Frames and associated query
lancj1
Posts: 38
Hi, great forum and spent a long time lurking.
I am a middle aged cyclist - have always had a bike, from the old chopper, through racers in the 80s and since the mid 90's mountain bike. I have always been an occasional user though, its never been my passion, and still isnt to be honest, but I love it when I do it. Anyway..
Two years ago I replaced my steel raliegh MB with a Giant Boulder - believe me a significant upgrade. The boulder, whilst clearly way down the scale, has served me well for what I need - very lightweight XC stuff on a weekend with the son, down the shops, an hour out on my own etc. I have now splashed out on a GT Avalanche 1.0 2010 model on the bike scheme - another big upgrade for me (its amazing how works folk say 700 quid on a bike, whilst you lot say, hmm, if you really can only manage 700...)
Anyway, to the point. Frame materials. I hear many people talking about frames/worth upgrading etc, and got the impression from folks I spoke too that my boulder wasnt worth upgrading because of the frame. I have no regrets, but whats the difference beteen the alloys used, and had I spent 700 upgrading my boulder, would I have got a "better" bike than my avalanche. Sorry for rambling, and thanks for any info
I am a middle aged cyclist - have always had a bike, from the old chopper, through racers in the 80s and since the mid 90's mountain bike. I have always been an occasional user though, its never been my passion, and still isnt to be honest, but I love it when I do it. Anyway..
Two years ago I replaced my steel raliegh MB with a Giant Boulder - believe me a significant upgrade. The boulder, whilst clearly way down the scale, has served me well for what I need - very lightweight XC stuff on a weekend with the son, down the shops, an hour out on my own etc. I have now splashed out on a GT Avalanche 1.0 2010 model on the bike scheme - another big upgrade for me (its amazing how works folk say 700 quid on a bike, whilst you lot say, hmm, if you really can only manage 700...)
Anyway, to the point. Frame materials. I hear many people talking about frames/worth upgrading etc, and got the impression from folks I spoke too that my boulder wasnt worth upgrading because of the frame. I have no regrets, but whats the difference beteen the alloys used, and had I spent 700 upgrading my boulder, would I have got a "better" bike than my avalanche. Sorry for rambling, and thanks for any info
Btwin Triban 3
Giant Boulder '08
Raleigh Jackal MTB '95 - Gas Pipe Commuter
Giant Boulder '08
Raleigh Jackal MTB '95 - Gas Pipe Commuter
0
Comments
-
for the materials have a look in the FAQs.
re upgrading the Boulder for 700, not really."Do not follow where the path may lead, Go instead where there is no path, and Leave a Trail."
Parktools :?:SheldonBrown0 -
You can upgrade it. I don't believe that a frame on a £600 bike is any better or worse than a £1200 quid bike,comparing like for like. The extra value comes from the other components such as forks, drivetrain, wheels and all the finishing kit like stems, bars and seatposts.0
-
Some bikes aren't worth upgrading because the money's better spent on a whole new bike, but it's nothing to do with materials, just down to cost efficiency. People get too hung up on materials IMO, it's only a small part of the total picture.Uncompromising extremist0