Bendy buses- just what we already knew

rothbook
rothbook Posts: 943
edited June 2007 in Commuting chat
Bendy buses 'double injury rate'

Bendy buses operate on 12 of London's 700 routes
Pedestrians in London are twice as likely to be hit by a bendy bus than any other bus, figures released by the Liberal Democrats show.
The Transport for London (TfL) statistics also showed that cyclists were almost three times as likely to be injured by a bendy bus.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6729963.stm

Comments

  • Hackbike 6
    Hackbike 6 Posts: 3,116
    Pedestrians are more likely to be hit by a bendy bus because they are stupid.
    Marvelous twelve routes and I bump into them more than once on my commute.Literally.[}:)]

    <font color="green"><font size="1">Hackbike 8 Commuting Debut 09/09/2006</font id="green"></font id="size1"><font size="1"><font color="blue">Dawes Audax 2006</font id="blue"></font id="size1"><font size="1"><font color="green"> New 20/09/2006</font id="green"><font color="red"> </font id="red"></font id="size1">
    <font color="blue">
    <font size="1"><font color="red"> Cycle Commuting since 1981 </font id="red"></font id="blue"></font id="size1">
    <font color="blue">
    <font size="1">Cycling Proficiency Test 24 May 1977</font id="blue"><font color="red"><font size="1"> (30 years ago)</font id="size1"></font id="red"></font id="size1">

    <font size="1"><font color="red"> Ride to work part 1 of 8 http://tinyurl.com/ypjapc</font id="size1"></font id="red">
    <font color="red"><font size="1">Ride to work part 2 of 8 </font id="size1"></font id="red"><font size="1">http://tinyurl.com/2jfagu</font id="size1">
    <font color="red"><font size="1">Ride to work part 3 of 8</font id="red"></font id="size1"><font size="1"> http://tinyurl.com/2jcldv </font id="size1">
  • mjones
    mjones Posts: 1,915
    Rothbook, as per the similar discussion in Campaign, care must be taken with these figures because they don't take account of exposure. The bendy buses are used on busier routes, so are more likely to meet cyclists and pedestrians. Let's be careful to avoid making the same mistake as P. Smith and his 'cyclists are a greater risk to pedestrians than WVM' statistics.

    <blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">Dismissing the claims the TfL spokeswoman said the data has been misinterpreted: "By definition they (bendy buses) encounter many more road users, not just cyclists and pedestrians, than many other bus routes in London.

    "It is not comparing like with like to equate these services on the busiest routes with quieter ones.
    <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
  • I love these free buses!
  • Hackbike 6
    Hackbike 6 Posts: 3,116
    haha![:D]

    <font color="green"><font size="1">Hackbike 8 Commuting Debut 09/09/2006</font id="green"></font id="size1"><font size="1"><font color="blue">Dawes Audax 2006</font id="blue"></font id="size1"><font size="1"><font color="green"> New 20/09/2006</font id="green"><font color="red"> </font id="red"></font id="size1">
    <font color="blue">
    <font size="1"><font color="red"> Cycle Commuting since 1981 </font id="red"></font id="blue"></font id="size1">
    <font color="blue">
    <font size="1">Cycling Proficiency Test 24 May 1977</font id="blue"><font color="red"><font size="1"> (30 years ago)</font id="size1"></font id="red"></font id="size1">

    <font size="1"><font color="red"> Ride to work part 1 of 8 http://tinyurl.com/ypjapc</font id="size1"></font id="red">
    <font color="red"><font size="1">Ride to work part 2 of 8 </font id="size1"></font id="red"><font size="1">http://tinyurl.com/2jfagu</font id="size1">
    <font color="red"><font size="1">Ride to work part 3 of 8</font id="red"></font id="size1"><font size="1"> http://tinyurl.com/2jcldv </font id="size1">
  • jedster
    jedster Posts: 1,717
    I take the point on needing to consider exposure and would also add that its probably better to think of accidents per passenger carried than per vehicle but...

    Surely it's obvious that bendy buses introduce additional risks:
    1. more likely to get trapped outside a bendy bus when the driver pulls out after you have committed to overtake
    2. left hook crush a la tractor trailer rigs
    3. more difficult for driver to observe all the other road user around his larger perimeter

    It would be amazing if they were not involved in more accidents, surely?
  • mjones
    mjones Posts: 1,915
    <blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by jedster</i>

    I take the point on needing to consider exposure and would also add that its probably better to think of accidents per passenger carried than per vehicle but...

    Surely it's obvious that bendy buses introduce additional risks:
    1. more likely to get trapped outside a bendy bus when the driver pulls out after you have committed to overtake
    2. left hook crush a la tractor trailer rigs
    3. more difficult for driver to observe all the other road user around his larger perimeter

    It would be amazing if they were not involved in more accidents, surely?
    <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
    I agree, there are good reasons to be concerned. But that still doesn't excuse drawing conclusions about relative risk from figures that don't take account of exposure. There may be a real problem hidden within those figures, but as presented they don't show it.

    Don't forget that something that is more obviously hazardous will encourage people to take greater care, so it doesn't automatically follow that there will be corresponding increase in the number of accidents when exposure is taken into account.
  • rothbook
    rothbook Posts: 943
    Good points well made mjones, ta.
  • mjones
    mjones Posts: 1,915
    <blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by rothbook</i>

    Good points well made mjones, ta.
    <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
    Cheers- anyway, we wouldn't want to infringe you-know-who's copyright on risk comparison would we! [;)]
  • Tynancp
    Tynancp Posts: 160
    given me a few frights this week, they weren't around last time I was cycling, from the back they look like a regular bus, I find out it's not when I start of pass it, if they do do something that involves it bending it can need some adjustment, not always on if you;ve got traffic on the other side

    yes, they more dangerous than regular buses for cyclists at least, right up there with those HGVs with rear steering, that might have been my nearest ever miss to a serious accident