Breaking the Chain - the book
Comments
-
Pross wrote:many riders don't mature into good stage racers until they are in their late 20's.
How many pre-epo era multiple Tour winners can you name who were as rubbish as Armstrong was (as a Tour rider that is) before he teamed up with Ferrari?0 -
rockmount wrote:Ms Tree wrote:ColinJ wrote:brakelever wrote:sounds a good read ! is it avaible in english
(It's translated from the original French by William Fotheringham.)
You can get it at Amazon.co.uk for under a fiver - link.
How did you guess?????'Google can bring back a hundred thousand answers. A librarian can bring you back the right one.'
Neil Gaiman0 -
BikingBernie wrote:Pross wrote:many riders don't mature into good stage racers until they are in their late 20's.
How many pre-epo era multiple Tour winners can you name who were as rubbish as Armstrong was (as a Tour rider that is) before he teamed up with Ferrari?
But that logic doesn't make any sense. Pre-Ferrari, he was racing relatively clean* and was up against riders juiced up to 60%. It's a bit of a tall order to ask a 21-23 year old to get on the podium under those circumstances - the greats you listed wouldn't have done.
And he wasn't riding for GC in the Tour, just stages (similar story with Indurain). He had some great results in one day races pre-Ferrari and some decent ones in short stage races (kind of like EBH now). If EPO had never existed, then I think he still would have been a serious contender.
It's a complete myth that he was a carthorse before the good doctor came along.
*(if he wasn't there wouldn't have been the great improvement that you say, probably correctly, points to doping)Twitter: @RichN950 -
RichN95 wrote:Pre-Ferrari, he was racing relatively clean* and was up against riders juiced up to 60%. It's a bit of a tall order to ask a 21-23 year old to get on the podium under those circumstancesRichN95 wrote:he wasn't riding for GC in the Tour, just stagesRichN95 wrote:It's a complete myth that he was a carthorse before the good doctor came along.
And he wasn't 'relatively clean' in his pre-Ferrari days. However, dabbling in Epo, testosterone and so on is one thing, the real improvements come with a properly medically managed Epo/ blood doping program - the type that allows you to boost your haemocrit to 58% or more (the figure given by Prentice Steffan, the ex USP team doctor) whilst at the same time ensuring that you don't die in your sleep of a heart attack.0 -
RichN95 wrote:BikingBernie wrote:Pross wrote:many riders don't mature into good stage racers until they are in their late 20's.
How many pre-epo era multiple Tour winners can you name who were as rubbish as Armstrong was (as a Tour rider that is) before he teamed up with Ferrari?
But that logic doesn't make any sense. Pre-Ferrari, he was racing relatively clean* and was up against riders juiced up to 60%. It's a bit of a tall order to ask a 21-23 year old to get on the podium under those circumstances - the greats you listed wouldn't have done.
And he wasn't riding for GC in the Tour, just stages (similar story with Indurain). He had some great results in one day races pre-Ferrari and some decent ones in short stage races (kind of like EBH now). If EPO had never existed, then I think he still would have been a serious contender.
It's a complete myth that he was a carthorse before the good doctor came along.
*(if he wasn't there wouldn't have been the great improvement that you say, probably correctly, points to doping)
...he was near to best triathlete in the world at 16 years old and then wins the TDF. Who would have thunk it??0 -
yes up to cancer Armstrong was always seen as a one day racer. Cofidis signed him to win the world cup that used to run rather than as a tour winner0
-
Dave_1 wrote:...he was near to best triathlete in the world at 16 years old and then wins the TDF. Who would have thunk it??0
-
Just read this. Enjoyed it except for the extreme brevity, it took me about 40-50 minutes to read it which is a pisstake for a book costing a fiver or whatever it was.0