Zabel not welcome at Worlds

iainf72
iainf72 Posts: 15,784
edited August 2007 in Pro race
http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/14082007/ ... ships.html

Doping confessions really confuse the Germans.
Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.

Comments

  • Kléber
    Kléber Posts: 6,842
    Since we're doing religion regarding Betsy Andreu elsewhere, perhaps It's the Protestant ethic that makes them want to punish people? Whereas in more latin countries other riders can confess, people shrug their shoulders, and that's it.
  • ricadus
    ricadus Posts: 2,379
    I wonder how quickly British Cycling could organize an alternative WC at Celtic Manor if given the nod by the UCI should the German govt carry out its threat to scupper the Stuttgart event?

    :lol:
  • andyp
    andyp Posts: 10,549
    What a ridiculous decision. I'm sure there will be plenty of riders at the Worlds with known dodgy connections, either directly or indirectly, yet the one German rider man enough to admit he'd doped is made unwelcome.

    Talk about efficiousness. :roll:
  • Langenberg
    Langenberg Posts: 453
    Kléber wrote:
    Since we're doing religion regarding Betsy Andreu elsewhere, perhaps It's the Protestant ethic that makes them want to punish people? Whereas in more latin countries other riders can confess, people shrug their shoulders, and that's it.

    As an aside, the whole of the West/South of Germany is catholic while the North and the East tends to be protestant.... overall it is about 50/50 catholic/protestant.
    =====================
    Pas de progrŠs sans peigne.
  • Langenberg
    Langenberg Posts: 453
    andyp wrote:
    What a ridiculous decision. I'm sure there will be plenty of riders at the Worlds with known dodgy connections, either directly or indirectly, yet the one German rider man enough to admit he'd doped is made unwelcome.

    Talk about efficiousness. :roll:

    Well, the problem is that the worlds get public subsidies... and the politicians don't want to be seen as being connected to a sport with doping issues.

    They also said that Valverde is not welcome although when asked re Kloeden, the sports mayor of Stuttgart said that they could not prejudge... which shows the difficulty of singling out certain people.
    =====================
    Pas de progrŠs sans peigne.
  • espoir
    espoir Posts: 61
    Is he not allowed to ride or is he just not welcome? :)
  • timoid.
    timoid. Posts: 3,133
    I think that the rule should be that anyone who has doped cannot ride the world's and anyone currently under investigation cannot either.

    Valverde is not currently being investigated (AFAIK) so should be allowed to race. Neither is Kloeden.

    Di Luca, Petacchi, Piepoli should not be allowed on the start line. Zabel neither, but it must be consistent.


    BTW: Does anyone seriously think Zabel took EPO once and then didn't touch another naughty substance for the rest of his career? He only didn't continue to use EPO as it didn't agree with him.
    It's a little like wrestling a gorilla. You don't quit when you're tired. You quit when the gorilla is tired.
  • iainf72
    iainf72 Posts: 15,784
    I like this quote

    Susanne Eisemann, president of the Stuttgart organising committee “I'm against it, even if we can't do anything from a legal point of view.” she stated.

    I think it's rich when people get uppity about doping, which is rule breaking basically, and then would be happy enough to not follow the rules themselves.

    Have they stopped all athletics events in Germany yet? Another positive reported today.
    Fckin' Quintana … that creep can roll, man.
  • moray_gub
    moray_gub Posts: 3,328
    Timoid. wrote:
    I think that the rule should be that anyone who has doped cannot ride the world's and anyone currently under investigation cannot either.

    So you think David Millar should be banned for riding for GB even after having served his punishment ?

    cheers
    MG
    Gasping - but somehow still alive !
  • There seems to be something of a stance from Germany at the moment, and i'm not convinced about Sinkewitz's "I reached-for-the -patch-without-thinking" crap. There is a reason why T Mobile haven't just run away yet, there's a political will in the mix somewhere.
  • timoid.
    timoid. Posts: 3,133
    Moray Gub wrote:

    So you think David Millar should be banned for riding for GB even after having served his punishment ?

    cheers
    MG


    Got it in one.

    He's not welcome on the olympic team. He should not represent your country at the world's either and while you're at it ban him from future national championships.

    As for his trade team he can represent a mexican food chain if he likes. That's their decision.
    It's a little like wrestling a gorilla. You don't quit when you're tired. You quit when the gorilla is tired.
  • moray_gub
    moray_gub Posts: 3,328
    Timoid. wrote:
    Moray Gub wrote:

    So you think David Millar should be banned for riding for GB even after having served his punishment ?

    cheers
    MG


    Got it in one.

    He's not welcome on the olympic team. He should not represent your country at the world's either and while you're at it ban him from future national championships.

    As for his trade team he can represent a mexican food chain if he likes. That's their decision.

    I think youre being a tad harsh he has served his punishment, i see no purpose in punishing him further by banning him from those events.

    cheers
    MG
    Gasping - but somehow still alive !
  • Langenberg
    Langenberg Posts: 453
    iainf72 wrote:
    Have they stopped all athletics events in Germany yet? Another positive reported today.


    Well, they haven't of course, but more questions are definitely being asked about other sports as well and the perception of the public is that it is not just cycling. Triathlon had a few scandals with Kai Hundertmark (remember him? ex Telekom cycle pro turned ironman triathlete) being banned from the Frankfurt Ironman plus questions around Lothar Leder, prob Germany's most distinguished Ironman. The Frankfurt Ironman organisers take a stance that if they are not happy with the blood profile of an athlete or that athlete has not signed an anti doping declaration, they ban them from all competitions they organise, whether that athlete is strictly speaking positive or not.

