Cyclist blames toddler for accident
Dunkindiver
Posts: 143
0
Comments
-
What an absolute scum bag. :x0
-
Let's hope they catch the b4stard0
-
but did he have a Wallace in the other ear :twisted:I wear Lycra because I like the way it feels0
-
Yep he sounds like a bit of a scum bag. MTFU, apologise and buy the little mite some Lego.Ben
Bikes: Donhou DSS4 Custom | Condor Italia RC | Gios Megalite | Dolan Preffisio | Giant Bowery '76
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ben_h_ppcc/
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/143173475@N05/0 -
I can't understand why the cyclist rode off having knocked down the child? Surely they would be concerned for the child? No different to a hit and run driver really.Life is like a roll of toilet paper; long and useful, but always ends at the wrong moment. Anon.
Think how stupid the average person is.......
half of them are even more stupid than you first thought.0 -
Not a 'cyclist' but a kn0b on a bike...0
-
Cue Spen66 coming on and saying that if they're riding a bike then they're a cyclist, end off, blah blah blah,
yawn.0 -
Stu T wrote:but did he have a Wallace in the other ear :twisted:
So what is a grommet anyway? And what would it be doing in an ear?
I think we've all met the bad driver who instantly blames everyone else for their own mistakes or lack of judgement. But it's horrible to hear of cyclists with the same ''it's never my fault'' attitude. On a pavement, as well.0 -
Just try this deptfordmarmoset
www.entuk.org/patient_info/ear/surgery_grommets_html
and read,learn and inwardly digest - there that's showing my age.0 -
NapoleonD wrote:Not a 'cyclist' but a kn0b on a bike...
+1 - too often eejits who jump on a bike to go get their fags at shops, or to visit their mates get labelled a 'cyclist'...there are cyclist's and there are bike riders, just like there are footballers and people kicking a ball about.0 -
Perhaps I am a cynical old bastard, but to me the story does not really add up. I suspect an editor keen to follow an anti-cyclist agenda.0
-
plowmar wrote:Just try this deptfordmarmoset
www.entuk.org/patient_info/ear/surgery_grommets_html
and read,learn and inwardly digest - there that's showing my age.
Well I never.. I'm sure if my ears were better I would probably have heard of them before. Cheers plowmar0 -
Pardon? I heard that.0
-
Perhaps I am a cynical old bastard, but to me the story does not really add up. I suspect an editor keen to follow an anti-cyclist agenda
I'm not so sure, here are a couple of articles from the front page of Todays Echo
http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/o ... wild_side/
http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/b ... of_Winter/0 -
I'm not convinced we've got the whole story here, so I'm not leaping up with my pitchfork & burning brand.
Was this a shared use path? Is a bus station a good place to leave a toddler roaming free? I know I held mine tight. Have any of us really not experienced a person stepping in front so close you can't (or can barely) avoid them?
I agree it's not on to dash off leaving an injured child.Riding on 5310 -
But to blame the child? - parent/carer surely?0
-
NapoleonD wrote:Not a 'cyclist' but a kn0b on a bike...
+1 on that front.
I've never heard of a gromit in the ear so had to google it http://www.earhelp.co.uk/Grommets.html starting to wish I'd not though as its put me right off my breakfast.
P.S. lets hope the child wasn't hit by current world champ Thor as the child he hit ran off before he could say sorry. Though on reflection was probably just some jumped up t@@t.Pain hurts much less if its topped off with beating your mates to top of a climb.0 -
dilemna wrote:I can't understand why the cyclist rode off having knocked down the child? Surely they would be concerned for the child? No different to a hit and run driver really.
You've made the assumption the get has a decent bone in his body, which he obviously has not, utter b@st@rd. Unfortunately as Nap D posted "not a cyclist but a knob on a bike" the GP will however view him as a cyclist. :twisted:Tail end Charlie
The above post may contain traces of sarcasm or/and bullsh*t.0 -
If the cyclist "didnt intend" to hit the kid then its perfectly fine;
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-117871260 -
This nasty little incident has generated over 60 comments in the paper.
In the same newspaper, a report of the killing of a grandmother by a motorist evading the police, on the wrong side of the road with no lights, generates 2 comments.0 -
Buppy wrote:Cue Spen66 coming on and saying that if they're riding a bike then they're a cyclist, end off, blah blah blah,
yawn.
Well as the definition of a cyclist is someone who rides a bike he is a cyclist.
He may well be a kn*b and not the sort of person you want to thinkof as having anything in common with you, but he is still a cyclist.
What is more important than what you think, is what the public at large think. They will see him as a cyclist and tar us with the same brush
We need to make it clear, as everyone has on here, that such behaviour is unacceptable and we all condemn it
What interested me about this was the cyclist fails to see he has done anything wrong at all. Now, I can accept that the child may have moved unexpetedly into the path of the cyclist. however, the cyclist fails to recognise he was illegally riding on the pavement. Even riding slowly and considerately, it is still illegal to ride on the pavement (shared use paths excepted of course), irrespective of the rubbish Paul Boateng spouted in Parliament a few years ago when talking re Fixed penalty notices.
There is a common , albeit misguided, view that it is lawful to ride on the pavement. I often see it on my commute to work when people are riding on pavement even when there is a perfectly suitable cycle lane running parallel to the footpath they are riding onWant to know the Spen666 behind the posts?
Then read MY BLOG @ http://www.pebennett.com
Twittering @spen_6660 -
MichaelW wrote:This nasty little incident has generated over 60 comments in the paper.
In the same newspaper, a report of the killing of a grandmother by a motorist evading the police, on the wrong side of the road with no lights, generates 2 comments.
I can never decide if the number of comments you refer to is
a) because incidents involving cyclists are shocking because rare- compared to road deaths of which there are too many
b) as a result of a real prejudice against cyclistsWant to know the Spen666 behind the posts?
Then read MY BLOG @ http://www.pebennett.com
Twittering @spen_6660 -
spen666 wrote:MichaelW wrote:This nasty little incident has generated over 60 comments in the paper.
In the same newspaper, a report of the killing of a grandmother by a motorist evading the police, on the wrong side of the road with no lights, generates 2 comments.
I can never decide if the number of comments you refer to is
a) because incidents involving cyclists are shocking because rare- compared to road deaths of which there are too many
b) as a result of a real prejudice against cyclists
90% a)
10% b)
Though if there had been a c) scapegoating cyclists because there are far too many road deaths/injuries, I'd have to adjust my percentages.
He's still a twát though.0