Santa Cruz's new 29er hardtail
Dick Scruttock
Posts: 2,533
As above, pictures from Santa Cruz blog:
WANT.
WANT.
0
Comments
-
now, that looks nice.0
-
-
It is nice but i think If I was going to spend that much I would go for the Niner Air 9 carbon with their rigis forks 8) 8)Niner Air 9 Rigid
Whyte 129S 29er.0 -
scale20 wrote:It is nice but i think If I was going to spend that much I would go for the Niner Air 9 carbon with their rigis forks 8) 8)0
-
ha ha, nah I wish, just dreaming there, one day!Niner Air 9 Rigid
Whyte 129S 29er.0 -
I dear, I got a little confused to say the least. First time round I thought you meant you had one. Re-read it and I get it now. Stupid me :roll:0
-
Nice, but doesn't raise the lust factor like the Niner.0
-
yeehaamcgee wrote:scale20 wrote:It is nice but i think If I was going to spend that much I would go for the Niner Air 9 carbon with their rigis forks 8) 8)0
-
Not to mention being loads of funUncompromising extremist0
-
getonyourbike wrote:I'm a hippy luddite0
-
getonyourbike wrote:rigid forks make sense with a 29er as its apparently similair to a 100mm full suss 26er. They also drop a chunk of weight off compared to suspension forks.
you have got to be joking, how on earth could that feel like a 100mm fork on a 26er?0 -
he's not joking, he's delusional.0
-
well, i have prefered a 29er chameleon.......
i don't have riden until now a 29er, but friends say that a full rigid steel 29er feels like a 80 mm double suspension on 26er...0 -
I've been quite enjoying running rigid forks lately. Got them mainly to save on cleaning time over the winter (yes, and running singlespeed, I'm a cliche!), but I think they might stay in use far longer into the nice weather than planned. I was surprised how effective the 'run a big tyre soft' thing actually is, so I imagine it can only be more so on a 29er.Rock Lobster 853, Trek 1200 and a very old, tired and loved Apollo Javelin.0
-
I've been running a rigid mtb lately with a 2.5 front tyre and it's nothing at all like having suspension. But it's still ace. Everyone who's ever complained that their local trail is too easy or trail centres are too sanitised should think about getting a rigid fork, it's a device for making riding unneccesarily difficult.
It's a natural match for a bigwheel since niches like to flock together. Go singlespeed while you're at it.Uncompromising extremist0 -
I'd agree, it doesn't feel like a suspension fork, just less bumpy than I'd expected! I've been amazed how much more you start to automatically flex your arms to absorb things. Still getting pretty badly rattled in some places though!Rock Lobster 853, Trek 1200 and a very old, tired and loved Apollo Javelin.0
-
Northwind wrote:I've been running a rigid mtb lately with a 2.5 front tyre and it's nothing at all like having suspension.
That's missing the 29er part of the equation though. Larger wheel will roll over small depressions rather than entering them and the different angle that you hit smaller obstructions at will take away some of the "bump". It doesn't feel the same as suspension, but rigid 29er makes more sense than rigid 26er IMHO.
It's obviously not a great idea if you're pummelling over rocks, but not a totally insane idea for relatively smooth long distance XC type rides.0 -
As someone who rode rigids for some 24 years both in 26 and 24 inch wheels, I always found of the two the 24 my favourite. Something to do with the way it would turn on a pin.
For using a 29er with rigid forks just to run smoother trails, I would rather go for a CX with discs and a set of top levers to hum along the trails even faster.
Mind you Geoff Apps has always been convinced by the 29er he built his first back in 1981 but then switched to 650B's for production, recently he's built a new 29er, which rolls pretty fast downhill which I can attest to as he was on my tail.Now where's that "Get Out of Crash Free Card"0 -
Just converted my On One 29er to rigid and finished the Gorrick Brass Monkey ( N.o 4295). Exotic carbon forks, pretty impressed, my arms weren't as tired as I 'd thought they would get and it handled the bombs, roots etc with ease. A bit twitchey on some corners, I think the forks are a bit to long for the job, they are equivalent to a 100mm travel set up, but I will stick with them definitely.Don't think, BE:0
-
Northwind wrote:it's a device for making riding unneccesarily difficult.
It's a natural match for a bigwheel since niches like to flock together. Go singlespeed while you're at it.
agree with all of this.0 -
yeehaamcgee wrote:robertpb wrote:I would rather go for a CX
It's like when people start a sentence by saying "I'm not racist or owt, but..."
But I would still ride it with 5.10's on.Now where's that "Get Out of Crash Free Card"0 -
I love how the blog boasts about the bike weighing 20lbs 9oz with heavy risers, tyres and tubes. It's got bloody full XX and EDGE rims on what looks like DT 240s hubs! And those heavy tyres are maxxis exceptions, hardly lardy tyres. The best bit is the way that the photo is sneakily taken so the ends of the crank arms are hidden from sight, obviously not weighed with pedals. Can't see the logos on the bars but look like EC70's to me.
No doubt the geometry will be the usual Santa Cruz b*llocks.I had to beat them to death with their own shoes...
HiFi Pro Carbon '09
LTS DH '96
The Mighty Dyna-Sore - The 90's?0 -
yeehaamcgee wrote:getonyourbike wrote:I'm a hippy luddite
A case of pot calling the kettle black there Mr Flat PedalsI had to beat them to death with their own shoes...
HiFi Pro Carbon '09
LTS DH '96
The Mighty Dyna-Sore - The 90's?0