32t up front, 16t on rear, but I want to go faster!

capoz77
capoz77 Posts: 503
edited July 2009 in MTB general
Sorry for post hoaring today! this is my final stupid question before the missus drags me into the big house clean :oops:

The main question is going from 32t/16t singlespeed would a 36t/ 11t-32t on rear give me a hard enough gear to get some good flat out speed up without spinning out?

Or as already suggested would a 42T up front with a 11-32 on rear be better?

With singlespeed bolts would the 42t mount in the middle to give a better chainline.

Or do all the winners use 38t up front :shock:

Your thoughts please :lol:

Comments

  • supersonic
    supersonic Posts: 82,708
    I'd get the 42. Roadie bikes have larger chainwheels than this, and you are going to have smaller wheels, reducing the gearing further.

    Mount in the middle.
  • bomberesque
    bomberesque Posts: 1,701
    42:11-32 sounds really high, but actually I think SS is right. That puts your 32:16 equivalent nearly dead center in the cassette at 42:21 and 5 gears up and 3 gears down to give you more variety.

    Still, 42:11 is bloody tall, you should get 40mph out of that before spinning out, I guess.

    my choice would probaly be 36. then you have your 32:16 equivalent at 36:18 as your middle ratio, 4 up and 4 down for flexibility, plus you maintain better ground clearance than with 42, although I'm not completely sure what the difference is in cm. on my geared HT I run 22/36 and 11-32 and I can spin that out, but I don't often get the opportunity to off road
    Everything in moderation ... except beer
    Beer in moderation ... is a waste of beer

    If riding an XC race bike is like touching the trail,
    then riding a rigid singlespeed is like licking it
    ... or being punched by it, depending on the day
  • supersonic
    supersonic Posts: 82,708
    Is about 37 mph to spin out at 120rpm with 44/11. Smaller road tyres will reduce this a little.

    So fora nice 90rpm cadence, may suit flatter, down hill parts.
  • capoz77
    capoz77 Posts: 503
    Superb advice as always :)

    How about a 40t? good mix between the two?

    I've seen an azonic at a cracking price for £16

    http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Mode ... delID=1932

    it doesn't say which is the 94mm 5 bolt, i'm presuming CD is 94mm and ATB is 110mm?

    if so its only £16 :)


    My Heckler struggles in its outer 42t when trying to get a granny gear, i presume its because the chain line is so angled. As i'm mounting this in the middle not on the outer edge I reckon this should have a better chainline even in granny gear?
  • supersonic
    supersonic Posts: 82,708
    Yes, the middle mounting will be a lot better.
  • Jon8a
    Jon8a Posts: 235
    I ride 42:14 on a 26" wheel on the road and don't spin out very often so 42 11 you should be ok.

    but I also ride with a double and bash where my biggest ring is 32t. I do spin out but it's either on easy road/dirt tracks or so steep/technical that I'm reaching for the brakes. 36t should be fine provided you don't do lots of easy fast descents.
  • whyamihere
    whyamihere Posts: 7,715
    For mountain biking, go for the 36t. It's lovely.
  • capoz77
    capoz77 Posts: 503
    Hey guys so I went for an Azonic 37t on offer at chain reaction in the end.

    Perfect :D

    did the manc to blackpool with that upfront and 11-32 on back.

    Plenty of granny action and loads of downhill big stomping action 8)

    Lovely.