Difference between a standard double and a compact?

dg74
Posts: 656
My bike has a standard double and I was passed yesterday by lads who looked like they weren't even trying (I know it also comes down to levels of fitness, etc) but when I started getting overtaken by mountain bikes I knew something was amiss.
Does a compact offer more than a double? Or is it maybe worth looking for a triple and changing the gears all together?
Or should I just buy a new bike
Does a compact offer more than a double? Or is it maybe worth looking for a triple and changing the gears all together?
Or should I just buy a new bike

0
Comments
-
-
To be honest, I think you should train harder.
A standard double can, in theory, make you go faster than a compact.
The more teeth front and the less rear, the faster you are - provided you are strong enough.
Compact is rather designed for steep mountains, in the flat a standard would be first choice.
How fast do you ride anyway?1,000km+ a month, strictly road.0 -
dg74 wrote:My bike has a standard double and I was passed yesterday by lads who looked like they weren't even trying (I know it also comes down to levels of fitness, etc) but when I started getting overtaken by mountain bikes I knew something was amiss.
Does a compact offer more than a double? Or is it maybe worth looking for a triple and changing the gears all together?
Or should I just buy a new bike
If you're getting into regular Sportive's DG, personally i'd get a 50/34 Compact fitted and possibly a 27 on the back - obviously, if you predominantly ride/race/train on the flat then a Double is a better option. Training's crucial either way.0 -
cheers lads. I sort of new the answer would be more training and it's just a matter of me fitting this in to my schedule (I really have no reason not to - just being a lazy git
)
I also now have to book the bike into my local lbs due to a knocking coming from the crank area when I peddle. Oh god...please don't let this be expensive!!!0