Chickens on fire

2»

Comments

  • Beatmaker
    Beatmaker Posts: 1,092
    Monty Dog, has anyone ever mentioned you are an arrogant, ill informed imbecile?

    People's (real people, not those that live in a virtual world and spend more time posting on forums than riding a bike) lives depend on a regular wage from Cedric, not something to be made light of on a public cycling forum. Or maybe your hugely successful business could employ them?

    Go back to bragging about beating Dynamo riders up Box Hill.

    Idiot.
  • PhilofCas
    PhilofCas Posts: 1,153
    Beatmaker wrote:
    Monty Dog, has anyone ever mentioned you are an arrogant, ill informed imbecile?

    People's (real people, not those that live in a virtual world and spend more time posting on forums than riding a bike) lives depend on a regular wage from Cedric, not something to be made light of on a public cycling forum. Or maybe your hugely successful business could employ them?

    Go back to bragging about beating Dynamo riders up Box Hill.

    Idiot.

    oooo, steady, no one got hurt, that's the main thing, really sorry if you've lost your job or you know someone who has, people lose their jobs all the time, there's other employers out there
  • pliptrot
    pliptrot Posts: 582
    Beatmaker,

    I'd be of the mind to second your comments if I could:

    1. understand what MD has written (i.e. decode the poor grammar, wrong syntax and so-on), and;
    2. imagine such parochial writing came from someone with such experience as indicated - those who do have $100m businesses under their arm are not normally so provincial, so I guess it's down to luck, which rather undermines the authority of the authors claims.

    But I think you've made a good point; if you're going to be truculent and antagonistic, be nice to those who you think you're better than. Monty Dog; there are some of us who are even cleverer than you, and still like steel frames and Brooks saddles.
  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Posts: 79,665
    pliptrot wrote:
    Beatmaker,

    I'd be of the mind to second your comments if I could:

    1. understand what MD has written (i.e. decode the poor grammar, wrong syntax and so-on), and;
    2. imagine such parochial writing came from someone with such experience as indicated - those who do have $100m businesses under their arm are not normally so provincial, so I guess it's down to luck, which rather undermines the authority of the authors claims.

    But I think you've made a good point; if you're going to be truculent and antagonistic, be nice to those who you think you're better than. Monty Dog; there are some of us who are even cleverer than you, and still like steel frames and Brooks saddles.

    Oh deary me.

    .

Categories