The nation is skint yet...
Cressers
Posts: 1,329
...money can still be found for this...
http://www.chichester.co.uk/news/nation ... _1_1765294
What part of austerity do they not understand?
http://www.chichester.co.uk/news/nation ... _1_1765294
What part of austerity do they not understand?
0
Comments
-
Us little hamsters have got to keep that wheel spinning as fast as we can or we might get left behind.
Super duper fast broadband is just another thing that we can't live without despite the fact everybody did for 99.999999999% of the time humans have walked the earth.0 -
Isn't it so we can all claim our benefits in one click in the blink of an eye. The revolution is buffering.The dissenter is every human being at those moments of his life when he resigns
momentarily from the herd and thinks for himself.0 -
It will improve workers' productivity, as faster broadband means time spent surfing the internet during work hours is reduced, thus allowing people more time to do their job. Theoretically, anyhow.0
-
could be a prudent move,
for the internet of today read railways and motorway of recent history. UK cant afford to be at the end of the queue for what is probably just the start of the technology revolution for the next 20+ years0 -
It's investment in infrastructure - stop that and we really will be up s**t creek.0
-
+1 to Pross and northernneil.
Besides, we don't want to be worse than the French at something else, do we?0 -
The money is coming from the tv licence fee or something, apparently.Smarter than the average bear.0
-
antfly wrote:The money is coming from the tv licence fee or something, apparently.
As I understand it, this government initiative is to provide superfast broadband to all areas. The problem at the moment is that the likes of BT, Virgin Media etc, are putting infrastructure in to the areas where it is worth while them doing so. Other rural areas aren't covered supported, therefore this project is to fill in the gaps.Science adjusts it’s beliefs based on what’s observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved0 -
I live in a small hamlet of 18 houses and the fastest broadband I can get is 512kps! My wife wished to work from home but cannot due to the limited broadband. So she spends £ 30 a day travelling to her office and back.
A nearish village went to expense of installing a private satellite broadband system. I believe it currently costs each user £ 80 per month to cover the infrastructure and useage costs.
It would not be a waste of time or money from our perspective.0 -
I agree with the arguments from a pure economics perspective but I was thinking from a more bigger picture (arguably idealistic) stand point.0
-
Makes sense to me. We cant afford to be left behind with technology !0
-
MattC59 wrote:antfly wrote:The money is coming from the tv licence fee or something, apparently.
As I understand it, this government initiative is to provide superfast broadband to all areas. The problem at the moment is that the likes of BT, Virgin Media etc, are putting infrastructure in to the areas where it is worth while them doing so. Other rural areas aren't covered supported, therefore this project is to fill in the gaps.
Would have been done years ago by BT if the government had not forced them to give up broadband to other telecommunications companies so they wouldn't have the monopoly on it.
A bit childish but understandable I'd say."A cyclist has nothing to lose but his chain"
PTP Runner Up 20150 -
Cressers, it's what's known as investment. It's similar to the kind of thing Rooservelt did in the 30s that got the US out of the mire of the Depression.0
-
iceland banks and property were also known as investment'0
-
Why ponce off the BBC licence fee? The govt should oblige the private telcos to provide a universal service as aprecondition of their licencing agreement.0
-
Hhmmm, so we can't have an aircraft carrier, but we can upgrade broadband, so people can watch bigger better porn. Great.0