Schwalbe Black Jack.1 Folding Tyres

55NF
55NF Posts: 111
edited June 2009 in MTB general
Just fitted some of these 2.1 Schwalbe's and they're more like a 1.8 tyre, very narrow. Is it me or are Schwalbe's all like this?...... a bit on the narrow side. Wish I'd got a 2.35 now, which will be more like a 2.1

My Panarcer Fire XC Pro 2.1 's are what I'm used to & seem fatter [/quote]

Comments

  • Steve Legend
    Steve Legend Posts: 87
    That's interesting cos I just went from the Fire XC Pro 2.1's and got the Fire FR 2.4 and they seem HUGE!! Love em, maybe Panaracers come up big and your Scwalbes come up small??

    You would think they would all be measured the same though wouldn't you? :?
    Me
    Bike
  • 55NF
    55NF Posts: 111
    Yes, you'd think all tyres measure the same.......... but they don't!
  • Chaz.Harding
    Chaz.Harding Posts: 3,144
    Do you have thin rims? This can also affect how big your tyres come up!

    Fatter rim = fatter tyre!
    Boo-yah mofo
    Sick to the power of rad
    Fix it 'till it's broke
  • .blitz
    .blitz Posts: 6,197
    55NF wrote:
    Just fitted some of these 2.1 Schwalbe's and they're more like a 1.8 tyre, very narrow. Is it me or are Schwalbe's all like this
    Schwalbe are not the only ones guilty of this crime but 2.1 Nobby Nics and Racing Ralphs are very skinny, low-volume tyres and the 2.25s are only a bit bigger. Singletrack have tested a bunch of tyres this month and at least half of them are undersize.
  • scotto
    scotto Posts: 381
    my nobby nics are way fatter than my panaracers, bit confused at these postings

Categories