Does the front look a tad high to you ?
Pudseyp
Posts: 3,514
0
Comments
-
-
-
-
that ^ makes no sense... the stantions are longer than the lowers.
Its just got a stupidly tall fork height, which would probably better if it was the lowers that were longer0 -
The Northern Monkey wrote:that ^ makes no sense... the stantions are longer than the lowers.
Its just got a stupidly tall fork height, which would probably better if it was the lowers that were longer
You really think its gonna be ridden like that ? clown !
Its obviously a dual crown fork bolted to just a single crown.0 -
-
The Northern Monkey wrote:W00DENT0P
yes... so it makes no sense.
idiot.
Its obviously just been done for the pic as a bit of fun, i don't think its supposed to make sense, i'm sure most folk who see will see it as a joke, but obviously it confuses some idiots !0 -
EPIC FACEPALMThe Northern Monkey wrote:that ^ makes no sense... the stantions are longer than the lowers.
Dual crown forks generally have longer stanchions than lowers.
DUH0 -
It's for sale.....like thatW00DENT0P wrote:You really think its gonna be ridden like that ? clown !
Its obviously a dual crown fork bolted to just a single crown.
I generally ride canal towapaths with the odd trail centre and it just doesn't cut it so I need more travel up front.I'm thinking of going up to 900mm on my next project 0 -
Yes but it's a single crownyeehaamcgee wrote:EPIC FACEPALM
Dual crown forks generally have longer stanchions than lowers.
DUH 0 -
Wow, Josh Bender hucks in....Essex
You knew it was coming
0 -
The 24inch wheels also look ridiculous with the monster T's and 3" tyres.My Bikes And Me
A bicycle can't stand alone; it is two tired.0 -
MatelotFreddy wrote:I posted this last Christmas, and it seems to be appropriate again!
Saw this last Christmas Eve in Pompey High Street.
I remember seeing this pic before and looked for ages as I wanted to show it to someone, but I could not find it!
Quality picture though.0 -
