conveniently forgotten

PauloBets
PauloBets Posts: 108
edited August 2009 in Pro race
We bang on about Lance-who we don't know was + by the two sample process...but riders who have previous + we don't remember them for some reason

1. Legeay

2. Kelly

3. Hinault

Comments

  • Kléber
    Kléber Posts: 6,842
    Speak for yourself but I remember many positive cases over the years. Back in the days a rider would usually be allowed to finish the Grand Tour he was doing, even bagging a win, and then serve a conveniently suspended competition ban for a couple of months during the winter. In other words, no one gave a flying fork.

    Many positive tests in the past were largely for medicines you could get over the counter, riders were using cortisone and amphetamines at a time when the general population at large could walk into a pharmacy and buy these medicines. Indeed up until the late 1960s, amphetamines were advertised as pick me ups for tired factory workers and dozy lorry drivers.

    Ever since the 1990s doping moved onto a new level with the blood manipulation, some managed to ignore the rumours for a while but then the Festina scandal happened and ever since then there has been a different attitude, these days a rider who gets caught is likely to be burned at the stake instead of getting the "shoot, how did he get caught" shrug.
  • donrhummy
    donrhummy Posts: 2,329
    PauloBets wrote:
    We bang on about Lance-who we don't know was + by the two sample process...but riders who have previous + we don't remember them for some reason

    1. Legeay

    2. Kelly

    3. Hinault

    When and for what was Hinault's doping offense?

    BTW, Merckx tested positive twice.