How important are looks?

13»

Comments

  • turnerjohn
    turnerjohn Posts: 1,069
    think this blog has highlighted the fact that us cyclists are right picky b*ggers !

    bike companies really do have a tough job in specs and colours as we all seem to go for something different....variety the spice of life and all ;-) !

    think what does sum it up tho, "if it looks right it rides right"...aka you feel right !

    not that am at all a tart....especially if its carbon :-)
  • Monkeypump
    Monkeypump Posts: 1,528
    Since Supersonic is confused by my response regarding Hope skewers, I'll explain.

    Without re-reading it, I do believe I mentioned the lack of plastic parts, the steel acorn nuts, the non-issue with exposed cams AND the fact that I've had 1500 trouble-free miles on them BEFORE I wrote the quoted line.

    The fact that they look good IS a secondary concern, and my motivation for responding was the disdain in Sheldon Brown's blog (i.e. the suggestion that 'boutique' skewers had to useles because it would be impossible to look good AND perform well).

    To add something to this discussion, much of the beauty of bikes and components is in their engineering. For me, a well constructed frame or an intricately machined component is the root of good aesthetics.
  • MacAndCheese
    MacAndCheese Posts: 1,944
    Looks are a big part in my choice, I also find frame size can have a massive effect on the way bikes look - I tend to like the look of the smaller size frames which is probably the reason I ride a slightly undersized frame - even though I think I prefer the handling...guess it has something to do with small Dual slalom frames being in fashion when I first got into MTBs back in the late nineties!

    Branding also plays a big part - I'm in the market for a new frame at the mo and there's a certain company that make excellent frames that I can't consider cos I hate there branding graphics! ( I won't name names as I know they have a lot of fans and this is only my second post!)
    Santa Cruz Chameleon
    Orange Alpine 160
  • ride_whenever
    ride_whenever Posts: 13,279
    Or if you look at it the other way, they can make any old thing in any old colour and there'll be someone to buy it...
  • MacAndCheese
    MacAndCheese Posts: 1,944
    Also agree with MonkeyPump that intricately machined parts can look great, I also run hope skewers, but I brought them purely to match the the Hope wheelset I brought.... :oops:
    Santa Cruz Chameleon
    Orange Alpine 160
  • supersonic
    supersonic Posts: 82,708
    edited August 2009
    Monkeypump wrote:
    Since Supersonic is confused by my response regarding Hope skewers, I'll explain.

    Without re-reading it, I do believe I mentioned the lack of plastic parts, the steel acorn nuts, the non-issue with exposed cams AND the fact that I've had 1500 trouble-free miles on them BEFORE I wrote the quoted line.

    The fact that they look good IS a secondary concern, and my motivation for responding was the disdain in Sheldon Brown's blog (i.e. the suggestion that 'boutique' skewers had to useles because it would be impossible to look good AND perform well).

    To add something to this discussion, much of the beauty of bikes and components is in their engineering. For me, a well constructed frame or an intricately machined component is the root of good aesthetics.

    They are still not as effective as Shimano IMO (which are easier to judge the clamping force - hence why so many Hope ones come loose), and as was clearly explained by some users, the cam CAN be an issue. Sheldon explained one of the problems as the size of the mechanisms, and did state that not all 'boutique' skewers came with inferior nuts.
  • joshtp
    joshtp Posts: 3,966
    supersonic wrote:
    I think maybe because I have worked with bikes for a long time, and research them, looks aren't the first thing that draws me in: value and spec does.
    +1
    i like my bike to look good, but its not the be all and end all, id rather it actually BE good. i do have a bit of a thing for white and red though...... hence why i love the 'zochi 44's so much, despite poor performance.
    I like bikes and stuff
  • bomberesque
    bomberesque Posts: 1,701
    Shmano Skerwers rule, and are the opitomy of a nicely engineered piece of kit IMO thus satisfying both criteria. They don't come in shiny colours but black works for me

    as for the rest, I like a nice looking bike, sure. If a bike visually offended me I'm not sure if I would stick with it or not. Then again, beautiful but useless is not where I want to be either. Life is balance

    As for what constitutes attractive, well that is a terribly open question. Generally there's a limit to how much shiny I will find attractive. Ibis Tranny frame. Sure ... beautiful. CB cobalt wheels. Nope ... too flash

    I am old enough (easily....) to have been sucked into the purple anodizing wars of the early 90s but I never was. I still had an early pair of Pace RC35s though, they were the best looking forks anybody had ever made ever in the history of ever. Crap by comparison with the simplest shock forks today of course but god were they pretty!
    Everything in moderation ... except beer
    Beer in moderation ... is a waste of beer

    If riding an XC race bike is like touching the trail,
    then riding a rigid singlespeed is like licking it
    ... or being punched by it, depending on the day
  • Monkeypump
    Monkeypump Posts: 1,528
    But if something can perform well AND look good...?

