Some justice!
At last a judge with some intelligence. He got 9 months and not the full 2 years but it's a start. Recognising road rage involving a cyclist is a step up in my estimation:
http://www.bikeradar.com/news/article/m ... list-13370
http://www.bikeradar.com/news/article/m ... list-13370
0
Comments
-
this was discussed on here some weeks ago mate- keep upWant to know the Spen666 behind the posts?
Then read MY BLOG @ http://www.pebennett.com
Twittering @spen_6660 -
ah fair enough, bit behind with that thanks!0
-
giant mancp wrote:ah fair enough, bit behind with that thanks!
To go back to your original point.
I would say recognising road rage is a step forward. The fact this case involved a cyclist is co-incidental. road rage is wrong irrespective of who it is by and who the victim isWant to know the Spen666 behind the posts?
Then read MY BLOG @ http://www.pebennett.com
Twittering @spen_6660