Cycling manifestos

deptfordmarmoset
deptfordmarmoset Posts: 3,118
edited April 2010 in The bottom bracket
I've just trawled through the manifestos that have been published so far to see where the bicycle fits in on the political highway. (Search terms: ''bike'' and ''cycl*''). Here then is the complete text that the 3 main parties have offered cyclists:

Conservative manifesto

We will support sustainable travel initiatives that work best for local communities by: giving the concerns • of cyclists much greater priority;

(Citing Freiburg as model of sustainability): Over the past 30 years, 500km of bike lanes and 9,000 bike parking sites have been put in place and, as a result, Freiburg now has the lowest car usage of any city in Germany

Labour manifesto

We will encourage more people to switch to rail with an enforceable right to the cheapest fare, while trebling the number of secure cyclestorage spaces at rail stations.

LibDems manifesto

Include the promotion of safer cycling and pedestrian routes in all local transport plans.

(UKIP, Plaid Cymru: no references found, the Greens' manifesto is awaiting publication)

Comments

  • Wooliferkins
    Wooliferkins Posts: 2,060
    You should see the vapid replies you get when you write to your prospective representatives via the CTCs Vote Bike links.
    Neil
    Help I'm Being Oppressed
  • LittleB0b
    LittleB0b Posts: 416
    You may also find this from the Guardian Bike Blog of intrest

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2 ... st-pledges

    including UKIP's "make cyclists get of and walk at roundabouts" pledge

    :roll:
  • What are the BNP going to do?

    "British bikes for British people (and the bikes must be painted white only)". :wink:
    Let's close our eyes and see what happens
  • LittleB0b wrote:
    You may also find this from the Guardian Bike Blog of intrest

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2 ... st-pledges

    including UKIP's "make cyclists get of and walk at roundabouts" pledge

    :roll:

    Looks like I should have read the blog first!
  • spen666
    spen666 Posts: 17,709
    ....

    (UKIP, Plaid Cymru: no references found, the Greens' manifesto is awaiting publication)


    Trawl again!!!


    Page 20 of UKIP manifesto deals with cycling
    Want to know the Spen666 behind the posts?
    Then read MY BLOG @ http://www.pebennett.com

    Twittering @spen_666
  • LittleB0b
    LittleB0b Posts: 416
    spen666 wrote:

    Trawl again!!!


    Page 20 of UKIP manifesto deals with cycling

    as in those pesky cyclists need dealing with ?
  • spen666 wrote:
    ....

    (UKIP, Plaid Cymru: no references found, the Greens' manifesto is awaiting publication)


    Trawl again!!!


    Page 20 of UKIP manifesto deals with cycling

    I just did. The April 2010 manifesto (http://www.ukip.org/media/pdf/UKIPManifesto2010.pdf) only has 16 pages with no references to bikes or cycling - so I guess you're looking at their road transport document. Which is fair enough but I looked at manifestos to gauge where bikes fitted in to the parties' general policy and presentation.
  • beverick
    beverick Posts: 3,461
    It did strike me that UKIP's manifesto, at 16 pages is a) the only one likely to be read (when compared to (Labour's 76 pages of twaddle and the Conservative's OTT 131 telephone directory) and b) the onlty one which can be printed without trashing half a forest's worth of tree.

    Bob
  • spen666
    spen666 Posts: 17,709
    beverick wrote:
    It did strike me that UKIP's manifesto, at 16 pages is a) the only one likely to be read (when compared to (Labour's 76 pages of twaddle and the Conservative's OTT 131 telephone directory) and b) the onlty one which can be printed without trashing half a forest's worth of tree.

    Bob

    and it will last you in the barthroom for a few days until you get some more andrex
    Want to know the Spen666 behind the posts?
    Then read MY BLOG @ http://www.pebennett.com

    Twittering @spen_666
  • Porgy
    Porgy Posts: 4,525
    beverick wrote:
    the onlty one which can be printed without trashing half a forest's worth of tree.

    Bob

    don't print them then
  • And here's the Green Party's tuppence on the penny farthing:

    Green Party

    To encourage walking and cycling for shorter journeys and improve road safety we would:
    • Reduce speed limits (e.g. to 20mph in built-up areas, including villages).
    • Make streets safe; make them public spaces again. Plan for mixed-use developments where shops, housing and businesses are closely located and connected by pavements and cycleways.
    • Introduce a maximum speed limit of 55mph on motorways and trunk roads, and 40mph on rural roads, to make them safer for all road users.
    • Introduce schemes such as Home Zones, Safe Routes to School and pedestrianisation.
    • Ensure that at least 10% of transport spending is on securing a shift to more active
    travel like walking and cycling.

    Expansion of public transport (and walking and cycling) is critically important to decarbonising
    our transport infrastructure, which is the only sector in which climate-altering carbon
    emissions are currently growing.

    We would divert money currently being wasted on huge road projects and put more of the
    UK’s transport budget into public transport, and especially into local schemes for walking,
    cycling and bus travel.

    • More money for sustainable transport officers to promote cycling and walking and carry out cycle training in schools.
  • Porgy
    Porgy Posts: 4,525
    I'm torn between voting Green and spoiling my vote. I suppose it all depends on whether there's even a Green candidate in my area. There wasn't last time.
  • Stuey01
    Stuey01 Posts: 1,273
    Green Party:
    Introduce a maximum speed limit of 55mph on motorways and trunk roads, and 40mph on rural roads, to make them safer for all road users.

    55mph on motorways! f*ck off.

    Motorway speed limit should be going up not down. 80mph ftw.
    Not climber, not sprinter, not rouleur
  • lae
    lae Posts: 555
    I think 70 is fine on motorways/dual carriageways. Per mile motorways are much safer than city streets and country lanes. The UK's motorways are the safest in Europe - and also the slowest - I definitely don't think the limit should be raised.

    Fast country roads are the really dangerous roads and I think they should have a lower speed limit. Maybe lower the national limit from 60 to 50.

    Also I think one of the major problems with speeding is the overly-refined nature of modern cars. I used to have a 1969 MGB which was faster than most little modern hatchbacks. If you were going too fast, you heard and felt it. If you took a corner too fast, you could feel the tyres squealing and the steering wheel squirming. Do the same speeds in a Citroen C2 and you'd feel nothing.

    I suppose people don't want to be reminded that cars are dangerous though. Example - in the early 50s motor boom in the US, car manufacturers were well aware of the benefits of seatbelts and padded dashboards, but didn't install them - their marketing people explained this by saying it would hurt sales.
  • Porgy
    Porgy Posts: 4,525
    Stuey01 wrote:
    Green Party:
    Introduce a maximum speed limit of 55mph on motorways and trunk roads, and 40mph on rural roads, to make them safer for all road users.

    55mph on motorways! f*ck off.

    Motorway speed limit should be going up not down. 80mph ftw.

    But I don;t drive, so I don't care. :P
  • Bump!

    Here's a commuting solution for Londoner cyclists from the Monster Raving Loony Party...

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/ ... 628230.stm