The end of MANkind?

NervexProf

Worrying this!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main ... do2702.xml

Does this herald the extinction of dustman?

My pet hate: Chairperson - and yours?

Parsnip49

Blah, feminists need to settle down and get back in the bloody kitchen.


"if this was the 1950s you would have two black eyes by now, go and make my dinner"

claash

Isn't that the whole point as the bloggers go on....... the "sensible" feminists really don't care that much. it is PC do gooders that have suggested this. :roll:

I am certainly part of mankind (even if I do wear high heels and carry a hand bag) 8)
OK I may have upset a whole new group of people with that comment!! Sorry I was trying to make it clear that I am female or is that fekind or feperson

Where will it all end?? :roll: :roll:

Mike Healey

claash wrote:

Isn't that the whole point as the bloggers go on....... the "sensible" feminists really don't care that much. it is PC do gooders that have suggested this. :roll:

I am certainly part of mankind (even if I do wear high heels and carry a hand bag) 8)
OK I may have upset a whole new group of people with that comment!! Sorry I was trying to make it clear that I am female or is that fekind or feperson

Where will it all end?? :roll: :roll:

Can't be feperson, shurely? Perhaps feper(non-gender specific end syllable) - feperbeing?

On the other hand, if "man" is to be rejected, surely then "fe-" is also appallingly sexist. Which leads us to "??perbeing". Linguistically sensitive suggestions welcomed.

No timewasters, please.

stephenballantyne

Hurrah! That means my 'man-bag' is now simply...a bag

Parsnip49

stephenballantyne wrote:

Hurrah! That means my 'man-bag' is now simply...a bag

does that mean it is no longer for gay men, its just for gays?