Gary Mason knocked off bike & killed

Pufftmw

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-12135980

Drayk

Makes you think twice doesnt it.

RIP

mybreakfastconsisted

Shouldn't show those photos, horrible.

Drayk

Photos? There's only one, and its hardly horrible, its just a bike.
I dont think a news site would have a horrible picture on their site.


Ill take it off if then youre offended.

SimonAH

RIP

jonny_trousers

Horrible! Poor bloke

bigmat

RIP - a great champion, he'd be world level against today's heavies.

EDIT: What I meant to say was he was world level, if he was fighting today I'm pretty sure he'd have picked up a world title.

rjsterry

I know next to nothing about boxing, but that one is a little too close to home - just off my 'out to the hills' route. RIP.

Herbie The Dog

I used to know Gary Mason when he used my uncle's restaurant in Maidstone. A real gentle giant.

He sauntered into the restaurant kitchen once, grabbed a three foot baguette, sliced it open and filled it with whatever was at hand. Then wolfed the lot.

A true gent and a great talent who's career was cut short due to a detached retina. He had all the makings of a world champ.

RIP mate. Truly shocked when I saw the story on the Beeb this morning.

BigJimmyB

RIP Gary

mese13

awful news - RIP big man

AndyRubio

Looks like a quiet road with speed bumps, not much going on you'd think: http://bit.ly/hcreAq (Google Maps streetview). Still, van vs bike is always going to have one winner.

mybreakfastconsisted

Cyclists 'left unprotected by police and courts'

Drivers who claim they couldn't see bikes are too often believed, say campaigners

Greater protection for cyclists on Britain's roads is being demanded after a former British heavyweight boxing champion was killed on his bicycle last week. Gary Mason, 48, died after a collision with a van while cycling in Wallington, south London. He is the second cyclist to die in the UK this year.

One leading barrister has criticised police, judges and prosecutors for failing to give greater legal safeguards to cyclists. Martin Porter QC said prosecutors need to be "more imaginative" when it comes to charging drivers involved in fatal and near-fatal accidents.

Mr Porter said: "The excuses of not seeing cyclists seem to be too readily accepted by the police and the CPS so there isn't a prosecution when there should be. Judges should be handing down stiffer sentences and prosecutors should be more ambitious in the choice of charges and the decision to prosecute," he said yesterday.

"It's up to a judge and a jury to accept whether an excuse is good enough. It is not good enough to go into a space not knowing what is there. It's all part of the car culture that doesn't expect the motorist to foresee that the road might be occupied by a cyclist. That needs to change."

The most recent Department for Transport (DfT) statistics show that the number of those hurt, as a proportion of total miles cycled, went up by 1 per cent between 2008 and 2009. The total number of casualties rose 5 per cent in the same period. While deaths dropped from 115 to 105 in 2008-09, cyclists seriously injured rose from 2,450 to 2,606.

The UK's national cyclists' organisation, the Cyclists' Touring Club (CTC), said that more protection was necessary if the increase in people using two wheels since 1994, when casualty records began, is to be continued.

Debra Rolfe, the campaign co-ordinator for CTC, said: "We don't think the law does enough to protect cyclists. There are a lot of areas where the law frequently does let down cyclists – whether at the level of the police failing to collect enough evidence to the CPS not prosecuting or the courts often convicting to a lesser offence.

"This needs to change because it's becoming clear that cycling is the answer to many of society's ills – whether that be climate change, obesity or improving busy roads. Cyclists need to be treated like they belong on the roads."

Mr Porter, himself a cyclist, was recently assaulted while on his bike by a motorist and threatened by another. He said he believed that some judges are frustrated by a lack of sentencing power when they are dealing with motorists.

"One judge was frustrated by the limit of two years as a maximum sentence for dangerous driving in the case where a motorist had deliberately driven into a cyclist," said Mr Porter. "Prosecutors could have been more imaginative in the charges they have brought because they could have prosecuted for assault occasioning actual bodily harm, in which case the judge would have had the ability to sentence for up to five years rather than up to two years for dangerous driving."

Eilidh Cairns was crushed by a lorry in Notting Hill, west London, while cycling to work in February last year. The driver subsequently pleaded guilty to having defective eyesight. He was fined just £200 and given three points on his licence.

Emma Chesterman, a friend of Ms Cairns, said: "He admitted his eyesight was not good enough and gets £200 and three points on his licence. It does not seem fair. We are bewildered by the whole system that treats cyclists' deaths in this way. It seems to be the attitude that you are putting yourself in the way of danger and therefore it is your own fault if it happens to you, which is not the same as if it were a pedestrian killed."

The Department for Transport denied that cyclists are insufficiently protected. "We take road safety extremely seriously and are working to improve safety for cyclists in a number of ways. The number of cyclists killed or seriously injured on the roads each year has fallen by 31 per cent since the mid-1990s. We are investing in the provision of cycle training and planning to encourage local authorities to introduce more 20 mph zones in residential areas and around schools."



http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/ho ... 79752.html

Harveytile

Firstly: RIP. Terrible, just terrible.

Secondly:

AndyRubio wrote:

Looks like a quiet road with speed bumps, not much going on you'd think: http://bit.ly/hcreAq (Google Maps streetview). Still, van vs bike is always going to have one winner.

:roll: Anyone who has used that section of raod knows it is a crap junction where roadusers take liberties in turning and joining Woodcote. As a cyclist it's never been a plesant experience.

cjcp

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/ ... yclists.do