Compact or triple?
Stuart123
Posts: 17
I currently use a triple and am wondering how I can ensure I get close to the same range if I were to replace it with a compact...
I can count the teeth on fron (smallest and biggest chain rings) and likewise on the back (smallest and biggest cog).
Then what?
As a general rule, can I expect to get a similar range with bigger gaps or am I going to lose out?
Stuart
I can count the teeth on fron (smallest and biggest chain rings) and likewise on the back (smallest and biggest cog).
Then what?
As a general rule, can I expect to get a similar range with bigger gaps or am I going to lose out?
Stuart
0
Comments
-
smallest front ring on a compact is 33t, although hey usually come with a 34t
and a standard road triple is 30t, although you can go lower
big rings on compacts are usually 50t
triples are 52, usually.
so a triple will always have a bigger range
or put another way, if both setups have the same range, then a triple can do it with smalller gaps.
this argument is well documented, if you do a search all the arguments are there. Basically: compact looks better, lower Q, lower weight, easier setup, triple can have a bigger range, lower lowest gear, higher highest gear and smaller gaps. The difference in the amount of shifting depends on how and where you ride though.Facts are meaningless, you can use facts to prove anything that's remotely true! - Homer0