Greece now - the UK next?

Cressers
Cressers Posts: 1,329
edited April 2010 in The bottom bracket
It seems to me that the markets are just marking time until after the election result, and once that is in, the s**t really hits the fan..
«1

Comments

  • daviesee
    daviesee Posts: 6,386
    No s**t Sherlock.........

    Hypothetical situation

    "Things are not good, the election is coming up, do you think we should tell everybody?

    Eh, no"

    :evil:
    None of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.
  • nolf
    nolf Posts: 1,287
    BOLLOX.,
    Really, just no.

    Is this the international conspiracy between economic agents and govt., who conspire to preserve the status quo, before shocking the world with devestating news?

    Will reply in full tomorrow, but basically the 2 situations are completely different in every way/shape/form.
    "I hold it true, what'er befall;
    I feel it, when I sorrow most;
    'Tis better to have loved and lost;
    Than never to have loved at all."

    Alfred Tennyson
  • daviesee
    daviesee Posts: 6,386
    The markets are still in a state of confusion between a state of rebound and recovery.

    The Governments finances are separate but do affect the market.

    The true state of the Government's finances are unclear as they only know the true figure.
    It is accepted that there are massive black holes but the size of these holes are only guessed at and will become apparent after the election.

    This is holding back the British markets and the IMF may well have something to say if things get as bad as Greece.

    Only my opinion of course, but this is a cycling forum :wink:
    None of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.
  • cedar404
    cedar404 Posts: 176
    Cressers wrote:
    It seems to me that the markets are just marking time until after the election result, and once that is in, the s**t really hits the fan..

    Economics Fail, go out for a cycle you might feel better.
  • Cressers
    Cressers Posts: 1,329
    edited April 2010
    In august '06 I was derrided as a doom-monger on another forum for predicting a slump...
  • TheStone
    TheStone Posts: 2,291
    There's some big differences between the UK and Greece.

    Mainly, the UK has it's own currency, which it's been printing/devaluing during the crisis.
    Over the short term, this can cushion/hide many of the problems. Long term, not so much.

    Secondly, historically the UK issues long term debt (25yrs), so the rollover of the debt is
    not so frequent. This means the market is less likely to 'test' the UK.

    The underlying issues are much the same. Too much public spending. Too much debt (public,
    banking and private).

    The UK is a much larger economy which should mean it can avoid the huge problems seen
    in Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Iceland and Spain.

    However, of the larger countries only Japan is in as bad situation as the UK. Hard to see
    how this will play out, but the IMF/EU cannot save the UK.

    Whatever happens, the standard of living will drop substantially.
    exercise.png
  • cedar404
    cedar404 Posts: 176
    TheStone wrote:
    Whatever happens, the standard of living will drop substantially.

    Only if the Conservatives have a majority. I think someone needs to send Gideon Osborne General Theory of Employment Interest and Money by Keynes.
  • -spider-
    -spider- Posts: 2,548
    Cressers wrote:
    In august '06 I was derrided as a doom-monger on another forum for predicting a slump...

    Well that's where you made your mistake then.

    What you should have done was discuss your issue with the cognoscenti of Cake Stop where appropriate advice and/or comment would have been given.

    :D:D:D

    -Spider-
  • TheStone
    TheStone Posts: 2,291
    cedar404 wrote:
    TheStone wrote:
    Whatever happens, the standard of living will drop substantially.

    Only if the Conservatives have a majority. I think someone needs to send Gideon Osborne General Theory of Employment Interest and Money by Keynes.

    You can't keep borrowing and spending forever.
    exercise.png
  • rhext
    rhext Posts: 1,639
    Isn't predicting a slump a little bit like predicting rain? The tricky bit is not predicting it will happen, but predicting when it will happen!
  • Seanos
    Seanos Posts: 301
    Cressers wrote:
    It seems to me that the markets are just marking time until after the election result, and once that is in, the s**t really hits the fan..
    What markets? Currency markets? Equity markets? Commodity markets? Futures markets? All of them?

    The one thing they have in common is that they don't 'mark time' - they reflect the actual real time value (i.e. the price buyers are willing to pay) of the assets being traded. If sentiment changes, prices change almost immediately, so views of short and long term prospects are already priced in.

    The election result could obviously affect markets, but that has always been the case. I don't see why things are likely to be drastically different this time. If the markets like the result (majority government, clear mandate, political and economic stability) then the impact won';t be that great. If they don't like the result (hung parliament, radical economic policies, short term poliical and economic uncertainty) then they will be a bit more volatile.

    Unless you've got a lot of money tied up in 'the markets' that you're going to need in the near future then I wouldn't worry too much.
  • TheStone
    TheStone Posts: 2,291
    Seanos wrote:
    What markets? Currency markets? Equity markets? Commodity markets? Futures markets? All of them?
    The important one is the bond market. In particular the gilt market.

    If confidence in the UK drops further then the price of gilts will fall and the price of
    borrowing rises.

    The confidence in the UK will fall if there doesn't seem to be a plan to reduce the deficit.

    IMO, the deficit needs to become a surplus much sooner than expected. The plan to half
    the deficit over the course of the next parliament is nowhere near enough if you also want
    to keep interest rates low.
    exercise.png
  • nolf
    nolf Posts: 1,287
    cedar404 wrote:
    TheStone wrote:
    Whatever happens, the standard of living will drop substantially.

    Only if the Conservatives have a majority. I think someone needs to send Gideon Osborne General Theory of Employment Interest and Money by Keynes.

    Really?

    Keynes was a genius in his day, but is totally outdated today. Economics changes, as people and society changes. Writings from 60 years ago are of limited use today.
    Not that he was great back then anyway...
    "I hold it true, what'er befall;
    I feel it, when I sorrow most;
    'Tis better to have loved and lost;
    Than never to have loved at all."

    Alfred Tennyson
  • cedar404
    cedar404 Posts: 176
    Quite really ....

    Keynes > Supply Side Economics / Monetarism.

    End Of.
  • daviesee
    daviesee Posts: 6,386
    daviesee wrote:
    The markets are still in a state of confusion between a state of rebound and recovery.

    The Governments finances are separate but do affect the market.

    The true state of the Government's finances are unclear as they only know the true figure.
    It is accepted that there are massive black holes but the size of these holes are only guessed at and will become apparent after the election.


    This is holding back the British markets and the IMF may well have something to say if things get as bad as Greece.

    Only my opinion of course, but this is a cycling forum :wink:

    Anyone seen the news today?

    It's not always a good thing being right :evil:
    None of the above should be taken seriously, and certainly not personally.
  • TheStone
    TheStone Posts: 2,291
    If your aim is GDP growth, then Keynes is fine*.

    The problem is that at some point the debt needs to be serviced and as it gets too large
    this becomes impossible, as Greece are finding out now.

    This recession/depression came about because there was far too much debt (money
    supply inflation) with hardly any increase in wages. Once the debt got too large, people
    started to default, the banks were insolvent, less lending then less spending.

    The government (following the Keynes model), increased spending to fill the decline in
    private spending. They didn't aim to replace private debt with public debt, they only aimed
    to replace the spending in the hope that magically it would all work out. Now we still have
    massive private debt, but also massive public debt.

    Still no idea how this will play out, but it won't be nice.

    The order:
    - Iceland
    - Greece
    - Portugal
    - Spain
    - Ireland
    - Italy
    - UK

    (* I'm not sure GDP growth measures much more than a function of the difference
    between money supply inflation and a price index M4vCPI).
    exercise.png
  • Jez mon
    Jez mon Posts: 3,809
    TheStone wrote:

    IMO, the deficit needs to become a surplus much sooner than expected. The plan to half
    the deficit over the course of the next parliament is nowhere near enough if you also want
    to keep interest rates low.

    How is this meant to happen though? The debt is huge!
    You live and learn. At any rate, you live
  • Can't we just get incriminating photographs of the head of the IMF and his mistress?
    What wheels...? Wheelsmith.co.uk!
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/blog ... ial-crisis


    Take a look at the sub-title:

    • S&P hits Spain with a credit rating downgrade


    So Spain is the next Greece eh?

    1-0 isn't it Cressers?
  • TheStone
    TheStone Posts: 2,291
    Jez mon wrote:
    TheStone wrote:

    IMO, the deficit needs to become a surplus much sooner than expected. The plan to half
    the deficit over the course of the next parliament is nowhere near enough if you also want
    to keep interest rates low.

    How is this meant to happen though? The debt is huge!

    - Raise tax wherever possible (although we're probably close to the maximum take)
    - Remove all middle class benefits
    - Reduce all housing benefit
    - Cut benefits where possible
    - Cut spending where possible.
    - Raise all retirement ages.

    We do it now, or we have to go further later.
    exercise.png
  • Cressers wrote:
    It seems to me that the markets are just marking time until after the election result, and once that is in, the s**t really hits the fan..

    Do you work for the Daily Mail by any chance? :wink:
  • berliner
    berliner Posts: 340
    I got chills they're multiplying
    And they're loosing control
    Cos the money they're supplying
    It's just crazy

    Greece is the word


    The Westminster Gravy Train ??? You ain't seen nothing yet.

