First attempt with SPD's today in 30 mins

bails87

antfly wrote:

bails87 wrote:

cee
Argh! Let it die!

It`s your fault for bringing it up in that other thread, why couldn`t you just let it lie. :roll:

Damn, did cee find it through that then? I just didn't want to be outdone by the commuters!

antfly

I don`t think the tedium that is this thread will ever be outdone, even by the commuters.

bike-a-swan

Will Snow wrote:

i think it is required reading for any science geek

I made the mistake of listening to someone and reading xkcd sucks. It makes some good points, xkcd has got weaker the last few years, but it still manages some gems

RealMan

http://xkcd.com/346/

weeksy59

I wanna know if the lad i gave the pedals to has tried them or not

Cferg

He has indeed ! And is finding them hard to get used to :? Once my exams are finito though I'm gonna go a few epics, get a better pair of shoes and give them a proper good go.

Heres hoping that I wont fall too many more times

Thanks again Weeksy

RealMan

lol

http://www.singletrackworld.com/forum/t ... d-to-flats

simonfbarnes wrote:

0%
for a start, you have to say efficiency of what
but for most of us, the limit to the power we can output is cardiovascular, not muscle power, so the pedals make no difference

druidh wrote:

SFB is absolutely correct. That's why no professional cyclists use SPDs.

Oh.....

rudedog

RealMan wrote:

lol

http://www.singletrackworld.com/forum/t ... d-to-flats

simonfbarnes wrote:

0%
for a start, you have to say efficiency of what
but for most of us, the limit to the power we can output is cardiovascular, not muscle power, so the pedals make no difference

druidh wrote:

SFB is absolutely correct. That's why no professional cyclists use SPDs.

Oh.....

whats funny ?

bike-a-swan

No. No. NO! Not this again, please, mercy!

supersonic

Someone lock the thread!

Oh...