Climb categories.
sampurnell
Posts: 126
How do the pro races catgorize climbs,
i.e 4th cat must avg 6% for 2 miles etc??
ta
x
i.e 4th cat must avg 6% for 2 miles etc??
ta
x
0
Comments
-
There's not a hard a fast rule, it depends on other factors like road surface too.0
-
I'm sure there's a more scientific way nowadays, but one of the Eurosport commentators mentioned during the Giro that a category 1 climb was one that was so steep, you had to drive up in first gear, cat 2 equated to second gear and so on. Hors categorie climbs were identified later where it was barely possible to drive up them in an old fashioned car at all.0
-
As I understand it it can also be determined by when the climb happens during the stage - ie a climb at the end of the stage may be given a higher rating than one earlier - which is why L'alpe d'huez is given a HC category.0
-
I think it's based on length, gradient, road surface, where it comes on the stage and possibly altitude. There's no equation as far as I'm aware, just a subjective view taken on how hard it is. Also, to give some perspective, when the Tour came to Britain in 93 and went up Ditchling Beacon it was classed as a 4th category climb - it has been a 1st cat climb in the ToB. That puts it on a par with the Pont St. Nazaire bridge which was also categorised as a 4th cat. Makes London - Brighton seem a bit easy0
-
thank you all.
was watching the tour online and thought "that 4th category doesnt look hard...."0 -
The dissenter is every human being at those moments of his life when he resigns
momentarily from the herd and thinks for himself.0 -
There aren't really any hard and fast rules (which totally fits with organizers in cycling), for example:The organizers of the Tour have been very erratic in their classifications of climbs. The north side of the Col de la Madeleine has flip-flopped between a 1st Category to an Hors Category climb, even though it seems to be in the same position of a stage every year.
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/bicycles-faq/p ... on-22.html0