How do you seperate?

getdownmonkeyman

Been scouting about today looking at the Trek 4500 and GT Avalanche 2.0. Seems to be nothing between them, both comfortable, good gear and generally nothing to choose between them.

The majority of my riding will pathways, tow paths etc, with the odd muddy trail thrown in for good measure.

What say you the experienced ones?!

PS

Hello, first post and all, please be gentle!

supersonic

One has discs, the other doesnt, that is the main differentiator! Do you need the power of discs for your riding? If not, the Trek could be the better buy - lighter frame, 9spd gears (not 8 ) and lighter overall.

ratty2k

If you like 'em both on the test ride, get the one you like the look of best. I'd go for discs everytime, its a much easier upgrade if the hubs/ frame/ forks are already equipped with the mounts to do so... and you will want to upgrade!

BlackSpur

IIRC the 4500 is all set for discs if you wanted to make the upgrade in the future.

supersonic

Yep, Trek is disc ready! Lovely frame too, and with 9spd I think makes a great entry level XC bike.

liam333

The hubs on the trek won't be disc ready though. I had a specialized hardrock that had mounts but the hubs haven't got disc mounts, just a way they can cut costs but make it look like it can be upgraded easily I suppose.

supersonic

But this aint a hardrock! The hubs are six bolt disc hubs lol.

getdownmonkeyman

Thanks all. Went for the Trek in the end. Slight preference to the bike and really liked the guys at Harry Hall.

Get it this Friday and am ready to rock!