WTF????
davelakers
Posts: 762
0
Comments
-
Time Trial bike from the mid-late 80's - it was perceived that the head down position gave aerodynamic advantages.Carlsberg don't make cycle clothing, but if they did it would probably still not be as good as Assos0
-
Slow Downcp wrote:Time Trial bike from the mid-late 80's - it was perceived that the head down position gave aerodynamic advantages.
Looks bloody painful.................0 -
Before the advent of tri-bars, 'funny bikes' for serious TTs were the norm - based on Francesco Moser's hour record bike, which had something like a 40" rear wheel. When tri-bars arrived, you hade a few 'mongrels' like this, but they soon fell out of favour - particularly when the UCI decreed that all race bikes are to have 2 equally sized wheels.Make mine an Italian, with Campagnolo on the side..0
-
davelakers wrote:
a bag of sh*te ?0 -
These were all the rage at the highest level after Moser's hour record (subsequently retrospecitvely downgraded by the UCI.) Lots of other crazy stuff went on in bike design until as Monty says, the party poopers at UCI stamped it out with the arbitrary requirement that a bike had to have wheels of the same size. Sosenka, who is 6ft 6, was able to get a similar sort of position on a UCI-legal bike with an low front end and extremely extended saddle position.0