An explanation of quantitive easing for children

SimonAH
SimonAH Posts: 3,730
edited November 2010 in Commuting chat
I rather like this...

http://yelnick.typepad.com/

:twisted:
FCN 5 belt driven fixie for city bits
CAADX 105 beastie for bumpy bits
Litespeed L3 for Strava bits

Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.

Comments

  • PBo
    PBo Posts: 2,493
    "is this an episode of the twighlight zone?" ha, ha......
  • soundninjauk
    soundninjauk Posts: 333
    I am both educated and amused. Double win!
    FCN - 10
    Cannondale Bad Boy Solo with baggies.
  • AidanR
    AidanR Posts: 1,142
    It's very easy to create a convincing argument when you only look at one side of things.
    Bike lover and part-time cyclist.
  • spen666
    spen666 Posts: 17,709
    AidanR wrote:
    It's very easy to create a convincing argument when you only look at one side of things.

    +1
    Want to know the Spen666 behind the posts?
    Then read MY BLOG @ http://www.pebennett.com

    Twittering @spen_666
  • dhope
    dhope Posts: 6,699
    AidanR wrote:
    It's very easy to create a convincing argument when you only look at one side of things.

    +1
    Amusing but wouldn't take it any more seriously than I would a taxi driver's take on the world
    Rose Xeon CW Disc
    CAAD12 Disc
    Condor Tempo
  • SimonAH
    SimonAH Posts: 3,730
    Guys, were it to be a serious lecture on economics I would submit that it would not come in cartoon form.........

    Of course it's biased (coupla good points though you have to admit!)
    FCN 5 belt driven fixie for city bits
    CAADX 105 beastie for bumpy bits
    Litespeed L3 for Strava bits

    Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.
  • spen666
    spen666 Posts: 17,709
    SimonAH wrote:
    Guys, were it to be a serious lecture on economics I would submit that it would not come in cartoon form.........
    unless it was propaganda aimed at giving children a slanted view of quantitative easing.

    But its clearly not aimed at children is it. Just look at the title of the thread...oh hang on a minute...Better re think that again

    Of course it's biased (coupla good points though you have to admit!)

    Couple of good points? No, not that I could find. please enlighten me
    Want to know the Spen666 behind the posts?
    Then read MY BLOG @ http://www.pebennett.com

    Twittering @spen_666
  • Sewinman
    Sewinman Posts: 2,131
    spen666 wrote:
    SimonAH wrote:
    Guys, were it to be a serious lecture on economics I would submit that it would not come in cartoon form.........
    unless it was propaganda aimed at giving children a slanted view of quantitative easing.

    But its clearly not aimed at children is it. Just look at the title of the thread...oh hang on a minute...Better re think that again

    Of course it's biased (coupla good points though you have to admit!)

    Couple of good points? No, not that I could find. please enlighten me

    I liked it to begin with - basically cos it sounded like Hawkins and they called it 'the deflation', but then it just became a blog-type simplistic rant. Boooo.
  • TheStone
    TheStone Posts: 2,291
    which parts are not true?
    exercise.png
  • gtvlusso
    gtvlusso Posts: 5,112
    I though that Quantative Easing had something to do with nappies.....

Categories