Team Sky's first mistake

Chip \'oyler

looks like Brailsford's drive for excellence doesn't extend to his Photoshop team!

See if you can see the 'photoshop disaster' on the Dogma interactive photo

http://www.teamsky.com/article/0,27290, ... 60,00.html

schlepcycling

There's no downtube, bottom bracket etc visible behind the chainset and I claim my five pounds.

schlepcycling

Sorry double post........ :oops:

Chip \'oyler

schlepcycling wrote:

There's no downtube, bottom bracket etc visible behind the chainset and I claim my five pounds.

You don't get £10 just cos you said it twice

dodgy

How do you pump the tyres up! (The valves could be behind the stays/fork, but that design of wheel has the valves by the Dura Ace branding I think).

antooony

schlepcycling wrote:

There's no downtube, bottom bracket etc visible behind the chainset and I claim my five pounds.

Beat me to it.

thejesusandsedischain

this is how they are going to get the weight down on the thing to meet wiggos request by doing away with the BB

hopper1

Damn fine looking bike, though...

I wonder if there's any in the sales...... :roll:

Back in a bit

VinceEager

you twonks its just new prototype see through carbon :roll:

markos1963

The carbon got wet and dissolved away.

Steve_b77

The BB is so oversized to create maximum stiffness that it's caused a rift in the space time continuum and is only visible from the non-drive side, duh :!: :!:

Chip \'oyler

I think the Dogma is that asymetrical that the BB shell is behind the photographer

Sirius631

The downtube and rh chainstay are partially there. The lh crank is also missing.

cougie

Which set are we looking at ? The 11 photos of the Pinarello ?

I cant see it. Or cant not see it. :oops: