Man marries pillow

rapid_uphill

True love can take many forms.

http://www.metro.co.uk/weird/816601-man-marries-pillow

Sirius631

His mother took his comfort blanket off him too soon.

Good thing procreation can't take place in this instance, so nature will correct itself eventually.

MattC59

Objectum Sexuality.

It's a known medical condition.

MattC59

Sirius631 wrote:

Good thing procreation can't take place in this instance, so nature will correct itself eventually.

There's a comment that could upset one or two people............

Chip \'oyler

Sirius631 wrote:

His mother took his comfort blanket off him too soon.

Good thing procreation can't take place in this instance, so nature will correct itself eventually.

I bet he's tried a few times though.

In fact I hope he washed it for the wedding

Bunneh

There was a guy who fancied cars and would actively masterbate on them. I believe it was on a documatary a few years ago.

Sirius631

Some would call the old hotel room bicycle insident understandable, except the bike was ugly

IronHorse100

Bunneh wrote:

There was a guy who fancied cars and would actively masterbate on them. I believe it was on a documatary a few years ago.

it's called Top Gear.

Sirius631

MattC59 wrote:

Sirius631 wrote:

Good thing procreation can't take place in this instance, so nature will correct itself eventually.

There's a comment that could upset one or two people............

Who, ugly, fat object fetishists? I'll apologise if someone posts a picture to show that they are ugly and fat, together with the object of their fetishism.

Bunneh

Um, I don't know anyone like that *pushes inflatable Noel Edmunds back under the bed*

Cleat Eastwood

Do you reckon she goes down on him

down...duck feathers..pillo....I'll get me coat.

Sirius631

Cleat Eastwood wrote:

Do you reckon she goes down on him

Are you not thinking of inflatable dolls? I'd have said yes, you've got to keep them pumped up.

Bunneh

Problem with inflatable dolls is one little prick and they go down...

Homer J

MattC59 wrote:

Objectum Sexuality.

It's a known medical condition.

There was a programme about it awhile ago, some bird was getting off with a fence or gate :shock:

drewfromrisca

Oooh that's got to hurt if she's getting off with a fence :twisted:

MattC59

Sirius631 wrote:

MattC59 wrote:

Sirius631 wrote:

Good thing procreation can't take place in this instance, so nature will correct itself eventually.

There's a comment that could upset one or two people............

Who, ugly, fat object fetishists? I'll apologise if someone posts a picture to show that they are ugly and fat, together with the object of their fetishism.

Nope.

By stating that nature will correct it's self, you are implying that this is an abnormality, and procreation is the norm which nature intended. ie those who can't / won't procreate due to not being attracted to the opposite sex (or even opposite sex of any species in this case) are an abnormality / flaw / mistake in nature. So, would you say the same about homosexuality ?

I'd like to make it clear, before I get my head torn off, that this isn't my view. I just don't agree that nature will correct it's self. If that is the case, explain homosexuality........... whilst trying not to offend !

freehub

Only in Korea.......

I bet he nicked the pillow too.

MattC59

freehub wrote:

Only in Korea.......

I bet he nicked the pillow too.

or anywhere else in the world............. see the medical condition Objectum Sexuality.

Ben6899

Bunneh wrote:

There was a guy who fancied cars and would actively masterbate on them. I believe it was on a documatary a few years ago.

"Top Gear"?

Bunneh

Nah it was something like Louis Theroux. The documentary followed this guy's sexual obsession with cars and he actively masterbated over cars he found 'attractive'.

Cleat Eastwood

MattC59 wrote:

Sirius631 wrote:

MattC59 wrote:

Sirius631 wrote:

Good thing procreation can't take place in this instance, so nature will correct itself eventually.

There's a comment that could upset one or two people............

Who, ugly, fat object fetishists? I'll apologise if someone posts a picture to show that they are ugly and fat, together with the object of their fetishism.

Nope.

By stating that nature will correct it's self, you are implying that this is an abnormality, and procreation is the norm which nature intended. ie those who can't / won't procreate due to not being attracted to the opposite sex (or even opposite sex of any species in this case) are an abnormality / flaw / mistake in nature. So, would you say the same about homosexuality ?

I'd like to make it clear, before I get my head torn off, that this isn't my view. I just don't agree that nature will correct it's self. If that is the case, explain homosexuality........... whilst trying not to offend !

Sense of humour breakdown there, I think. I bet uou're single.....or married to a pillow.

MattC59

Cleat Eastwood wrote:

MattC59 wrote:

Sirius631 wrote:

MattC59 wrote:

Sirius631 wrote:

Good thing procreation can't take place in this instance, so nature will correct itself eventually.