    ARD have just broadcasted what appears to be very in depth review of doping across sports. Questions are also being asked re boxing which has been a big sport for the public broadcasters.... whether this will ever mean that athletics or, God forbid, football would have to endure more scrutiny is a different matter of course.
    =====================
    Pas de progrŠs sans peigne.
  • Eurostar
    Eurostar Posts: 1,806
    Timoid. wrote:
    BTW: Does anyone seriously think Zabel took EPO once and then didn't touch another naughty substance for the rest of his career? He only didn't continue to use EPO as it didn't agree with him.

    First I thought, 'gosh, wasn't he amazing to have won all those green jerseys clean.' Then I thought he must surely have tried absolutely bloody everything. Am I right in thinking that sprinters find it easier to dope, because if they have a team able to get them near the front all they really need is a brief burst in peak power, which can be gained from assorted steroids etc? Recovery isn't much of an issue if you never go in any breaks, so perhaps you could leave the EPO alone. On the other hand I suppose you need to be fresh as a daisy when you start your sprint(s) every day.
    <hr>
    <h6>What\'s the point of going out? We\'re just going to end up back here anyway</h6>
  • timoid.
    timoid. Posts: 3,133
    Moray Gub wrote:
    Timoid. wrote:
    Moray Gub wrote:

    So you think David Millar should be banned for riding for GB even after having served his punishment ?

    cheers
    MG


    Got it in one.

    He's not welcome on the olympic team. He should not represent your country at the world's either and while you're at it ban him from future national championships.

    As for his trade team he can represent a mexican food chain if he likes. That's their decision.

    I think youre being a tad harsh he has served his punishment, i see no purpose in punishing him further by banning him from those events.

    cheers
    MG

    Not really. By doping he brings his nation into disrepute. He had to hand back his TT gold medal ffs. How awful for Britain is that? Part of competing in the WC is making your nation proud. How can you do that when you're sullied?
    It's a little like wrestling a gorilla. You don't quit when you're tired. You quit when the gorilla is tired.
  • moray_gub
    moray_gub Posts: 3,328
    Not really. By doping he brings his nation into disrepute. He had to hand back his TT gold medal ffs. How awful for Britain is that?Part of competing in the WC is making your nation proud. How can you do that when you're sullied?[/quote]

    He brought his nation not brings ............II still think your being harsh you obviously dont belive in rehabilitation or a chance to rectify your wrongs. I think Millar is a good ambassador for GB cycling at the moment i am happy to see him ride for GB he has done his time , he should be left to get on with his career and if that means reprsenting GB then fine.


    cheers
    MG
    Gasping - but somehow still alive !
  • What a farce. Rather than commend riders for having the decency to admit to having made a mistake we begin to ban them whilst the real cowards and cheats stay quiet and ride.
    Why on earth would a rider admit to doping now??? How are we going to tackle the issue of doping if we start banning the riders who are trying to be part of the solution?
  • dave_1
    dave_1 Posts: 9,512
    Timoid. wrote:
    I think that the rule should be that anyone who has doped cannot ride the world's and anyone currently under investigation cannot either.

    Valverde is not currently being investigated (AFAIK) so should be allowed to race. Neither is Kloeden.

    Di Luca, Petacchi, Piepoli should not be allowed on the start line. Zabel neither, but it must be consistent.


    BTW: Does anyone seriously think Zabel took EPO once and then didn't touch another naughty substance for the rest of his career? He only didn't continue to use EPO as it didn't agree with him.

    Yes Timoid, it seems odd that Zabel´s right hand man Aldag used EPO for 7 years while his mate was clean. Still, at least Zabel came clean and set an example. He should be allowed to continue in the sport
  • NervexProf
    NervexProf Posts: 4,202
    Dave_1 wrote:
    Timoid. wrote:
    I think that the rule should be that anyone who has doped cannot ride the world's and anyone currently under investigation cannot either.

    Valverde is not currently being investigated (AFAIK) so should be allowed to race. Neither is Kloeden.

    Di Luca, Petacchi, Piepoli should not be allowed on the start line. Zabel neither, but it must be consistent.


    BTW: Does anyone seriously think Zabel took EPO once and then didn't touch another naughty substance for the rest of his career? He only didn't continue to use EPO as it didn't agree with him.

    I support your point of view Dave - Zabel, to me is the complete pro rider -and all round through the season rider whose palmares are a testament to his devotion to our sport.

    I must commend his honesty in retrospectively admitting his once only transgression.

    Yes Timoid, it seems odd that Zabel´s right hand man Aldag used EPO for 7 years while his mate was clean. Still, at least Zabel came clean and set an example. He should be allowed to continue in the sport
    Common sense in an uncommon degree is what the world calls wisdom
  • top_bhoy
    top_bhoy Posts: 1,424
    Naively, I thought that Zabel was one of few who hadn't doped - to find out otherwise was a huge shock and disappointment. However, although he has confessed, he has only done it in the late twilight of his career at a time in which it didn't really affect his earning potential or his career winnings to date nor could it affect his TdF jerseys.

    If it was several years ago then that would be setting an example, following on from a series of confessions from Telekom teammates of that era, it was only a matter of time before the truth was out on him also, so it was hardly the act of a brave man - more damage limitation. Although at the end of his career, a ban would have been better served on him.