Lessons Learned Recently
spen666
Posts: 17,709
1. Do not criticise anything a QC does as they are very sensitive creatures and can't accept they may not be perfect.
Criticism is likely to see them flounce off as they have not got time to waste here -but may have time to waste elsewhere.
In future all must bow down and worship at the feet of QCs and never question their decision
2. Don't eat yellow snow
3. Don't..... if you do, it will be made illegal
Criticism is likely to see them flounce off as they have not got time to waste here -but may have time to waste elsewhere.
In future all must bow down and worship at the feet of QCs and never question their decision
2. Don't eat yellow snow
3. Don't..... if you do, it will be made illegal
Want to know the Spen666 behind the posts?
Then read MY BLOG @ http://www.pebennett.com
Twittering @spen_666
Then read MY BLOG @ http://www.pebennett.com
Twittering @spen_666
0
Comments
-
-
Baiting headcam warriors is endless entertainment though.
Remember kids
0 -
UndercoverElephant wrote:1) Urinal mints aren't as tasty as they sound.
They sound tasty to you :? :shock: :?
Yes. I do understand it was supposed to be a joke.None of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.0 -
-
Rick Chasey wrote:QC?
quintessential cnutLe Cannon [98 Cannondale M400] [FCN: 8]
The Mad Monkey [2013 Hoy 003] [FCN: 4]0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:QC?
a barrister, QC stands for Queen's counsel - also known as a "silk"0 -
-
spen666 wrote:Do not criticise anything a QC does as they are very sensitive creatures and can't accept they may not be perfect.
Questions to annoy a solicitor
1 How can you defend someone who is guilty?
2 Would you not like to be promoted to Barrister?“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0 -
TailWindHome wrote:Questions to annoy a solicitor
1 How can you defend someone who is guilty?
2 Would you not like to be promoted to Barrister?
I've always used to have a massive problem with this.
A person whose name has fecked off out of my head (he has defended more than a few put it brilliantly and I will now paraphrase...
For the court process to work and the guilty found guilty - even a blatantly (100's of witnesses, confessed etc) guilty person needs the best defence he can get because (hopefully) when the guy goes down he (defence) can rightly say he defended him to the best of his ability and the law courts found him guilty. If he was to get a poor defence or some shoddy work, there would always be the doubt that he was guilty. The problem I have with and most others will likely agree is the ones who get them off on technicalities. "Gloves are too small" or "when arrested, the arresting officer said he mixed up the lines" That sort of person... well we can hope karma will sort them out.
make sense?Le Cannon [98 Cannondale M400] [FCN: 8]
The Mad Monkey [2013 Hoy 003] [FCN: 4]0 -
TailWindHome wrote:
Questions to annoy a solicitor
1 How can you defend someone who is guilty?
That's an easy one - "because it's easier than prosecuting someone you know to be innocent."
Oh, and if they tell you they're guilty, you can't mislead the court into believing that they aren't.0 -
It's 99% of lawyers that give the rest of them a bad name...FCN = 40