Starting out bike
bigdrew1
Posts: 353
Hey all. I am really considering starting do do a bit of XC riding. I have been riding trials (As in no seat, hopping around on rear wheel) for 2 years now but fancy doing something else along side it. So I suppose the first ting I will be needing is a half dedicated bike:)
I am working at halfords so I think a Carrera would be my best choice as I will get staff discount. I am 16 and don't have a great deal of money. The most I would be willing to spend would be abut £500. I Imagen I'd use the bike for cycling to school as well as riding trails.
I have just spotted the Decathlon Rockrider 8.1 So at the moment it is a toss up between that and a Fury
I am slightly inclined towards the Fury due to the discount I'll be able to get. They both look VERY similar the real differences I can spot are the LX drive chain oppose to the sram x.7 on the carrera and the clipless pedals on Decathlons offering .
So basically just wondering which of these I would be better off with? and is there anything that needs desperately upgrading on either of them.
Thanks for you help.
Andy.
I am working at halfords so I think a Carrera would be my best choice as I will get staff discount. I am 16 and don't have a great deal of money. The most I would be willing to spend would be abut £500. I Imagen I'd use the bike for cycling to school as well as riding trails.
I have just spotted the Decathlon Rockrider 8.1 So at the moment it is a toss up between that and a Fury
I am slightly inclined towards the Fury due to the discount I'll be able to get. They both look VERY similar the real differences I can spot are the LX drive chain oppose to the sram x.7 on the carrera and the clipless pedals on Decathlons offering .
So basically just wondering which of these I would be better off with? and is there anything that needs desperately upgrading on either of them.
Thanks for you help.
Andy.
0
Comments
-
These are the best specced bikes for 500 quid available. All I can say is have a test, and go with what feels best. Both superb, however the Fury has an u[graded Tora fork and a better frame.0
-
What is the difference between the forks? I am a little confused by the rockshox's site it doesn't give much away. I take it that the fury has a Tora 318 and the Rock rider has a 302? Dosn't put me any closer to knowing the differences though:(
I have always been lead to believe that shamarno shifting is the smoothest. Is this true or is the sram equivalent just as good?
I'll just add, I'm around 6 ft 3 ins..Don't know if this makes any difference.0 -
Tora 318 has a better damping unit with compression adjustment and lockout, just loclout on the 302. 318 lighter as well. SRAM/Shimano is horses for courses, both has fans, but I find Shimano to be the better bet, and more durable.0
-
Ok I think I'll go for the fury then as I will get discount. Is there anything on there that you would recommend changing fairly quickly or anything that is likely to brake or is it all going to last for a fair while?0
-
Possibly the crank and bottom bracket, and tyres, but apart from that just swap parts as they wear out.0
-
Ok thanks alot for your help. I think I will invest in one in a month or so.0
-
...and given your height id go for a 19/20" frame.Carbon 456... http://www.pinkbike.com/photo/8854609/0
-
I've just been thinking. Would it be worth paying the extra 100 quid for the basic boardman bike?
How much more bike would I be getting for the money. As far as I can see only a upgraded fork and the gears have been changed arround a little. Higher qualaty rear mech and a downgrade in the shifters. I think i'm pretty much set with the fury but if it is really worth the extra 100 I'd be willing to streach a little.0 -
Both are equally good value, you simply get a better bike.0
-
ok I think ill stick with the fury then and save my self 100.. Probably put it towards a wheel set or clip less shoes/pedals sometime in the future as these seem to improve the bikes the most.
I shall see how things go
Again, thanks for you help:)0