Riis gets new main sponsor
Comments
-
Pity in a way. Was hoping to see the back of him___________________
Strava is not Zen.0 -
Yeah, why indeed?
Saxo are, as far as I am concerned, by far and away the best team in the peleton.
Competitive from the first race to the last. All they're really lacking is a top top rate sprinter.0 -
I'd hazard a guess that some people are not too keen on Mr 60% due to his alledged use of EPO and later confessions in the use of EPO whilst at Telekom. A quick look on Wiki will give the details. I myself don't care one way or the other about Riis.0
-
wasp707 wrote:I'd hazard a guess that some people are not too keen on Mr 60% due to his alledged use of EPO and later confessions in the use of EPO whilst at Telekom. A quick look on Wiki will give the details. I myself don't care one way or the other about Riis.
Yes, this^.
Its Riis I could do without, not the riders. Although not just the big ring on the Lauteret, but the gut churning hypocrisy of;
2005:
'yes, me and Ivan virtually live together, he owes his entire improvement to my 1-2-1 coaching skills..'
to
2006:
'Basso... yes, wait, name rings a vague bell...'___________________
Strava is not Zen.0 -
Rick Chasey wrote:All they're really lacking is a top top rate sprinter.
tell that to j.j. Haedo0 -
Yeah but Cav was probably only at 90% 80% 70% 60%..... well I guess it just depends on what his mood is that day0
-
calvjones wrote:Pity in a way. Was hoping to see the back of him
A bite harsh that.
Yes, he has a dodgy background as a rider, but he has proven himself to be a very astute DS.
The whole Ivan Basso saga was pretty ugly, but Riis was never implicated in Baso's 'plans to dope'.
Give a guy a break.............................what do you suggest we do with riders/athletes with murky doping allegations - ban them from any role in sport for the rest of their lives?!
And as for his 'Mr 60%' - lest we not forget, this was at a time when it's widely acknowledged, they (the whole pro peleton) were all 'at it'.0 -
pedro118118 wrote:[
Give a guy a break.............................what do you suggest we do with riders/athletes with murky doping allegations - ban them from any role in sport for the rest of their lives?!
And as for his 'Mr 60%' - lest we not forget, this was at a time when it's widely acknowledged, they (the whole pro peloton) were all 'at it'.
Why shouldn't he be banned for life? Or at least banned from running a team.
And just because they were all at it, and doubt the likes of Bassons and Boardman would agree with the assertion, doesn't make it right.0 -
OK - I understand the frustration, but where do you draw the line?
There are plenty of riders from the 'dirty generation' who remain actively involved in the sport within ProTour teams, the media..................even in positions of authority.
Plus, in legal terms, it would be impossible, due to European restriction on trade issues.
As for the all being 'at it', of course there are always exceptions, but I was referring to the GC Grand Tour contenders and Classics winners during the 90s.0 -
Maybe that's why the sport can't get rid of the shadow of doping, as so many of the people running the teams have a history of doping themselves?
Is it possible to change? I'd cite Vaughters as proof that you can but I'm not sure he's ever openly admitted to doping? However, I'd rather people like him ran teams that the likes of Riis and Gianetti.0 -
andyp wrote:Maybe that's why the sport can't get rid of the shadow of doping, as so many of the people running the teams have a history of doping themselves?
Is it possible to change? I'd cite Vaughters as proof that you can but I'm not sure he's ever openly admitted to doping? However, I'd rather people like him ran teams that the likes of Riis and Gianetti.
I think what cycling needs to do is introduce a licencing system for working in the sport. We all know people like Rudi Pevenage all think that unless you dope you can't compete and all their teams have programmes. These are the sort of poeple who shouldn't be in the sport and all the old guard that go with them. With no licencing system these people can't be banned from the sport just the riders themselves0 -
pedro118118 wrote:calvjones wrote:Pity in a way. Was hoping to see the back of him
A bite harsh that.
Yes, he has a dodgy background as a rider, but he has proven himself to be a very astute DS.
The whole Ivan Basso saga was pretty ugly, but Riis was never implicated in Baso's 'plans to dope'.
Give a guy a break.............................what do you suggest we do with riders/athletes with murky doping allegations - ban them from any role in sport for the rest of their lives?!
And as for his 'Mr 60%' - lest we not forget, this was at a time when it's widely acknowledged, they (the whole pro peloton) were all 'at it'.
I wasn't suggesting we ban anyone for life, just offering a personal opinion on someone who's behaviour I find objectionable.
I find the Saxo/CSC banging on about team spirit and the gung ho togetherness (especially with regard to Basso) somewhat at odds with the fact he didn't know Ivan was preparing to dope, that Frank had a hotline to Fuentes, that Tyler won LBL and Romandy doped to the gills and beyond, and is happy to see his star rider work with one of the top 2 dodgiest doctors in cycling. 'Astute' DS? Hell yes, but so is Bruyneel and I'm not fussed on him either, whereas Madiot, Vaughters, I like to see their riders win.
