what is the minimum width for clincher tyres
celt1972
Posts: 26
Guys i am new to this, i have a trek 1.5 tripple and i a quite happy with it, but i am looking at making a few minor low cost upgrades to prepare for a few duathalons next year.
First change i thought i would go for narrower tyres, what would be the minimum width of clincher you could / should get.
Second potentially new wheels or good 2nd hand,any recommendations
Thirdly thought about changing the 50 tooth chain ring to a 52.53 . or change the back cassette to a ultegra 9 speed
Any views, particularily on the first 2 the third is a bit tenuous i know
Thanks
First change i thought i would go for narrower tyres, what would be the minimum width of clincher you could / should get.
Second potentially new wheels or good 2nd hand,any recommendations
Thirdly thought about changing the 50 tooth chain ring to a 52.53 . or change the back cassette to a ultegra 9 speed
Any views, particularily on the first 2 the third is a bit tenuous i know
Thanks
0
Comments
-
1) You can get 20c, but 23c is as narrow as the vast majority go.
2) Would need an idea of budget.
3) You could put a 52T chain ring on, but I believe you have an 11-26 cassette on the back? 50/11 should be high enough for any situation. You might want a closer-spaced cassette on the back, say 11-21.
If you haven't done so already, get some clipless pedals and shoes.Bike lover and part-time cyclist.0 -
Also for 3) I don't believe you will be able to bolt on a 53 tooth chainring as your chainset is most likely to be a compact with 110 BCD (bolt circumference diameter) whereas 53 chainrings are 130 BCD. I think you'd be ok with 52 though.0
-
weapons wrote:Also for 3) I don't believe you will be able to bolt on a 53 tooth chainring as your chainset is most likely to be a compact with 110 BCD (bolt circumference diameter) whereas 53 chainrings are 130 BCD. I think you'd be ok with 52 though.
You can get 53 tooth 110 bcd rings.More problems but still living....0 -
No, you could fit a 53T. Firstly, the BCD is 130/74, not 110 (that's a touring triple). Secondly, even if it was 110 BCD you can get compact 53T rings.
I still don't think it's necessary though. I've only spun out my top 52/12 combo a few times, and that was at about 45mph (big hill!). 50/11 is actually a higher gear.Bike lover and part-time cyclist.0 -
What's your rationale for the narrowest tyres? 20mm tyres only offer low rolling resistance if they are inflated to a very high pressure, which isn't practical for normal roads. In general, for a given inflation pressure, wider tyres are faster rolling.
At normal pressure (90-120psi) 23 or 25mm tyres have lower rolling resistance, are more comfortable, and more secure downhill. Choose tyres with high-TPI casings and properly slick tread for the lowest losses.0 -
I'd go for 23mms and I doubt a bigger chainring than a 50 is really needed. Learn to pedal faster rather than grinding a big gear.0
-
Narrow tyres = faster is a common misnomer. As others have pointed out, wider tyres are just as fast, are more comfortable,give better grip and puncture less - 20mm tyres are terrible for cornering too. Learn to pedal faster if you want to go quicker too.Make mine an Italian, with Campagnolo on the side..0