you first thought.
0
Posts
I am off for a listen now and will complain, anyway as he has overtaken James Martin as No.1 hate figure IMHO
you can email in though !
Hopefully me because the fat fecker won't get up after.
Anyway, if he does carry on like that he'll soon pick on the wrong person.
Given Adam Rayner IS a moron, but the people to now go for are the producers and editors at the BBC as it has now gone well beyond a joke and certainly outside acceptable standards and policies that the BBC is supposed to adhere to. How can they endorse or give air time to such an igorant moron who encourages one group of road users ie vehicle drivers or gives the impression that it is acceptable for them to run down other vulnerable road users such as cycliists? How can the BBC defend this? Their current position is untenable IMHO.
Think how stupid the average person is.......
half of them are even more stupid than you first thought.
or Jeremy Vine for endorsing that view?
Does Adam Rayner write for the Top Gear magazine which is owned by the BBC? If so then - Your fired. Clear your desk and don't nick any stationary. Security escort him off the premises.
Jeremy Vine - here is your P45.
Think how stupid the average person is.......
half of them are even more stupid than you first thought.
By the same reasoning, if I ever see that fat cnut I'm going to cut off his c0ck and shove it up his @r$e. Then I'm going to get really nasty and do something even more unpleasant, something I can't even think of yet, it's so bad.
Saying you'll do something and actually doing it are very different things. However, it's the largely illiterate impressionable muppets that believe this kind of drivel that go on to run down cyclists.
Im saying that I dont hope that he gets gangrene in his leg after they cut his foot off due to diabetes.
What are you waiting for?
I agree with NapD - he doesn't quite say that - but it is pretty close and still worth a complaint - which I have now done. The Rayner rant starts at about 1hr 38 - his reference to cyclists is at about 1hr 41 (after Matthew and son).
-Spider-
Seconed. He doesn't directly say it but the way he implied that only the law was retaining him from mowing cyclists down wasn't very bright, because of course, anyone travelling in any other way than a car should be looked down upon. We have radio 2 on in the office every day and JV is disagreeing with guests the majority of the time, so to act like a penis and agree in the way he did is pathetic and childish for someone with his type of show. They both deserve the complaints they receive, though I doubt anything would be done about it.
My Blog: http://ipluswheels.wordpress.com/
Don't worry, though. As long as he's still capable of walking, he will step out of line eventually. Cyclists will be waiting.
I'm sure the OP would never massage the facts to suit an argument, you must be wrong!
it's a hard life if you don't weaken.
+1
While it does seem that he thinks that having to actually pay attention to where they're going is an unafir burden on drivers he doesn't actually advocate running down cyclists in that program.
Hadn't heard that program before and it sounds like Vine is more Daily Mail than BBC- disappointing.
Hitting him is useless. The mass of fat which covers his body will absorb the blow and you... in one. You will then forever be stuck in the dire world of Adam Rayner.
The best tactics i think would be to catch him off balance and roll him over a cliff face. Even then i'd say there's a 50% chance he'd bounce back up the 40 or so feet, land on you and as above absorb you into his mass.
Why do the BBC persist in giving this farm animal air time?
And personally I don't think there's much to complain about, he seemed to more concerened about peds looking where they're going, I must say I agree with him. Cyclists arrogant? well if you wander around London and look at the cycling skills on display I tend to agree again.
Garryc, he's the new James Martin. http://www.bikeradar.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12751528
Prat.
Think how stupid the average person is.......
half of them are even more stupid than you first thought.
The issues he discusses, rather sensationally and poorly, more than likely affect cyclists as much as they do car drivers in towns and cities where there are obviously a lot more people. However his reference to cyclists and cycling was irrelevant to what was being discussed. It did not contribute to road safety either generally for pedestrians or any other road user let alone for cyclists. He yet again referred to cyclists to try to further hatred towards us. He is a huge fat petrol head who doesn't go anywhere unless it is in a car and has no idea how vulnerable cyclists are on the roads or the sharp rise in the numbers of cyclists who have recently been killed by being struck by vehicles. His words are ill judged and inflammtory. Being a so called "motoring expert" regularly given a platform by the BBC to speak he should take a more responsible, considered and mature viewpoint. I should imagine that the BBC also has obligations under it's Charter not to promote inaccurate, intolerant and offensive views. In this instance Adam Rayner does not appreciate that by far the largest proportion of road users are cars and other motor vehicles and therefore the drivers of these have to drive prudently and responsibly for the safety of all who use the roads other vehicle drivers, pedestrians crossing the roads or other vulnerable road users such cyclists who also have every right to be on the roads. Approximately 3000 people are killed on the roads each year and by far the greatest cause is error, excessive speed or aggression on the part of drivers.
Think how stupid the average person is.......
half of them are even more stupid than you first thought.
Good point. He has trivialised a serious issue
He is basically arguing against JV's assumption that because someone puts on Headphones they are choosing to risk their life by saying he still has a responsibility NOT to crush cyclists under his wheels regardless of how aroogant etc they are.
No doubt the guys does not like cyclists from previous posts and he is fat, but in this case, nothing to complain about to be honest.
In fact he could be applauded for saying he maintains a responsibility to protect cyclists regardless of their approach to the road......
Having now had a chance to listen in full yesterday without distractions I'm of the same opinion.
However I will temper that with my view that people still have the right to complain about his previous rants on the BBC etc to Offcom. Rayner has perhaps upset people enough now that they will now read into what ever he says as a negative.