But again, only my personal opinion, and your mileage may differ.
I may have dreamt this, and apologies if so, but were there not suggestions Riis himself went to Madrid quite a lot in 05/06?___________________
Strava is not Zen.0 -
it's being denied now (the sponsorship, not the doping stuff):
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/saxo-ba ... am-sponsor
do we believe?0 -
I'm not saying I like Riis particularly - or Bruyneel for that matter. I'm saying that just because he's mad mistakes in the past (under mitigating circumstances he would argue), it doesn't mean he shouldn't be allowed to work in the sport of cycling. Now if there was any evidence of inproper conduct at Saxo Bank, then perhaps I would have a different view.
As you say, each to their own...0 -
pedro118118 wrote:I'm not saying I like Riis particularly - or Bruyneel for that matter. I'm saying that just because he's mad mistakes in the past (under mitigating circumstances he would argue), it doesn't mean he shouldn't be allowed to work in the sport of cycling. Now if there was any evidence of inproper conduct at Saxo Bank, then perhaps I would have a different view.
As you say, each to their own...
Well indeed, I never suggested a ban. However, if he couldn't find a sponsor despite having a stellar crew because big companies trusted him less to run a clean ship that Cuddly Bob S. et al, well that would be chickens coming home to roost.___________________
Strava is not Zen.0 -
Perhaps you're right.
He does have a very good eye for talent and has a very impressive roster of riders - all ages and abilities. With more coming through all the time, like Fuglesang (?!) and Porte etc.
Makes you wonder whether the uncertainty over the family jewels are putting off potential partners. Without the Schlecks and Spartacus, the super squad doesn't appear quite so super I suppose?
Seems incredible to me that any team that has Fabian Cancellara on the roster can struggle to find a commercial sponsor?!0 -
calvjones wrote:if he couldn't find a sponsor despite having a stellar crew because big companies trusted him less to run a clean ship that Cuddly Bob S. et al, well that would be chickens coming home to roost.
Would you trust him with a buttload of your own cash? Not sure I would.0 -
I've got to admit, you guys are what I call true fans. You sound just like a friend of mines father and his next door neighbor. One loved the Detroit Lions and the other the Cleveland Browns but BOTH of them knew exactly how their respective teams should be run, who should be traded for who, and who should be just plain fired. They knew it all, yet neither had ever actually played any kind of organized football. It amazed me how they could argue for hours about d*mn near everything, and anything, that was even vaguely related to football.0
-
dennisn wrote:I've got to admit, you guys are what I call true fans. You sound just like a friend of mines father and his next door neighbor. One loved the Detroit Lions and the other the Cleveland Browns but BOTH of them knew exactly how their respective teams should be run, who should be traded for who, and who should be just plain fired. They knew it all, yet neither had ever actually played any kind of organized football. It amazed me how they could argue for hours about d*mn near everything, and anything, that was even vaguely related to football.
Jeez, Dennis change the fking record, huh?___________________
Strava is not Zen.0 -
calvjones wrote:dennisn wrote:I've got to admit, you guys are what I call true fans. You sound just like a friend of mines father and his next door neighbor. One loved the Detroit Lions and the other the Cleveland Browns but BOTH of them knew exactly how their respective teams should be run, who should be traded for who, and who should be just plain fired. They knew it all, yet neither had ever actually played any kind of organized football. It amazed me how they could argue for hours about d*mn near everything, and anything, that was even vaguely related to football.
Jeez, Dennis change the fking record, huh?
I could say the same about all the doper talk. But I won't.0 -
0
-
afx237vi wrote:
He's my younger brother.0 -
pedro118118 wrote:Riis, Give a guy a break............................
And as for his 'Mr 60%' - lest we not forget, this was at a time when it's widely acknowledged, they (the whole pro peloton) were all 'at it'.
There is only one other guy with similar palmares has done that. !Organiser, National Championship 50 mile Time Trial 19720 -
deejay wrote:pedro118118 wrote:Riis, Give a guy a break............................
And as for his 'Mr 60%' - lest we not forget, this was at a time when it's widely acknowledged, they (the whole pro peloton) were all 'at it'.
There is only one other guy with similar palmares has done that. !
Check out the top 20.
It's hardly a who's who of riders who definitely never doped.0 -
dennisn wrote:I've got to admit, you guys are what I call true fans. You sound just like a friend of mines father and his next door neighbor. One loved the Detroit Lions and the other the Cleveland Browns but BOTH of them knew exactly how their respective teams should be run, who should be traded for who, and who should be just plain fired. They knew it all, yet neither had ever actually played any kind of organized football. It amazed me how they could argue for hours about d*mn near everything, and anything, that was even vaguely related to football.
I think you'll find the abomination of a 'game' played by Detroit Lions (is there much big game wondering the plains of MoTown BTW?) and Cleveland Browns is not even vaguely related to football. Clue: foot + ball = football.0