Bradders at The Guardian
I just got this answer...
joeshmo. Hi Brad. I know you are a tour history aficionado. Who has been the best Tour rider to date bearing in mind the war effecting fausto and lemond's gun shot wounds etc etc
Reply: Eddy Merckx
Wonder why he didn't pick LA
joeshmo. Hi Brad. I know you are a tour history aficionado. Who has been the best Tour rider to date bearing in mind the war effecting fausto and lemond's gun shot wounds etc etc
Reply: Eddy Merckx
Wonder why he didn't pick LA
'Do not compare your bike to others, for always there will be greater and lesser bikes'
0
Comments
-
josame wrote:I just got this answer...
joeshmo. Hi Brad. I know you are a tour history aficionado. Who has been the best Tour rider to date bearing in mind the war effecting fausto and lemond's gun shot wounds etc etc
Reply: Eddy Merckx
Wonder why he didn't pick LA
Because Merckx was clearly better, perhaps. Even Armstrong doesn't think otherwise.Twitter: @RichN950 -
Yep I get that - Merckx walks if you take everything into account
But I only mentioned the tour'Do not compare your bike to others, for always there will be greater and lesser bikes'0 -
josame wrote:Yep I get that - Merckx walks if you take everything into account
But I only mentioned the tour
KOM twice (Armstrong didn't win it)
Points 3 times (Armstrong didn't win it)
34 stages (Armstrong: 22)
Merckx was a better Tour rider than Armstrong, overall.0 -
LA isn't even second IMO. Hinault won 5 overall, 1 mountains, 1 points and 28 stages.0
-
EKIMIKE wrote:LA isn't even second IMO. Hinault won 5 overall, 1 mountains, 1 points and 28 stages.
Bigger version
He stamps all over the Texan's "look", and they both know it. Lance isn't even third.Aspire not to have more, but to be more.0