Institute of Advanced Motorists' Cycling Poll
prj45
Posts: 2,208
Results look scewed already, but worth scewing them more I guess:
http://www.iam.org.uk/iam_polls/
(is that how you spell scew, it looks wrong)?
http://www.iam.org.uk/iam_polls/
(is that how you spell scew, it looks wrong)?
0
Comments
-
-
jimmypippa wrote:skew
While you're at it did I get the apostophe right in the title?0 -
lfgss have a thread about it... that might be the answer you're looking forPurveyor of sonic doom
Very Hairy Roadie - FCN 4
Fixed Pista- FCN 5
Beared Bromptonite - FCN 140 -
prj45 wrote:jimmypippa wrote:skew
While you're at it did I get the apostophe right in the title?
Yes, motorists is plural so the apostrophe comes after the s. Mind you, there's an r missing from ''apostophe'' Spelling was invented to skrew us up....0 -
deptfordmarmoset wrote:prj45 wrote:jimmypippa wrote:skew
While you're at it did I get the apostophe right in the title?
Yes, motorists is plural so the apostrophe comes after the s. Mind you, there's an r missing from ''apostophe'' Spelling was invented to skrew us up....
Its' awl gonn a bit rong ass phar ass speeling and grammer is conserned has'nt it?0 -
Standing by door with megaphone ready to beat hectic retreat...
IAM - the Brompton riders of the motoring world!"Consider the grebe..."0 -
Clever Pun wrote:lfgss have a thread about it... that might be the answer you're looking for
Ah.
Didn't see that, but then again I don't visit there because I don't want to come out of it f***ing swearing like a fu****g c**t boll*ck w*nk turd sh*t a*se c**k m****r fu***ker.
(as you can see, I fackin visited the forum to check it out CO*K!0 -
Voted as pro-cycle as is possible. Including 20mph speed limit in city areas.+++++++++++++++++++++
we are the proud, the few, Descendents.
Panama - finally putting a nail in the economic theory of the trickle down effect.0 -
Voted also. They've been a bit too keen on helmets/flouro reflectives for the wrong reasons in the past though, perhaps. Though the more who encourage cycling as a real and viable alternative to a money gaffawing, space killing car, LOL, the better.0
-
-
prj45 wrote:Clever Pun wrote:lfgss have a thread about it... that might be the answer you're looking for
Ah.
Didn't see that, but then again I don't visit there because I don't want to come out of it f***ing swearing like a fu****g c**t boll*ck w*nk turd sh*t a*se c**k m****r fu***ker.
(as you can see, I fackin visited the forum to check it out CO*K!
Ahhhh..... FGSS the people who brought tourettes into touring....Chunky Cyclists need your love too! :-)
2009 Specialized Tricross Sport
2011 Trek Madone 4.5
2012 Felt F65X
Proud CX Pervert and quiet roadie. 12 mile commuter0 -
voted, and am actually a member of the IAM (and don't have a Brompton)0
-
prj45 wrote:jimmypippa wrote:skew
While you're at it did I get the apostophe right in the title?
Cue the grammar nazis ;-)2010 Lynskey R230
2013 Yeti SB660 -
lights 24/7? - what are they sponsored by duracell or something? :shock: :evil:0
-
The questions are all a bit skewed; nothing about better traffic policing or making it clear to drivers that it's their responsibility to look for cyclists, as has been pointed out above.
Andy0 -
So if IAM members vote that it should be compulsory for cyclists to wear helmets, carry lights 24/7 and ride on seperate cycle lanes..... :?
<shudder>
Meanwhile back in the real world.0 -
I've been an IAM member for 11 years and voted for lycra to be banned.0
-
Porgy wrote:lights 24/7? - what are they sponsored by duracell or something? :shock: :evil:
I forget where I saw it but someone was campaigning for lights 24/7 on cycles - through the compulsary use of dynamos. Only B&M seem to make a reasonable dynamo light and it aint cheap.0 -
downfader wrote:Porgy wrote:lights 24/7? - what are they sponsored by duracell or something? :shock: :evil:
I forget where I saw it but someone was campaigning for lights 24/7 on cycles - through the compulsary use of dynamos. Only B&M seem to make a reasonable dynamo light and it aint cheap.
I really don't understand what the point of this would be. We are not Volvo drivers! :x0 -
Porgy wrote:downfader wrote:Porgy wrote:lights 24/7? - what are they sponsored by duracell or something? :shock: :evil:
I forget where I saw it but someone was campaigning for lights 24/7 on cycles - through the compulsary use of dynamos. Only B&M seem to make a reasonable dynamo light and it aint cheap.
I really don't understand what the point of this would be. We are not Volvo drivers! :x
I know, and imvho I think it teaches people to look for lights rather than vehicles and people. The pedestrian will suffer as a result which is why I think it has never come into law in the UK.0 -
Porgy wrote:I really don't understand what the point of this would be. We are not Volvo drivers! :x
Not just Volvo's and Old SAABs with Daylight Driving lamps now.
FWiW My answer to what else can be done was "Better Driver AND Cyclist education"Do Nellyphants count?
Commuter: FCN 9
Cheapo Roadie: FCN 5
Off Road: FCN 11
+1 when I don't get round to shaving for x days0