Lessons Learned Recently

spen666
spen666 Posts: 17,709
edited November 2010 in Commuting chat
1. Do not criticise anything a QC does as they are very sensitive creatures and can't accept they may not be perfect.

Criticism is likely to see them flounce off as they have not got time to waste here -but may have time to waste elsewhere.

In future all must bow down and worship at the feet of QCs and never question their decision

2. Don't eat yellow snow

3. Don't..... if you do, it will be made illegal
Want to know the Spen666 behind the posts?
Then read MY BLOG @ http://www.pebennett.com

Twittering @spen_666

Comments

  • 1) Urinal mints aren't as tasty as they sound.
  • Alphabet
    Alphabet Posts: 436
    Baiting headcam warriors is endless entertainment though.

    Remember kids

    serious.jpg
  • daviesee
    daviesee Posts: 6,386
    1) Urinal mints aren't as tasty as they sound.

    They sound tasty to you :? :shock: :?




    Yes. I do understand it was supposed to be a joke.
    None of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 72,738
    QC?
  • QC?

    quintessential cnut ;)
    Le Cannon [98 Cannondale M400] [FCN: 8]
    The Mad Monkey [2013 Hoy 003] [FCN: 4]
  • PBo
    PBo Posts: 2,493
    QC?

    a barrister, QC stands for Queen's counsel - also known as a "silk"
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 72,738
    As in Kavanagh...
  • tailwindhome
    tailwindhome Posts: 18,941
    spen666 wrote:
    Do not criticise anything a QC does as they are very sensitive creatures and can't accept they may not be perfect.

    Questions to annoy a solicitor

    1 How can you defend someone who is guilty?
    2 Would you not like to be promoted to Barrister?
    “New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!
  • Questions to annoy a solicitor

    1 How can you defend someone who is guilty?
    2 Would you not like to be promoted to Barrister?

    I've always used to have a massive problem with this.

    A person whose name has fecked off out of my head (he has defended more than a few put it brilliantly and I will now paraphrase...

    For the court process to work and the guilty found guilty - even a blatantly (100's of witnesses, confessed etc) guilty person needs the best defence he can get because (hopefully) when the guy goes down he (defence) can rightly say he defended him to the best of his ability and the law courts found him guilty. If he was to get a poor defence or some shoddy work, there would always be the doubt that he was guilty. The problem I have with and most others will likely agree is the ones who get them off on technicalities. "Gloves are too small" or "when arrested, the arresting officer said he mixed up the lines" That sort of person... well we can hope karma will sort them out.

    make sense?
    Le Cannon [98 Cannondale M400] [FCN: 8]
    The Mad Monkey [2013 Hoy 003] [FCN: 4]
  • W1
    W1 Posts: 2,636

    Questions to annoy a solicitor

    1 How can you defend someone who is guilty?

    That's an easy one - "because it's easier than prosecuting someone you know to be innocent."

    Oh, and if they tell you they're guilty, you can't mislead the court into believing that they aren't.
  • mtb-idle
    mtb-idle Posts: 2,179
    It's 99% of lawyers that give the rest of them a bad name...
    FCN = 4