Which would you prefer to be?

finchy

Personally I'm going for genius. Less painful for the legs.

Anonymous

A great sportsman. Some genius types end up in living in eccentric squalor, poverty or mental institutes.

STEFANOS4784

Went for geat sportsman so i could ride really fast 8)

ride_whenever

are you talking on top of what you are now?

i couldn't cope with being a great sportsman if i was as thick as two short planks.

But I couldn't cope with being a genius if i was completely incapable of exercise.

STEFANOS4784

ride_whenever wrote:

are you talking on top of what you are now?

i couldn't cope with being a great sportsman if i was as thick as two short planks.

But I couldn't cope with being a genius if i was completely incapable of exercise.

Good point, i'd rather be a bit demented and enjoy cycling, as i am and do

finchy

ride_whenever wrote:

are you talking on top of what you are now?

i couldn't cope with being a great sportsman if i was as thick as two short planks.

But I couldn't cope with being a genius if i was completely incapable of exercise.

Let's say genius with average fitness, or sportsman with average intelligence.

By the way, it should be sportsman or woman. Apologies for my disgusting display of sexism there. Unfortunately I can't edit the poll.

STEFANOS4784

With some of the recent threads i'm sure none of the ladies on here will be to offended by that :oops: :roll:

ride_whenever

genius with average fitness. Average fitness will improve with training!

I couldn't handle being dim, i think i'm dim enough already!

Frank the tank

ride_whenever wrote:

are you talking on top of what you are now?

i couldn't cope with being a great sportsman if i was as thick as two short planks.

But I couldn't cope with being a genius if i was completely incapable of exercise.

David Beckham (is a great sportsman wether you like it or not) or Stephen Hawking :!:

ride_whenever

of those two i'd choose hawking tbh

STEFANOS4784

Is suicide an option

Porgy

napoleond wrote:

Some genius types end up in living in eccentric squalor.

I've noticed that

bompington

I find I can manage both, no problem

Matt the Tester

sports legend

northernneil

Porgy wrote:

napoleond wrote:

Some genius types end up in living in eccentric squalor.

I've noticed that

there is strong evidence that madness is very very close to genius, especially in creative people...bethoven, van gough etc

pepelepew

Sportsman.

Sinking the winning put on the 18th at Augusta with Tiger looking on.

Or playing rugby for Wales. Used to pretend I was Gareth Edwards when I was playing as a nipper. My mother sewed a dodgy '9' on the back of my shirt.

Don't remember pretending to be Isaac Newton or Mozart though.

drewfromrisca

I am a genius so it would have to be sportsman.

finchy

I'm going for genius because what you accomplish in your lifetime will potentially last and benefit humanity for centuries.

Also what you achieve is arguably more worthwhile - the discovery of the principle of genetics (taken as a random example of genius) surely has to have more significance in the grand scheme of things that getting round France or to the other end of the athletics track or swimming pool slightly faster than everyone else.

Mind you, I wouldn't turn my nose up at great sportsman.

Stewie Griffin

Never seen a genius with a bevvy of fit burds hanging off him 8)

tarquin_foxglove

Stewie Griffin wrote:

Never seen a genius with a bevvy of fit burds hanging off him 8)

Salman Rushdie's not even a genius & he hasn't done too bad...

takethehighroad

Some great sportsmen are genii (sp?) so definately a sportsman