Bradders at The Guardian
I just got this answer...
joeshmo. Hi Brad. I know you are a tour history aficionado. Who has been the best Tour rider to date bearing in mind the war effecting fausto and lemond's gun shot wounds etc etc
Reply: Eddy Merckx
Wonder why he didn't pick LA
joeshmo. Hi Brad. I know you are a tour history aficionado. Who has been the best Tour rider to date bearing in mind the war effecting fausto and lemond's gun shot wounds etc etc
Reply: Eddy Merckx
Wonder why he didn't pick LA
'Do not compare your bike to others, for always there will be greater and lesser bikes'
0
Comments
-
josame wrote:I just got this answer...
joeshmo. Hi Brad. I know you are a tour history aficionado. Who has been the best Tour rider to date bearing in mind the war effecting fausto and lemond's gun shot wounds etc etc
Reply: Eddy Merckx
Wonder why he didn't pick LA
Because Merckx was clearly better, perhaps. Even Armstrong doesn't think otherwise.Twitter: @RichN950 -
Yep I get that - Merckx walks if you take everything into account
But I only mentioned the tour'Do not compare your bike to others, for always there will be greater and lesser bikes'0 -
josame wrote:Yep I get that - Merckx walks if you take everything into account
But I only mentioned the tour
KOM twice (Armstrong didn't win it)
Points 3 times (Armstrong didn't win it)
34 stages (Armstrong: 22)
Merckx was a better Tour rider than Armstrong, overall.0 -
LA isn't even second IMO. Hinault won 5 overall, 1 mountains, 1 points and 28 stages.0
-
EKIMIKE wrote:LA isn't even second IMO. Hinault won 5 overall, 1 mountains, 1 points and 28 stages.
Bigger version
He stamps all over the Texan's "look", and they both know it. Lance isn't even third.
Aspire not to have more, but to be more.0