Is Lance overdoing the upper body work?

Ramanujan
Ramanujan Posts: 352
edited December 2008 in Pro race
Looks like he's going to be carrying a lot of that muscle up some pretty big climbs this year:

3082467304_283b20f45f.jpg


3082467260_d9a60c0886.jpg


3081626841_09ca6f8b33.jpg
«1

Comments

  • 6288
    6288 Posts: 131
    it's just the low body fat count that's making him look that ripped ... when you look at his actual biceps and forearms he's not got alot of mass there ...

    i'm wondering where you got the pics ... got a link?

    (ps. why are they in black & white ... it makes them a touch homo-erotic does it not ... has Bruce Weber has taken over from Graeme Watson?)
  • http://www.elizabethkreutz.com/main.php
    He's looking in decent nick..
  • squired
    squired Posts: 1,153
    I would imagine that as the new season progresses he will lose muscle from his upper body as he trains it less. Thus any mass he has there right now doesn't really matter. What's important is that he is fit and already lean.
  • he's doing the rocky balboa thing of being old so just picking up hench muscles instead!
  • Robert Millar would have a heart attack seeing a bike rider with an upper body developed like that. I seem to remember Millar saying that muscled arms weighed more than non muscled arms and for this reason he avoided weight training like the plague.


    PS Elizabeth Kreutz's name crops up on LA's latest twitter reports. I believe she is second in command for the Lance Armstrong Foundation. So basically Lance gets one of his most senior employees to stand around all day taking vanity photos whilst he trains. Brings a whole new meaning to the phrase, "does a lot of good work for charity" ...
    aspra nella virtu', dolce nel sacrificio
  • oldwelshman
    oldwelshman Posts: 4,733
    padonbike wrote:
    Robert Millar would have a heart attack seeing a bike rider with an upper body developed like that. I seem to remember Millar saying that muscled arms weighed more than non muscled arms and for this reason he avoided weight training like the plague.

    Thats why Armstrong won 7 tours and Millar none!!
  • donrhummy
    donrhummy Posts: 2,329
    He's DEFINITELY bigger now in the upper body. I think he'll lose most of it though.

    fe_1_b.JPG

    (And no, that is not my picture. I have no idea what's going on behind that magazine.)
  • Ooooh..........a fanboy porn thread! :shock:
    "Science is a tool for cheaters". An anonymous French PE teacher.
  • Kléber
    Kléber Posts: 6,842
    Up periscope, sailor :wink:
  • Look, Armstrong is not gay, he just has a bit of trouble keeping his women happy / keeping his women, and he likes running in public with his shirt off alongside a bare-chested running buddy. Don`t those torsos look nicely waxed? :wink:

    matthew%20mcconaughey%20lance%20armstrong.jpg
  • DaveyL
    DaveyL Posts: 5,167
    Is that one from your private collection, aurelio?
    Le Blaireau (1)
  • smoo
    smoo Posts: 25
    I think the lighting and the use of high contrast B&W is greatly exaggerating things...
  • Armstrong always had a slightly bigger uppper body due probably to his early Triathalon days, the swim etc.
  • shazzz
    shazzz Posts: 1,077
    Errr......


    001088032.jpg
  • Armstrong always had a slightly bigger uppper body due probably to his early Triathalon days, the swim etc.
    But I thought he lost that upper body mass when he had cancer and that's why his power/weight ratio went up and he could climb so much better?
  • derby
    derby Posts: 114
    SunWuKong wrote:
    Armstrong always had a slightly bigger uppper body due probably to his early Triathalon days, the swim etc.
    But I thought he lost that upper body mass when he had cancer and that's why his power/weight ratio went up and he could climb so much better?
    :lol: :twisted: :wink: troublemaker.

    Don't dare mention that a sign of hgh use is protruding abdominals because of increased internal organ growth.
  • Tom Butcher
    Tom Butcher Posts: 3,830
    But the experts on the training section keep telling us there is no point in weight training for cycling.

    it's a hard life if you don't weaken.
  • Kléber
    Kléber Posts: 6,842
    It's one thing to build an upper body to impress the latest bimbo C-list celebrity your trying to bed, another thing to have a power-weight ratio good enough to drop Sastre, Andy Schleck, Contador, Menchov and Evans.
  • Kléber wrote:
    It's one thing to build an upper body to impress the latest bimbo C-list celebrity your trying to bed, another thing to have a power-weight ratio good enough to drop Sastre, Andy Schleck, Contador, Menchov and Evans.

    Don't make me choose....
    "In many ways, my story was that of a raging, Christ-like figure who hauled himself off the cross, looked up at the Romans with blood in his eyes and said 'My turn, sock cookers'"

    @gietvangent
  • But the experts on the training section keep telling us there is no point in weight training for cycling.

    laughable, ain't it? :)
  • 6288
    6288 Posts: 131
    although Lance was dating Kate Hudson when she was voted the most beautiful woman in America ... at which point she promptly dumped him ... a few weeks later his comeback was on the go ... i guess Lance knows to get everything in order for 2045!
  • iainf72
    iainf72 Posts: 15,784
    6288 wrote:
    although Lance was dating Kate Hudson when she was voted the most beautiful woman in America ... at which point she promptly dumped him ... a few weeks later his comeback was on the go ... i guess Lance knows to get everything in order for 2045!

    Except he dumped her, eh?
    Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.
  • 6288
    6288 Posts: 131
    as far as i was aware she dumped himas she was harking after Luke Wilson, her ex ...
  • Bloody hell, you could ask them both later on when their respective gangs of mates are hanging around at opposite ends of the playground swigging diamond white and smoking crafty tabs... Or buy a copy of Hello.
    "In many ways, my story was that of a raging, Christ-like figure who hauled himself off the cross, looked up at the Romans with blood in his eyes and said 'My turn, sock cookers'"

    @gietvangent
  • But the experts on the training section keep telling us there is no point in weight training for cycling.
    Yes they have gone a bit quite, wonder why. :roll:
    ding dang do
  • Isn't Armstrong only about 5 feet tall anyway? So it's probably not that impressive.

    :lol:
    "A cyclist has nothing to lose but his chain"

    PTP Runner Up 2015
  • The last two posts from disgruntledgoat are two of my favourite posts of all time.
  • girofan
    girofan Posts: 137
    Yes his upper body does look bigger. Especially above the neck!!!!!
    I say what I like and I like what I say!
  • girofan wrote:
    Yes his upper body does look bigger. Especially above the neck!!!!!

    BAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    "A cyclist has nothing to lose but his chain"

    PTP Runner Up 2015
  • dennisn
    dennisn Posts: 10,601
    Kléber wrote:
    It's one thing to build an upper body to impress the latest bimbo C-list celebrity your trying to bed, another thing to have a power-weight ratio good enough to drop Sastre, Andy Schleck, Contador, Menchov and Evans.

    Don't make me choose....

    Best answer ever. :lol::lol:


    Dennis Noward