Cassette Advice XT or SRAM PG990
mikeyj28
Posts: 754
hi All
I do Xc riding and no downhill mad stuff at all.
Am i better off getting a SRAM PG990 Cassette 9sp or a Shimano XT cassette?
WOuld i also only be able to use a SRAM chain with the SRAM cassette or could i use a shimano chain?
I use SRAM X9 rear mech and a SRAM x7 front mech along with SRAM x9 shifters.
Your help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
I do Xc riding and no downhill mad stuff at all.
Am i better off getting a SRAM PG990 Cassette 9sp or a Shimano XT cassette?
WOuld i also only be able to use a SRAM chain with the SRAM cassette or could i use a shimano chain?
I use SRAM X9 rear mech and a SRAM x7 front mech along with SRAM x9 shifters.
Your help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Constantly trying to upgrade my parts.It is a long road ahead as things are so expensive for little gain. n+1 is always the principle in my mind.
0
Comments
-
XT Cassette and SRAM chain marry very well and the choice of many, including me.0
-
Same for me, XT cassette, SRAM chain. XT cassettes just seem stiffer and better made.0
-
Thanks guys. Maybe i am a bit of a tart but i really liked the colour combinations of the SRAM cassettes. Is the life of the SRAM cassette not that great in direct comparison?
Do shimano offer different colours or is it the boring same old? I have never seen different coloured XT cassettes.Constantly trying to upgrade my parts.It is a long road ahead as things are so expensive for little gain. n+1 is always the principle in my mind.0 -
You wont have as they don't make them.
Cassette wear has many variables. The main one being how often/what stage you change your chain.
As SS alludes, the XT one seems to be a bit stiffer all round, you wont go wrong with that SRAM cassette, just think overall value for money is better with the XT.0 -
Chunkers1980 wrote:You wont have as they don't make them.
Cassette wear has many variables. The main one being how often/what stage you change your chain.
As SS alludes, the XT one seems to be a bit stiffer all round, you wont go wrong with that SRAM cassette, just think overall value for money is better with the XT.
generally a chain change twice or maybe three times if excessive muddy conditions a year (in a year i do between 1500-2500 miles).
Thanks for the help. Think it will be an XT cassette on order.
Bit silly but standard is 11-34 isn't it? me being a bit thickConstantly trying to upgrade my parts.It is a long road ahead as things are so expensive for little gain. n+1 is always the principle in my mind.0 -
2 main 9spd standards 11-32 and 11-34. Depends what you ride/use and what rings you've got on the front. If a 22 granny then 32 is plenty and saves a few grams0
-
Might be worth checking out KMC chains too - highly rated by a lot of MTBersMy abundant supply of MTFU is reserved for use in dry, sunny conditions.0
-
Shimano XT imo is the best cassette out there. Significantly stronger than the SRAM cassettes (excluding XX). I have broken every SRAM cassette I have owned.
XT is also lighter and stiffer.
Only prob is it comes in one colour.
If you are a light guy who doesn't put much power in, then any cassette is OK, if a strong guy, the XT is IMO unbeatable.
The reverse on the chains.
Shimano/sram pinning sytems did not survive the transer to 9 speed well.
The exception in the mix is the 991 cross step (not regular 991, not hollow pin).
This is a strong pinning system and a great chain.
IMO the best chains are the X9 by KMC. They are unbreakable like the 991 cross step, but cheaper and wear slower.
So XT cassette, and X9 chain (the silver/gold get more rust resistant, as we live in the UK the gold is a good investment.)Why would I care about 150g of bike weight, I just ate 400g of cookies while reading this?0 -
cavegiant wrote:Shimano XT imo is the best cassette out there. Significantly stronger than the SRAM cassettes (excluding XX). I have broken every SRAM cassette I have owned.
If you are a light guy who doesn't put much power in, then any cassette is OK, if a strong guy, the XT is IMO unbeatable.
IMO the best chains are the X9 by KMC. They are unbreakable like the 991 cross step, but cheaper and wear slower.
So XT cassette, and X9 chain (the silver/gold get more rust resistant, as we live in the UK the gold is a good investment.)
How did you manage to break the SRAM cassette?
I am 11stone but have strong leg power for my weight.
How much am i looking at for a KMC gold plated chain?
Thanks for the adviceConstantly trying to upgrade my parts.It is a long road ahead as things are so expensive for little gain. n+1 is always the principle in my mind.0 -
cavegiant wrote:
IMO the best chains are the X9 by KMC. They are unbreakable like the 991 cross step, but cheaper and wear slower.
