Weighed power, a stupid metric?
ugo.santalucia
Posts: 28,235
The one used by Strava...
every time I do a time trial, it seems the weighed average is lower than the actual average by a few Watts, which seems absurd... almost as if I was so regular in my output, that I exceed the steady state...
The normalised power, as used by Garmin Connect and others, seems more realistic, being just slightly over the real average by a handful of Watts
Is it just me?
every time I do a time trial, it seems the weighed average is lower than the actual average by a few Watts, which seems absurd... almost as if I was so regular in my output, that I exceed the steady state...
The normalised power, as used by Garmin Connect and others, seems more realistic, being just slightly over the real average by a handful of Watts
Is it just me?
left the forum March 2023
0
Comments
-
Strava's "weighted power" is their own algorithm, not the one derived by Dr Coggan, which the Strava plugin Elevate (formerly known as Stravistix) uses.
Coggan's formula tends to give me higher values, last night's ~2 hour ride was 261 vs 253.
Elevate now has a beta desktop version of the plugin, just make sure you backup your Elevate ride history data, a recent release accidentally wiped loads of old data... Which takes an age to get back, as Strava limits apps to ~600 activities every 4-5 hours and there might well be an additional daily limit, getting back ~4300 when I remembered to continue the sync took several days!
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/elevate-for-strava/dhiaggccakkgdfcadnklkbljcgicpckn?hl=en================
2020 Voodoo Marasa
2017 Cube Attain GTC Pro Disc 2016
2016 Voodoo Wazoo1 -
There clearly is a bug of some sort... if my output was perfectly linear, then the weighed power should be = to the real power... any deviation should lead to higher weighed power than the real... so I don't understand how it can be lower... it just makes no sense as a numberleft the forum March 20230
-
Yes, Strava's weighted power is notoriously inaccurate. Their is various Strava support threads with people complaining about this. Strava claim there is nothing wrong with it.
It is generally 20-30 watts lower than the NP reading given by both of my power meters.0 -
You have a power meter, why do you care what Strava says it is?2
-
Weighed power is based on power data from the PM... it's a way to estimate the real effort involved... for instance if you go up and down a lot, you will find that the average power is quite low, but you are knackered... normalised power or weighed power gives you a better estimate than the real average. It's useful in TT to get an idea of how hard you have gone over different courses...joe2019 said:You have a power meter, why do you care what Strava says it is?
For instance in the hilly TT we did in March my average power was 255, whereas yesterday on a flat TT I averaged 275... however, the normalised values are almost identicalleft the forum March 20230 -
ugo.santalucia said:
Weighed power is based on power data from the PM... it's a way to estimate the real effort involved... for instance if you go up and down a lot, you will find that the average power is quite low, but you are knackered... normalised power or weighed power gives you a better estimate than the real average. It's useful in TT to get an idea of how hard you have gone over different courses...joe2019 said:You have a power meter, why do you care what Strava says it is?
For instance in the hilly TT we did in March my average power was 255, whereas yesterday on a flat TT I averaged 275... however, the normalised values are almost identical
Yes, of course, but you get a normalised power figure from your power meter, just wondering why you care what Strava says?
1 -
I was just wondering if it is just me, or this anomaly is in essence a problem in the algorithm…joe2019 said:ugo.santalucia said:
Weighed power is based on power data from the PM... it's a way to estimate the real effort involved... for instance if you go up and down a lot, you will find that the average power is quite low, but you are knackered... normalised power or weighed power gives you a better estimate than the real average. It's useful in TT to get an idea of how hard you have gone over different courses...joe2019 said:You have a power meter, why do you care what Strava says it is?
For instance in the hilly TT we did in March my average power was 255, whereas yesterday on a flat TT I averaged 275... however, the normalised values are almost identical
Yes, of course, but you get a normalised power figure from your power meter, just wondering why you care what Strava says?
Strata is a good archive of previous activities, much more accessible than Garmin Connect
left the forum March 20230 -
ugo.santalucia said:
I was just wondering if it is just me, or this anomaly is in essence a problem in the algorithm…joe2019 said:ugo.santalucia said:
Weighed power is based on power data from the PM... it's a way to estimate the real effort involved... for instance if you go up and down a lot, you will find that the average power is quite low, but you are knackered... normalised power or weighed power gives you a better estimate than the real average. It's useful in TT to get an idea of how hard you have gone over different courses...joe2019 said:You have a power meter, why do you care what Strava says it is?
For instance in the hilly TT we did in March my average power was 255, whereas yesterday on a flat TT I averaged 275... however, the normalised values are almost identical
Yes, of course, but you get a normalised power figure from your power meter, just wondering why you care what Strava says?
Strata is a good archive of previous activities, much more accessible than Garmin Connect
Fair enough.
0 -
I’ve got a number of rides in Golden Cheetah (same numbers derived from Wahoo head unit) where my NP is less than my average by a watt or too - as you said those rides where the effort is very constant. So it happens outside of Strava too. However I trust the numbers in GC.
I don’t have a link, but read somewhere that For anything less than around 20 odd minutes NP should be ignored, and av power is more telling. Over 20 mins, NP starts to be quite useful. I’ll see if I can dig it out. I think it’s those occasions, on shorter efforts. where NP can be quite a lot less that AV. So when measuring shorter intervals, for example always measure using AV power.
0 -
Blah! Blah! Blah! None of it gives you bragging rights down the pub / teashop / macchiolattecino coffee house. Not like MAX POWERRRRRRR.......
0 -
What he said ^^N0bodyOfTheGoat said:Strava's "weighted power" is their own algorithm, not the one derived by Dr Coggan, which the Strava plugin Elevate (formerly known as Stravistix) uses.
Coggan's formula tends to give me higher values, last night's ~2 hour ride was 261 vs 253.
Elevate now has a beta desktop version of the plugin, just make sure you backup your Elevate ride history data, a recent release accidentally wiped loads of old data... Which takes an age to get back, as Strava limits apps to ~600 activities every 4-5 hours and there might well be an additional daily limit, getting back ~4300 when I remembered to continue the sync took several days!
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/elevate-for-strava/dhiaggccakkgdfcadnklkbljcgicpckn?hl=en0 -
It is basically just a quadratic mean. It should never be less than the average. @ugo.santalucia explains why quite well why.BASI Nordic Ski Instructor
Instagramme0 -
https://help.trainingpeaks.com/hc/en-us/articles/218243287-Why-is-my-normalized-power-lower-than-my-average-power-davidof said:It is basically just a quadratic mean. It should never be less than the average. @ugo.santalucia explains why quite well why.
0
