My first accident and some suprising trousers!

gradiric

Ha, knew if I numbered the list someone would be tempted in....

giltkid

7. The people who feel the need to make lists

gradiric

8. Those that feel the need to add to other's...

giltkid

9. The ones who have to have the last word

Harry B

10. The one who prevents others from having the last word

Jen J

10. The ones that type 'The End' in the hope that it will be.

The End.

damage36

I ride on the pavement all the time!











In America HAHAH....

:oops: :arrow:

tailwindhome

Jen J wrote:

gradiric wrote:

I love these moral standpoint issues. It seems to divide the forum into set categories:
1. The conformists: upholding the moral standards
2. The legal eagles: well the law says...
3. The on-the-fencers: always give both sides of the argument, never decide
4. The liberalists: relax, who needs laws, let people get on with what they want to do
5. The antagonists: take the opposing view just for a reaction/argument (regardless of consistency or own standpoint)

You forgot 6. The silent majority, who roll their eyes at yet another pointless debate and stay away...;)

Its 2pm, Friday in a boring job from which I'm being made redundant anyway

Pointless debate is a Lifeline!


Seems to me like riding a bike when pi55ed isnt a particularly smart thing to do!

Why would you risk your own safety just for a couple of pints?

Why have a lower standard for riding a bike v driving a car?

Harry B

I've got a pub bike specially to take me to and (hopefully) from the pub rather than driving.

Some are gonna love this but when I ride back from the pub because the pub bike has no lights I tend to cycle on the pavement :shock:

So that's 3 offences:
1. cycling p1ssed
2. cycling with no lights late at night
3 cycling on the pavement

Does that make me the most evil person to ever walk this planet :?

tailwindhome

Harry B wrote:

I've got a pub bike specially to take me to and (hopefully) from the pub rather than driving.

Some are gonna love this but when I ride back from the pub because the pub bike has no lights I tend to cycle on the pavement :shock:

So that's 3 offences:
1. cycling p1ssed
2. cycling with no lights late at night
3 cycling on the pavement

Does that make me the most evil person to ever walk this planet :?

No just likely to get yourself killed

Think it through

I'm too drunk to ride my bike on the road
I've no lights so no one can see me

I think I'll ride on the pavement where the pedestrians are



Now I agree this may be a perfectly sensible train of thought when you are the proverbial 'one over the eight'

But to actually buy a bike to especially for this cunning plan

Harry B

Pub bike is old bike, demoted MTB in fact. Hence no lights, the lights would be worth more than the bike. The idea is that if it gets nicked or I forget its there it doesn't really matter too much. Surely this is not a new concept? I've heard of pub bikes being mentioned over on Cake Stop a few times

batch78

11. Spen666

Oh my HarryB, you must be forced to carry a placard reading, I AM NOT A CYCLIST, what levels will forumites drop too next!!

You evil, horrible, naughty, wicked man.

:shock:

feel

Hi damned in flames, i'm dead impressed with my aldi trousers as well, can't comment on how well they take the ground though, as i just ride over the top of the pedestrians

tailwindhome

batch78 wrote:

11. Spen666

Oh my HarryB, you must be forced to carry a placard reading, I AM NOT A CYCLIST, what levels will forumites drop too next!!

You evil, horrible, naughty, wicked man.

:shock:

Now thats just stupid

He's pi55ed as a fart

Can't see where he's going

Trying to dodge pedestrians

And you want him to carry a placard too?

Harry B

WheezyMcChubby wrote:

batch78 wrote:

11. Spen666

Oh my HarryB, you must be forced to carry a placard reading, I AM NOT A CYCLIST, what levels will forumites drop too next!!

You evil, horrible, naughty, wicked man.

:shock:

Now thats just stupid

He's pi55ed as a fart

Can't see where he's going

Trying to dodge pedestrians

And you want him to carry a placard too?

No need for the placard. If I can still speak I'll just shout "I'm not a cyclist" as I run the bloody pedestrains over. Then they won't blame all those morally uptight (sorry, that should be "upright") cyclists on here

tailwindhome

Harry B wrote:

WheezyMcChubby wrote:

batch78 wrote:

11. Spen666

Oh my HarryB, you must be forced to carry a placard reading, I AM NOT A CYCLIST, what levels will forumites drop too next!!

You evil, horrible, naughty, wicked man.

:shock:

Now thats just stupid

He's pi55ed as a fart

Can't see where he's going

Trying to dodge pedestrians

And you want him to carry a placard too?

No need for the placard. If I can still speak I'll just shout "I'm not a cyclist" as I run the bloody pedestrains over. Then they won't blame all those morally uptight (sorry, that should be "upright") cyclists on here

damnedinflames

I must admit I wasn't expecting so many replies to my first post - thanks for all the comments opinions and even a few lols !

thanks again for all the welcomes - look forward to chatting with you all some more

El Gordo

gradiric wrote:

I love these moral standpoint issues. It seems to divide the forum into set categories:
1. The conformists: upholding the moral standards
2. The legal eagles: well the law says...
3. The on-the-fencers: always give both sides of the argument, never decide
4. The liberalists: relax, who needs laws, let people get on with what they want to do
5. The antagonists: take the opposing view just for a reaction/argument (regardless of consistency or own standpoint)

I'm normally a laissez faire number 3 but the more 1's and 2's I encounter the more I become a 4 or 5. It must be a subconcious effort to keep things balanced.

Personally I think over regulation and emphasis on rules degrades the individuals sense of responsibility and judgement and so is ultimately a BAD THING.

gtvlusso

So, they were the right trousers,....rather than The Wrong Trousers..