L3, L4 ... zones ... ? Explanation please?

Right newby-can't-be-arsed-googling Q here but anyway ....
I've heard talk of L3 and L4 and zones 1 and 2 - are these referring to the same thing, and if so, what is it?
Are they lengths of ride? or intensity of effort / power output?
I've heard talk of L3 and L4 and zones 1 and 2 - are these referring to the same thing, and if so, what is it?
Are they lengths of ride? or intensity of effort / power output?
0
Posts
I used to buy a weekly pass for zones 1 & 2 when I lived down there years ago!
the levels blend together in a continnuum. the borders are hard to pin down and they are slightly different for everyone.
here is what happens at [ and around ] each level.
http://www.bikeradar.com/fitness/articl ... sics-28838
Dex.
The terms zones and levels are often interchanged. I am always told to do my rides in zone 3 or 4, etc - and these ARE power zones.
Possibly not correct - but still used.
That article was a revelation to me. Thanks.
Fast and Bulbous
Peregrinations
Eddingtons: 80 (Metric); 60 (Imperial)
Trek EX8
Handsome Dog XC01 with added ebay specials
That's not crazy stuff. FTP (functional power threshold) is power you can put out for 1 hour. For 20 minutes you should be able to ride at 108% and 150% for 5 minutes (that will hurt though) . Most training regimes use zone or levels to band the power levels (eg Coogan), and of course they are individual based upon FTP.
http://cjwoods.com/london2paris
Scott Scale 10
Focus Izalco Team
Read about zones here: http://www.joefrielsblog.com/2010/07/sh ... agree.html
100% FTP (which isn't your maximum, hence you can exceed 100% of your FTP)
I can't do either. There's no reason why I should be able to though since we're all different.
My 5 minute power is only around 130% FTP.
Did you know you just dug up a thread which is nearly 8 years old..?
#knowledgeispower
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honour
Has been catching up on all the old threads he has missed out on since his last ban.
Who?
#intrigued
De Sisti wrote:
This is one of the silliest threads I've come across.
Recognition at last Matthew, well done!, a justified honour