BMC or SCOTT

jdjonathan
jdjonathan Posts: 3
edited September 2009 in MTB buying advice
Hi there, I'm in the market for a full sus. But cant decide whether to get the BMC TRAILFOX TF01 (09) £1679 from £2999 or the SCOTT SPARK 30 (09) £1899 from £2799.

I wont be doing anything crazy as such, but you never know. Please help, my brain hurts. :shock:

Comments

  • Kiwi Kranker
    Kiwi Kranker Posts: 416
    Scott.

    As you were.
    Scott Ransom 10

    Stumpy FSR Comp

    Wilier Izoard

    1994 Shogun Prairie Breaker Expert...ahhh yesssss

    'I didnt need those front teeth anyway..'
  • andy46
    andy46 Posts: 1,666
    GET THE SCOTT!!!!!

    you know it makes sense :wink:
    2019 Ribble CGR SL

    2015 Specialized Roubaix Sport sl4

    2014 Specialized Allez Sport
  • Jayng
    Jayng Posts: 53
    Scott!
  • jdjonathan
    jdjonathan Posts: 3
    Thanks for the comments, The BMC is in the process of being delivered. If it doesn't look/feel great then its only about 20 quid to send it back.

    Wish I never seen the scott, Its so light :cry:
  • edmiddleton1988
    edmiddleton1988 Posts: 91
    the bmc is a fantastic bike, and probably better quality than the scott. and has a better warranty. think you made a good choice.
  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Posts: 79,666
    Scott

Categories