Rugby Question...

jimmythecuckoo
jimmythecuckoo Posts: 4,719
edited March 2008 in The bottom bracket
I am struggling to decide which one I am into at the moment. Union was my first Rugby experience, but damn that "Superleague" is fast and furious and exciting...

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

Comments

  • cee
    cee Posts: 4,553
    i know the superleague game flows a lot faster, with less of the stoppy starty, but for me the tactical union game is better.
    Whenever I see an adult on a bicycle, I believe in the future of the human race.

    H.G. Wells.
  • jimmythecuckoo
    jimmythecuckoo Posts: 4,719
    There is more of a tactical element, but all that slowing down in the rolling maul (or whatever it is called) is less interesting to watch than the flowing ball through hands stuff of the League version.

    I suppose it is ok to like both ?
  • Harry B
    Harry B Posts: 1,239
    Union is definately the more tactical and technical game and in my view, for those reasons, the greatest team sport there is.
  • heavymental
    heavymental Posts: 2,094
    I'm a union man myself. I appreciate League and will watch the odd game but I think Union has more variety and interest. You do get dull games of course. As with any sport.
  • redddraggon
    redddraggon Posts: 10,862
    What? League is a proper sport?

    I always thought it was training exercise for Union.
    I like bikes...

    Twitter
    Flickr
  • jimmythecuckoo
    jimmythecuckoo Posts: 4,719
    Jason Robinson has gone back to it...
  • Clever Pun
    Clever Pun Posts: 6,778
    North Vs South question a bit there

    I grew up playing Union and it's a better more rounded game imo. league is too much like american football.
    Purveyor of sonic doom

    Very Hairy Roadie - FCN 4
    Fixed Pista- FCN 5
    Beared Bromptonite - FCN 14
  • popette
    popette Posts: 2,089
    I voted league.
    I just don't get union - what's with all the ploughing in and lying on top of each other?
  • CHRISNOIR
    CHRISNOIR Posts: 1,400
    popette wrote:
    ... what's with all the ploughing in and lying on top of each other?

    The concept of 'Rugby' is just an excuse...
    :wink:
  • jimmythecuckoo
    jimmythecuckoo Posts: 4,719
    Are you saying there is some Homero work at play here?
  • redddraggon
    redddraggon Posts: 10,862
    popette wrote:
    I just don't get union - what's with all the ploughing in and lying on top of each other?

    They do exactly the same in League though.
    I like bikes...

    Twitter
    Flickr
  • Harry B
    Harry B Posts: 1,239
    popette wrote:
    I voted league.
    I just don't get union - what's with all the ploughing in and lying on top of each other?

    It goes back to those public schools where Union is played :wink:
  • popette
    popette Posts: 2,089
    I don't know the rules of union and only vaguely know something about league, but when I've watched league someone gets tackled and the players get up pretty much straight away and play continues. With Union, someone gets tackled and you just get a pile up of bodies for a bit. Quite nice to watch all those fiit bods on top of each other but I do wonder kind of a sport is this?

    How did they come up with the rules? Harry and Mr Noir are on to something :wink:
  • No contest..league aaargh..the reason why the decline in welsh rugby became an avalanche in the early nineties and carried on until the game became professional...
  • redddraggon
    redddraggon Posts: 10,862
    popette wrote:
    I don't know the rules of union and only vaguely know something about league, but when I've watched league someone gets tackled and the players get up pretty much straight away and play continues.

    Most of the time in league the tackling player will lie on the tackled player for a few seconds to slow the opposition from playing the ball. This delay from the tackler, gives precious time for his defence to get into position ready for the next passage of play.

    So in League, they lie on each on purpose. In Union they only pile up on the floor because they've knocked off their feet.

    I don't find League too interesting. All it is run, tackle, run, tackle, run, tackle, run, tackle, run, tackle, kick, and then the opposition repeat until eventually someone scores. At least in Union you are allowed to compete for the ball, after a tackle.
    I like bikes...

    Twitter
    Flickr
  • oldwelshman
    oldwelshman Posts: 4,733
    Jason Robinson has gone back to it...

    He has not gone back to play, just as an ambassador.

    I played union for years from a young age.
    When played "correctly" it is more exciting than league.
    Unfortunately for the last few years, due to certain teams ( England for example :D ) learned that b utilising league coaches, they could stifle oponents by "spread" defending and rely on panalties to win. Union has 15 players, league 13 so when you only commit minimum numbers to rucks and mauls if really minimises attacking chances, this makes it bloody boring to watch though.
    England managed to win th eworld cup playing this method but it hardly looks entertaining to none "rugby" viewers who probably get bored stiff watching.
    I actually enjoy watching league and it is more consistent for entertainment, union is a bit hit or miss.
    I do enjoy watching the super 14 who definately play attacking rugby, contrast to Guniess league.
    NZ, France, South Africa and sometimes Wales normally provide decent entertainment value in games so I enjoy watching those teams.
  • redddraggon
    redddraggon Posts: 10,862
    Exciting attacking rugby, last time the grand slam came around:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pgdgJjvshfQ

    Hopefully we'll get the same tomorrow.
    I like bikes...

    Twitter
    Flickr