Forum home Mountain biking forum MTB buying advice

Carrera Vulcan vs GT Aggressor XC3

02walkerj02walkerj Posts: 80
edited October 2007 in MTB buying advice
Carrera Vulcan
here the halfords link: ... ryrn_82394

I think the one in store has a silver fram, which i think looks better.

GT Aggressor XC3
Heres the Halfords link: ... ryrn_82394

I think one of these bike are best for around £200, but if you know of any others please tell me.
Thanks for any help.


  • The Big CheeseThe Big Cheese Posts: 8,651 Forum Tart 2010
    Its a tough one - very similar spec and the vulcan score best in class with WMB a few issues back...

    Personally I would go with the GT - the reason for this is you have a proven frame geometry and it's perfect to upgrade on when bits wear out etc......
  • bullcrossbullcross Posts: 274
    both good speced bikes :wink:
    focus superbud
  • Steve_b77Steve_b77 Posts: 1,680
    I bought my missus a Aggressor 3.0XC and it's a really nice bike, BTW I have a Aggressor 2.0XC and i love it long time :lol:
  • I have had the same dilema and looked seroiusly at the Agressor but only had up to a 20 " frame at Halfords, and when I tried it compared to the Vulcan it still felt a little cramped for me as i'm 6'3" tall, so going for the 22" Vulcan, but it may be good for you as I agree the spec is great for the extra £50 ish and its a better name and all that, but i'm going the Vulcan route as I originally said no more than £200 as my limit and like the stopping of the disc brakes, also the frame is a little tougher 7005 aluminium too, so great to upgrade in the future.
    essexmirage :D
    Still loving my Carrera Vulcan but also loving my commuter converted Raleigh Record Sprint ooo it's so quick and a great commute hack yippeee get to ride it again in the morning . . . . . can't wait ha ha
Sign In or Register to comment.