Signatures?

jamesthemadmansimpson · July 2007

indeed the lack of BBcode is rather annoying
its a shame we cant put images up
blah

but oh well

RobS · July 2007

im certain if they wanted to remove images, their is an option in the admin section to not allow the tag in signatures, and not dissable the entire BBCode. Not being able to quote is really a step backward in my opinion.

tag in signatures, and not dissable the entire BBCode. Not being able to quote is really a step backward in my opinion.

ricadus · July 2007

It ought to be possible to have 60x60 pixel (or thereabouts) sized images below the usernames in the author column.

I suspect some of those who moan about *any* pictures being included are simply scared of being caught forum-reading by their bosses, so are happy the pages currently have the character of an Excel spreadsheet as this camoflages their furtive theft of paid worktime hours.

ricadus · July 2007

p.s. I'm the boss here, so it doesn't count. :twisted:

---*SD*--- · July 2007

I thought the sigs were aloud to be 100 x 400 pixels...
Thats what the limit is on other 'future' forums

Steve Austin · July 2007

testing

---*SD*--- · July 2007

On http://forum.officialnintendomagazine.c ... 48874eb21b thats what the rules are... :?

miggillicuddy · July 2007

^^^ how did that link work but none of the others are?!

The lack of decent signatures is pissing me right off. People's signatures were the main way of recognising people on the old forum.

---*SD*--- · July 2007

You can just type the link in but not shorten it..
eg. www.google.co.uk

Signatures?

Comments

Categories