    Agree with bomberesque on the Pace forks... beauties.
  • supersonic
    supersonic Posts: 82,708
    Monkeypump wrote:
    But if something can perform well AND look good...?

    Agree with bomberesque on the Pace forks... beauties.

    Oh, absolutely. Many people like the raw functionality and beauty of some parts - Thomson stems for example and the CNC ringlets, and classic steel frames.
  • joshtp
    joshtp Posts: 3,966
    some manufacturers just have the knack, GT for example, of making both beutifull and exelent bikes. just look at SS's Zaskar, or my Aggressor. STUNNING! and they ride brilliantly. (at least i presume the zascar does!)
    I like bikes and stuff
  • supersonic
    supersonic Posts: 82,708
    Yeah, it does lol. Many many budget parts though, and I got the frame for a low price.
  • I dont think looks are going to matter soon if these so called summers keep on being as damp, you can barely see my bike for mud these days !! :lol:
  • Well, my last purchase came down to the Merida, or a Commencal combi disc... the Commencal rode slightly better, was marginally lighter - but the thing was ugly beyond belief.

    So I just picked up the Merida and upgraded the dodgy bits... actually, red Hope skewers are next on my shopping list!! ;)
  • projectsome
    projectsome Posts: 4,478
    looks are very important to me but that doesn't mean I'll choose a bike with less good specs.
    FARKBOOK TWATTER Happiness is my fucking mood!
  • SUPERSUTT
    SUPERSUTT Posts: 292
    i personaly think specs over looks is a must you want a bike thats going to last and upgrade as parts wear out or get damaged . like you say we pay a lot of hard earnd cash fo our steads so they have to last . ALL BIKES LOOK THE SAME WHEN CAKED IN MUD . if its not brokern why fix it
    falling off doesn't hurt....its the landing that hurts


    FS Giant Trance X3 (2013)
    FS Specialized Camber 2011 (2011)=(stolen)
    HT Merlin Malt one (sold)
  • fcumok
    fcumok Posts: 283
    Well, my last purchase came down to the Merida, or a Commencal combi disc... the Commencal rode slightly better, was marginally lighter - but the thing was ugly beyond belief.

    So I just picked up the Merida and upgraded the dodgy bits... actually, red Hope skewers are next on my shopping list!! ;)

    Or you could get the superstar ones http://superstar.tibolts.co.uk/product_info.php?cPath=32&products_id=85
  • supersonic
    supersonic Posts: 82,708
    Or shimano and get some nail varnish out ;-)
  • fcumok
    fcumok Posts: 283
    I am addicted to buying red bits for my bike :lol:
  • lm_trek
    lm_trek Posts: 1,470
    fcumok wrote:
    I am addicted to buying red bits for my bike :lol:

    Alan is that you??

    Otherwise known as Hednesfordxcer or Re-Born or Harlquin
  • passout
    passout Posts: 4,425
    According to my wife, not very.
    'Happiness serves hardly any other purpose than to make unhappiness possible' Marcel Proust.
  • fcumok
    fcumok Posts: 283
    lm_trek wrote:
    fcumok wrote:
    I am addicted to buying red bits for my bike :lol:

    Alan is that you??

    Otherwise known as Hednesfordxcer or Re-Born or Harlquin

    My brother's called Alan if that helps??
  • xtreem
    xtreem Posts: 2,965
    60% look
    40% feel, spec.

    Look is very important to me.
    And I can't imagine riding a silver, yellow or brown bike. :?
    But pink, lime green, sky blue, purple and red are awesome colours.
    Offcourse, combined with white parts. 8)
  • Chaz.Harding
    Chaz.Harding Posts: 3,144
    Xtreem wrote:
    But pink, lime green, sky blue, purple and red are awesome colours.
    Offcourse, combined with white parts. 8)
    Sounds like some kinda crazy trifle... :lol:
    Boo-yah mofo
    Sick to the power of rad
    Fix it 'till it's broke
  • fcumok
    fcumok Posts: 283
    Xtreem wrote:
    But pink, lime green, sky blue, purple and red are awesome colours.
    Offcourse, combined with white parts. 8)
    Sounds like some kinda crazy trifle... :lol:

    Trifle bikes are the future :D
  • lawman
    lawman Posts: 6,868
    id love a purple bike with white rims and finishing kit and lime green graphics ...... would look the muts nuts :D
  • i just like my bikes to look fast, im not even sure how i define a bike as looking fast but thats what i like, if the bike looks fast i tend to ride faster.....
    I recon im the tinyest horse you will ever see