bib or shorts
nutter772
Posts: 5
i have recently started cycling and looking for padded shorts but is it worth paying the extra for a bib or is there no difference from shorts?
thanks
lewis
thanks
lewis
0
Comments
-
Always bib - otherwise they need to be tight around your Tum to stayup.0
-
I use both &, I've just realised, have no preference.
My non-bibs stay up just fine (and they look less like a Freddie Mercury lookalike) and are fractionally more comfortable off the bike and fractionally cooler.ROAD < Scott Foil HMX Di2, Volagi Liscio Di2, Jamis Renegade Elite Di2, Cube Reaction Race > ROUGH0 -
-
+1 for bibs0
-
Either for me. No real preference. Though I tend to buy bibs more, it's not because of preference.0
-
Bibs all the way. Much better than shorts.0
-
Bibs are so much better than shorts, they keep the love handles warm when it's a bit chilly.
Used to wear shorts but never again.0 -
always bibs for me ...0
-
Bibs. Always. Nuff said.0
-
Definitely bibs for me - much more comfortable, particularly around the waist and with breathing - no elasticated waistband.
Peter0 -
don't want to make a new thread, yet don't want to thread jack, although I do have a related question...
I'm a pretty big dude...5'11", 260 lbs, and I read somewhere that bibs are better for those of us with "protruding stomachs", than shorts. Can someone confirm/deny this, hopefully by experience?0 -
1stGenRex wrote:don't want to make a new thread, yet don't want to thread jack, although I do have a related question...
I'm a pretty big dude...5'11", 260 lbs, and I read somewhere that bibs are better for those of us with "protruding stomachs", than shorts. Can someone confirm/deny this, hopefully by experience?
I think you may need a man-girdle.....sorry, bib shorts ain't holdin' you in matey.0 -
I have both and can't say I notice any difference once I am on a ride. Overall I would probably go with a decent pair of shorts. Less hassle when you need a pee too.0
-
bibs are always better on a bike, better round the front and doesnt "ride" down on the back.
more hassle when it comes to toilet breaks
skin suits are the way to go though0 -
bibs, bibs, and more bibs -- OP surely the most conclusive thread of the year so far?0
-
oooh.. I think i might vote for....... BIBS! yes thats right, i remember now..:)0
-
Started with shorts then tried Bib shorts-will never go back to shorts. Bibs are just so much more comfy.0
-
tri-sexual wrote:bibs are always better on a bike, better round the front and doesnt "ride" down on the back.
more hassle when it comes to toilet breaks
skin suits are the way to go though
Skin suits are not good for general riding unless on a short distance, no pockets to keep bits and pieces and a real hassle going to the toilet. I can't see any advantage in using one for training rides. Another for bibs here, they stay where they should be.0 -
yep, bibs
with shorts you get a gap occuring between the top of the short and the bottom of your jersey, cold and unsightly
also the bibs help keep the padding in the same place when you stand up and sit down again"I get paid to make other people suffer on my wheel, how good is that"
--Jens Voight0 -
bibsScience adjusts it’s beliefs based on what’s observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved0 -
Definitely bibshorts. Superior in every way. Once you've tried them, the question will be a non-issue. The very idea of wearing shorts that aren't connected to my shoulders, so that everything isn't nicely stretched out when crouching down into the drops, actually makes me slightly uncomfortable, like the idea of nails being dragged down a blackboard....0
-
dmclite wrote:1stGenRex wrote:don't want to make a new thread, yet don't want to thread jack, although I do have a related question...
I'm a pretty big dude...5'11", 260 lbs, and I read somewhere that bibs are better for those of us with "protruding stomachs", than shorts. Can someone confirm/deny this, hopefully by experience?
I think you may need a man-girdle.....sorry, bib shorts ain't holdin' you in matey.
not really asking for that purpose, but I would imagine the bib would move around less...0