Nibali and Pellizotti sue Fanini
Comments
-
In what respect surprising?"In many ways, my story was that of a raging, Christ-like figure who hauled himself off the cross, looked up at the Romans with blood in his eyes and said 'My turn, sock cookers'"
@gietvangent0 -
I would think surprising that Nibali would be linked to Ferrari, given VN's stance on the doping issue.0
-
celbianchi wrote:I would think surprising that Nibali would be linked to Ferrari, given VN's stance on the doping issue.
Surely then it is unsurprising that he's sueing?
I was puzzled as Iain seemed to be falling into the trap of assuming if somebody points a finger at a cyclist, it must be true."In many ways, my story was that of a raging, Christ-like figure who hauled himself off the cross, looked up at the Romans with blood in his eyes and said 'My turn, sock cookers'"
@gietvangent0 -
This is just a repeat of something that seems to happen all the time. One person says another works with someone who they shouldn't, they sue, it goes away, repeat.0
-
Fanini does seem to have good contacts with who is working with Ferrari though. He's identified a few of the secretive doctor's clients in the past.
Have either of them been seen training in non team kit in the Engadine valley?0 -
As Andyp says, Fanini has called out quite a few of his clients in the past.
Nibs would be surprising but I'm sure I saw a link to FP somewhere in the past.
Nibali said he's never even met Ferrari according to the Procycling tweets.Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.0 -
disgruntledgoat wrote:celbianchi wrote:I would think surprising that Nibali would be linked to Ferrari, given VN's stance on the doping issue.
Surely then it is unsurprising that he's sueing?
I was puzzled as Iain seemed to be falling into the trap of assuming if somebody points a finger at a cyclist, it must be true.
In here thats generally enough for certain posters to state with some certainty that cyclist x or y is on the juice.Gasping - but somehow still alive !0 -
Seeing as two riders deem it serious enough to legal action, can we now agree that it's a slur on someone's reputation to even be linked to Ferrari via a rumour? That's a step in the right direction.
I mean, I don't think Nibali and Pellizotti are hideously embarrassed by being linked to the good Doctor's training plans...0 -
afx237vi wrote:Seeing as two riders deem it serious enough to legal action, can we now agree that it's a slur on someone's reputation to even be linked to Ferrari via a rumour? That's a step in the right direction.
Exactly. Depends whether the suit is about it being a lie or not wanting it public. If it's the former then, as you say, it's good.
Anyway, here's a bit more on it
http://www.ciclonews.it/news_scheda.php?id=18595
It's Eugenio Capodacqua again . The claim was that VN and FP were seeing training being followed by the Myth on a scooter with a stop watch. It was confirmed by Liquigas they were training in Livigno at the time.Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.0 -
The suit is a defamation suit. So it can't be about the publicity, only about the truth of the actual allegation.0
-
avoidingmyphd wrote:The suit is a defamation suit. So it can't be about the publicity, only about the truth of the actual allegation.
Indeed. I was doing some research into it and forgot to update my original statement after reading the article.Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.0 -
Capodcqua's usually pretty good on these things. But the dottorissimo on a scooter with a stopwatch? That's a bit old-skool, he was known to follow Armstrong's Tour de France SRM data by telemetry, he could be a thousand miles away.
Still, as we see even being linked to Ferrari is enough to get some riders speedialling their lawyers to issue denials, such is the man's infamous reputation.0