Vogelzang Committee on the UCI

iainf72
iainf72 Posts: 15,784
edited November 2007 in Pro race
"The UCI is insufficiently precise, insufficiently unambiguous, insufficiently coordinated, insufficiently effective and overly random with respect to its formulation and application of its own anti-doping regulations and sanctions measures."

Nice.
Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.

Comments

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Posts: 79,666
    Wonder how much this committee cost to tell us what we already knew.
    Who paid the bill?
  • vermooten
    vermooten Posts: 2,697
    I imagine that "insufficiently precise, insufficiently unambiguous, insufficiently coordinated, insufficiently effective" apply to almost any institution - including the NHS, civil service, universities etc. I see this kind of thing all the time - death by sub-committee, steering group, worries about individuals' "sensitivities".... It's amazing that the UCI is able to implement any change at all.
    You just have to ride like you never have to breathe again.

    Manchester Wheelers
  • hammerite
    hammerite Posts: 3,408
    Anton de Lacey wrote:
    Wonder how much this committee cost to tell us what we already knew.
    Who paid the bill?

    As it was an independent enquiry set up by Rabobank I'd imagine that Rabobank paid for it.

Categories