Seatpost rack mounted to seat tube?

Hi
I've just purchased one of these:
http://www.wiggle.co.uk/p/cycle/7/LifeL ... 360033789/
and discovered it is more practical to clamp it to my bike's (Reynold 531c Ribble Road Bike) seatpost tube rather than the seatpost itself. I'm sure the answer to this question will be 'no', but is there any reason why this is a bad idea?
Cheers
I've just purchased one of these:
http://www.wiggle.co.uk/p/cycle/7/LifeL ... 360033789/
and discovered it is more practical to clamp it to my bike's (Reynold 531c Ribble Road Bike) seatpost tube rather than the seatpost itself. I'm sure the answer to this question will be 'no', but is there any reason why this is a bad idea?
Cheers
0
Posts
I'd've thought it would be fine, but you'd probably want to make sure that the seatpost still protruded far enough into the frame so that it would be under the clamped part.
There is clearance through the rear stay, although - looking at it - there may be an issue with the backs of my legs fouling whatever is mounted on the rack, as the sloping angle of the seat tube means the rack is further forward than it would be if mounted on the seatpost.
Re. your second comment, do you think seat tube alone could be too weak to support the rack without the seatpost inside it?
Cheers
ps. I am a mechanical engineer.
Engineered Bicycles
Depends on the strength of the seat tube, the weight of the load carried, the length of seat tube it's spread over and the how far away the load is from the seat tube!
Seat tubes do often tend to be fairly thin though, and I'd be inclined to err on the safe side.
It's just that because the frame is quite large, with 1980's geometry, I only have about 10cm of seatpost sticking out, meaning there isn't much clearance between the front of the rack and the bottom of the saddle. Oh well.