I broke one after 3 months use (yes it was lubed, removed, washed, tucked in at night ect ect)0 -
XTs are lighter and cheaper, I've not personally broken either (and have used both), but enough people seem to say the XTs are tougher that there's obviously truth in it!
If you're a tart and value colour over performance, buy the PG990, otherwise XT for my money.0 -
For my money, barring any other considerations, the xt just seems better made.Rock Lobster 853, Trek 1200 and a very old, tired and loved Apollo Javelin.0
-
Looks like the general consensus is with the XT.
I'll get the XT & also email Shimano pleading with them to have a different colour scheme like SRAM.
Quality over looks for me.
Thanks AllConstantly trying to upgrade my parts.It is a long road ahead as things are so expensive for little gain. n+1 is always the principle in my mind.0 -
dammit, I just bought a multipack...Why would I care about 150g of bike weight, I just ate 400g of cookies while reading this?0
-
Now that I find odd, as despite having never bent a cassette, I've snapped every X9SL chain I've used, and find they wear much more quickly than SRAM or Shimano chains. If I weighed 50% more I wouldn't entertain the idea of using them!0
-
weird, I have never broken any X9 (and have the SL), but broken every SRAM cassette.
What failed on the X9 was it the powerlink or elsewhere?Why would I care about 150g of bike weight, I just ate 400g of cookies while reading this?0 -
Wasn't a big fan of the X9SL, it's strong but just a bit delicate- even minor chainsuck twisted the plates on mine, which was a pain in the arse. Obviously any chain can get damaged but I've gone back to their cheaper X9-93 which has less cutouts in the chain and it's far more durable.Uncompromising extremist0
-
I get tons of chain suck too...
guess 29er chainsuck doesn't break them ;-)Why would I care about 150g of bike weight, I just ate 400g of cookies while reading this?0 -
It always straightened out, it was just a pain in the bum. 10 Under the Ben just destroyed any love I had for the thing, had to stop 3 times in one lap to unkink it. Fair enough though, it's weightweenie kit so you have to expect some weakness... Won't hold it against KMC, I just go for their stronger chains now.Uncompromising extremist0
-
killed a couple of sram cassettes rather quickly
shimnaoi slx best for money, xt best if your running a alloy freewheel body like a hope, dt swiss ect
i found the kmc chains to be terible, rust like hell, do not run smooth and very poor shifting.
sram chains are good all round had very few brakages., shift well and last ok.
shimano chains are the smoothest and best shifting but i have broke a few of these in the past, just fitted a new xt chain to my ht, it now runs smoother and the shifting is a lot crisper than the sram it replaced just hope it holds out and it dont brake anytime soon.
BUT they all die pretty fast if you dont keep an eye on chain streach esp if your a hard/heavy rider.0 -
came down to price for me - 990 was only 40quid at CRC - couldn't get an XT for that so ordered the SRAM0
-
sram 980,s are a good buy and be be found cheaply also weigh the same as the 990 although not as blingyViner Salviati
Shark Aero Pro
Px Ti Custom
Cougar 531
Sab single speed
Argon 18 E-112 TT
One-one Ti 456 Evo
Ridley Cheetah TT
Orange Clockwork 2007 ltd ed
Yeti ASR 5
Cove Hummer XC Ti0 -
weird, I have never broken any X9 (and have the SL), but broken every SRAM cassette.
What failed on the X9 was it the powerlink or elsewhere?
Do you mean cassette in this instance, or chain!?
I've broken several X9SLs, never on the PowerLink. They've all lasted a half reasonable amount of time, but IME SRAM or Shimano chains just go very rattly when worn, whilst X9SLs just snap.
Never broken a cassette, but broken countless chains, light riders can be powerful too after all...0 -
breaking chains is more likely to be due to poor shifting technique ;-)Why would I care about 150g of bike weight, I just ate 400g of cookies while reading this?0
-
Never break when shifting strangely. Broken a chainring too come to think of it. More that I can never be arsed to change them I suspect!0
-
Never snapped a chain in my life, i just let off the load slightly when shifting.0
-
I snapped an X9SL just recently - well half!! - was grinding up a steep climb too. bike wouldn't shift gear properly, stopped to have a look and a plate had snapped on one side of the chain, leaving it connected by one side of one link! - got me home though0
-
dammit, seems like I am the only one who has not broken an SL.
If I revise my advice to an 'L' will there be a list of peeps who have broken them too, or is it a safer option?
P xWhy would I care about 150g of bike weight, I just ate 400g of cookies while reading this?0