    VOTE UKIP
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
  • Foucault
    Foucault Posts: 104
    There's a very good article by Stephanie Flanders about the difference between the UK and Greece here

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters ... r_now.html
  • berliner
    berliner Posts: 340
    Et voila
    see
    Open Europe estimates for EU-27 budget for 2007-2013 in euros (€)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_of_ ... pean_Union


    Let's get out of Europe , we'll probably suffer like Switzerland and Norway
  • berliner wrote:
    Et voila
    see
    Open Europe estimates for EU-27 budget for 2007-2013 in euros (€)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_of_ ... pean_Union


    Let's get out of Europe , we'll probably suffer like Switzerland and Norway

    You've clearly put a lot of thought into this :wink:
  • berliner
    berliner Posts: 340
    berliner wrote:
    Et voila
    see
    Open Europe estimates for EU-27 budget for 2007-2013 in euros (€)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_of_ ... pean_Union


    Let's get out of Europe , we'll probably suffer like Switzerland and Norway

    You've clearly put a lot of thought into this :wink:


    Sie haben klar gestellt sehr viele Gedanken in diese
    Вие ясно поставени много мисъл в тази
    Heu clarament lloc molt pensament en aquest
    Vy jste jasně dát hodně myslel, že do tohoto
    Du har tydeligvis lagt en masse tankevirksomhed i denne
    Je hebt duidelijk een hoop geld van het denken in deze
    Olete ilmselgelt palju mõelnud sellesse
    Olet selvästi tehnyt paljon ajatellut tätä
    Vous avez clairement mis beaucoup de pensée dans ce
    Tá tú a chur go soiléir go leor cheap isteach sa
    ......................................bored

    In the European Parliament the translations costs a full-day
    meeting is €118,000
  • rick_chasey
    rick_chasey Posts: 75,661
    berliner wrote:
    berliner wrote:
    Et voila
    see
    Open Europe estimates for EU-27 budget for 2007-2013 in euros (€)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_of_ ... pean_Union


    Let's get out of Europe , we'll probably suffer like Switzerland and Norway

    You've clearly put a lot of thought into this :wink:


    Sie haben klar gestellt sehr viele Gedanken in diese
    Вие ясно поставени много мисъл в тази
    Heu clarament lloc molt pensament en aquest
    Vy jste jasně dát hodně myslel, že do tohoto
    Du har tydeligvis lagt en masse tankevirksomhed i denne
    Je hebt duidelijk een hoop geld van het denken in deze
    Olete ilmselgelt palju mõelnud sellesse
    Olet selvästi tehnyt paljon ajatellut tätä
    Vous avez clairement mis beaucoup de pensée dans ce
    Tá tú a chur go soiléir go leor cheap isteach sa
    ......................................bored

    In the European Parliament the translations costs a full-day
    meeting is €118,000

    Oo scary foreigners speaking another language. :o

    UK trades more with EU members than the rest of the world combined.

    Makes sense to be part of what is still principally an economic union. Country gains plenty more from that trade advantage than the cost to run the thing.

    Anyway, people are getting paid for that translation. More jobs?

    p.s. shame you didn't translate the whole sentence...
  • Jez mon
    Jez mon Posts: 3,809
    TheStone wrote:
    Jez mon wrote:
    TheStone wrote:

    IMO, the deficit needs to become a surplus much sooner than expected. The plan to half
    the deficit over the course of the next parliament is nowhere near enough if you also want
    to keep interest rates low.

    How is this meant to happen though? The debt is huge!

    - Raise tax wherever possible (although we're probably close to the maximum take)
    - Remove all middle class benefits
    - Reduce all housing benefit
    - Cut benefits where possible
    - Cut spending where possible.
    - Raise all retirement ages.

    We do it now, or we have to go further later.

    - As you say, tax is already quite high, combine this with the fact that many feel they get poor value for money and this would be extremely unpopular
    - I don't have figures, but my understanding is that removing such benefits would be a drop in the ocean (happy to be proved wrong though)
    - Pretty much same as above
    - Million dollar question, where do you cut spending? IIRC this country has got itself into a position where many jobs are dependant on a certain level of public spending, cut the spending and you risk starting off another economic decline.
    - Fine with me, but can we lower them again when I become middle aged? :lol:

    I agree that this country faces some pretty dire times ahead,( tbh, I'm looking to emigrate once I graduate). However, I think that the decline on public spending has to be managed very carefully, people genuinely feel they're being taxed to the hilt and get poor vfm, so spending cuts that result in lower quality front line services will be poorly received.
    You live and learn. At any rate, you live
  • berliner wrote:
    berliner wrote:
    Et voila
    see
    Open Europe estimates for EU-27 budget for 2007-2013 in euros (€)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budget_of_ ... pean_Union


    Let's get out of Europe , we'll probably suffer like Switzerland and Norway

    You've clearly put a lot of thought into this :wink:


    Sie haben klar gestellt sehr viele Gedanken in diese
    Вие ясно поставени много мисъл в тази
    Heu clarament lloc molt pensament en aquest
    Vy jste jasně dát hodně myslel, že do tohoto
    Du har tydeligvis lagt en masse tankevirksomhed i denne
    Je hebt duidelijk een hoop geld van het denken in deze
    Olete ilmselgelt palju mõelnud sellesse
    Olet selvästi tehnyt paljon ajatellut tätä
    Vous avez clairement mis beaucoup de pensée dans ce
    Tá tú a chur go soiléir go leor cheap isteach sa
    ......................................bored

    In the European Parliament the translations costs a full-day
    meeting is €118,000

    clearly not then :)