There's a comment that could upset one or two people............

Who, ugly, fat object fetishists? I'll apologise if someone posts a picture to show that they are ugly and fat, together with the object of their fetishism.

Nope.

By stating that nature will correct it's self, you are implying that this is an abnormality, and procreation is the norm which nature intended. ie those who can't / won't procreate due to not being attracted to the opposite sex (or even opposite sex of any species in this case) are an abnormality / flaw / mistake in nature. So, would you say the same about homosexuality ?

I'd like to make it clear, before I get my head torn off, that this isn't my view. I just don't agree that nature will correct it's self. If that is the case, explain homosexuality........... whilst trying not to offend !

Sense of humour breakdown there, I think. I bet uou're single.....or married to a pillow.

You could assume that if there was anything to find ammusing your post

Flasheart

Bunneh wrote:

Problem with inflatable dolls is one little prick and they go down...

Bit her tit , she farted and flew out the the window.... :shock:

Mettan

Apparently there are reports coming in that he's been having an affair with a Cushion for 4 months - the Cushion is currrently reportedly in rehab at a local Tailors - not a good start to married life with a rather large Pillow.

Chip \'oyler

He should treat himself and have a threesome with the duvet

Ben6899

MattC59 wrote:

Nope.

By stating that nature will correct it's self, you are implying that this is an abnormality, and procreation is the norm which nature intended. ie those who can't / won't procreate due to not being attracted to the opposite sex (or even opposite sex of any species in this case) are an abnormality / flaw / mistake in nature. So, would you say the same about homosexuality ?

I'd like to make it clear, before I get my head torn off, that this isn't my view. I just don't agree that nature will correct it's self. If that is the case, explain homosexuality........... whilst trying not to offend !

Slight flaw to your argument, Matt. Homosexuality is not hereditary... so although two homosexuals will tend not to procreate (okay a gay fella may procreate with a lesbian woman, but you mentioned sexual attraction so let's assume they don't want to) this does not spell the end of homosexual people in the world's population. Although that will upset a few bigots and extremists, it makes the whole thing rather a moot point.

As for the afflicted members of society - like the fella in the original post - well if people like him did procreate to the same extent as people in the 'normal' end of society's spectrum, then as a world civilisation we'd be up sh1t street; too busy f***ing pillows and w@nking over cars to get anything done.

As it happens, 'normal' tends to out. Survival of the fittest/most suited/strongest.

antfly

I remember reading about a bloke in Sweden who liked to have relations with saddles on women`s bikes, but then who hasn`t had that urge at some time or another ?

MattC59

Ben6899 wrote:

Slight flaw to your argument, Matt. Homosexuality is not hereditary... so although two homosexuals will tend not to procreate (okay a gay fella may procreate with a lesbian woman, but you mentioned sexual attraction so let's assume they don't want to) this does not spell the end of homosexual people in the world's population. Although that will upset a few bigots and extremists, it makes the whole thing rather a moot point.

That's pretty much what I was saying (maybe I didn't word it very well ?)
To sumarise it:
As I understood Sirius631 had stated that nature would correct it's self, implying that Objectum Sexuality (OS) was an abnormality. ie, they had a desire to form a lasting, emotional and sexual relationship with an object that can't procreate. Assuming that OS was hireditory (which it isn't) then nature would correct it's self and the condition would wipe it's self out.
You could (if you were so inclined) say the same about homosexuality. ie a gay man forms a lasting, emotional and sexual relationship with another man, therefore they can't procreate (together). If homosexuality was hireditory, then nature would theoretically correct it's self.

but as we know, the world isn't quite like that. So, I think my point was the same as yours, and my original comment (the one which Cleat Eastwood saw as a humour failure) was just subtly pointing out that people may notice that Sirius631's comment could be misconstrued.

Clearly that was too subtle for Cleat, so he resorted to abuse.

ratsbeyfus

Bunneh, is there an 'inactive' form of masturbation? Sounds nice.

Cleat Eastwood

MattC59 wrote:

[
Clearly that was too subtle for Cleat, so he resorted to abuse.

The point was that it wasnt subtle at all. It was a blatant overreaction to what was a lighthearted comment in a light hearted thread. Apologies if you thought it was abusive, it was more of a *snigger* isnt that matt a bit serious, kind of thing.

By the way theres no such word as hireditory.

MattC59

Cleat Eastwood wrote:

By the way theres no such word as hireditory.

neither is there such a word as "uou're"