which toupe??

dieselgeezer
dieselgeezer Posts: 231
edited February 2010 in Road buying advice
Is there any difference, comfortwise, between the standard Toupe saddle & the Toupe Gel?? Obviously looking for the comfiest rather than the lightest & still trying to find the Holy Grail.
-- "I am but a spoke in the wheel of life" -- Ghandi

Comments

  • On my 3rd Toupe and the current is the Gel - Slight padding and feels marginally more comfy to me - My old one split at the rear and was replaced under warranty - Overall I would choose Gel as opposed to a few grams - I find them comfy but not all agree
    2009 S Works SL2
    2009 Specialized Tarmac Expert
    2007 Specialized Tarmac - Single Speed conversion!
    2010 Specialized Rockhopper SL Expert MTB
    2009 Specialized P2 All Mountain
    All in need of a Bigger Garage............
  • buy a Charge Knife instead and invest the change in a set of DHB shorts ...
    http://www.northcheshireclarion.co.uk/

    Great club in and around the Warrington area.
  • APIII
    APIII Posts: 2,010
    I find the non-gel version comfier. Maybe take a look at the new Romin if you like Specialized saddles. It's got a wider channel running the full length of the saddle and is more contoured than the Toupe.
  • ajb72
    ajb72 Posts: 1,178
    I have run both and can't say I've noticed a huge difference - if anything the standard model seemed to suit me better.
  • ScottieP
    ScottieP Posts: 599
    As an alternative to a Toupe, I've just bought a Phenom SL and have been surprised at how comfortable it is (weighs 205 grammes). I wasn't sure I'd get on with a Toupe and am very pleased with the Phenom.
    My cycling blog: http://girodilento.com/
  • MikeWW
    MikeWW Posts: 723
    ScottieP wrote:
    As an alternative to a Toupe, I've just bought a Phenom SL and have been surprised at how comfortable it is (weighs 205 grammes). I wasn't sure I'd get on with a Toupe and am very pleased with the Phenom.
    Bought a Phenom originally but didn't find it great on the road bike. Moved to a Toupe and get on with that far better. Infact not sure I would use anything else now. I was advised that the difference with the gel one was marginally and that it took a little bit of the buzz out but didn't bother myself
  • ScottieP
    ScottieP Posts: 599
    MikeWW wrote:
    Bought a Phenom originally but didn't find it great on the road bike. Moved to a Toupe and get on with that far better. Infact not sure I would use anything else now. I was advised that the difference with the gel one was marginally and that it took a little bit of the buzz out but didn't bother myself

    Interesting, I'll definitely consider a Toupe for my next bike - I was going from a much heavier more padded seat and just couldn't believe anything lighter than 200 gms would be comfortable enough ....
    My cycling blog: http://girodilento.com/
  • Lagavulin
    Lagavulin Posts: 1,688
    Non-gel for me too.

    I have a Toupe Gel on my Allez and I'd of bought another had the tart in me not decided the red/white Toupe Team would look better on my Izoard. Consequently not only does my Wilier look better but I think it is a better saddle.
    A week or so spent in the garage last winter don't seem to have done the Toupe gel any good. The gel almost seems to have hardened in some places.
  • Scrumple
    Scrumple Posts: 2,665
    toupe or not toupe, that is the question!

    1534584-The-Cheap-Toupe-1.jpg
  • plowmar
    plowmar Posts: 1,032
    O.K. I know never jump to conclusions, but I was wondering what hair pieces had to do with cycling :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: .

    Being decidedly un-hirsute myself I always told my self that it aided in the streamlining which was taken away by the tum. :wink: