BREXIT - Is This Really Still Rumbling On? 😴
Comments
-
It's alright, demand for foil will drop as there are no turkeys etc. requiring said foil for cooking.ddraver said:People were wondering what's next...
Do Waitrose Pies come in tin foil?
I doubt this is Brexit related anyway, it's more likely Covid related and all the anti-lockdown / anti-vaxxers panic buying hat making materials.2 -
shortage due to hat-making boom?TheBigBean said:
Relevance to Brexit?ddraver said:People were wondering what's next...
Do Waitrose Pies come in tin foil?0 -
"There's no truth to the rumour that there is a shortage of foil" said a government source with shares in foil manufacturers.*
*probably not true1 -
0
-
We're in danger of confusing passion with incompetence
- @ddraver0 -
A good bit of leftiebollox there as intrastats never included services, so was far from being the full picture.briantrumpet said:I like the last paragraph.
"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Didn’t she write that HMRC used changes to the Intrastat survey as (part of) an excuse for not providing business and service related data?Stevo_666 said:
A good bit of leftiebollox there as intrastats never included services, so was far from being the full picture.briantrumpet said:I like the last paragraph.
I know nothing about that survey, but it sounds like you’ve actually highlighted HMRCbollox doesn’t it?0 -
Not sure, but there are other ways that this data is collected. It is simply a case of ditching a superfluous EU compliance burden.pinkbikini said:
Didn’t she write that HMRC used changes to the Intrastat survey as (part of) an excuse for not providing business and service related data?Stevo_666 said:
A good bit of leftiebollox there as intrastats never included services, so was far from being the full picture.briantrumpet said:I like the last paragraph.
I know nothing about that survey, but it sounds like you’ve actually highlighted HMRCbollox doesn’t it?"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
Would you mind pointing me in the direction of one of the other reports. Ideally one with an executive summary.Stevo_666 said:
Not sure, but there are other ways that this data is collected. It is simply a case of ditching a superfluous EU compliance burden.pinkbikini said:
Didn’t she write that HMRC used changes to the Intrastat survey as (part of) an excuse for not providing business and service related data?Stevo_666 said:
A good bit of leftiebollox there as intrastats never included services, so was far from being the full picture.briantrumpet said:I like the last paragraph.
I know nothing about that survey, but it sounds like you’ve actually highlighted HMRCbollox doesn’t it?0 -
You could say that if you didn't read the letter, and only saw the word instrastat.Stevo_666 said:
Not sure, but there are other ways that this data is collected. It is simply a case of ditching a superfluous EU compliance burden.pinkbikini said:
Didn’t she write that HMRC used changes to the Intrastat survey as (part of) an excuse for not providing business and service related data?Stevo_666 said:
A good bit of leftiebollox there as intrastats never included services, so was far from being the full picture.briantrumpet said:I like the last paragraph.
I know nothing about that survey, but it sounds like you’ve actually highlighted HMRCbollox doesn’t it?0 -
Note the report itself but here is a decent explanation of where we get the info from:surrey_commuter said:
Would you mind pointing me in the direction of one of the other reports. Ideally one with an executive summary.Stevo_666 said:
Not sure, but there are other ways that this data is collected. It is simply a case of ditching a superfluous EU compliance burden.pinkbikini said:
Didn’t she write that HMRC used changes to the Intrastat survey as (part of) an excuse for not providing business and service related data?Stevo_666 said:
A good bit of leftiebollox there as intrastats never included services, so was far from being the full picture.briantrumpet said:I like the last paragraph.
I know nothing about that survey, but it sounds like you’ve actually highlighted HMRCbollox doesn’t it?
https://blog.ons.gov.uk/2021/05/14/trade-off-different-ways-of-measuring-imports-and-exports/"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
You may need to explain what your point is.kingstongraham said:
You could say that if you didn't read the letter, and only saw the word instrastat.Stevo_666 said:
Not sure, but there are other ways that this data is collected. It is simply a case of ditching a superfluous EU compliance burden.pinkbikini said:
Didn’t she write that HMRC used changes to the Intrastat survey as (part of) an excuse for not providing business and service related data?Stevo_666 said:
A good bit of leftiebollox there as intrastats never included services, so was far from being the full picture.briantrumpet said:I like the last paragraph.
I know nothing about that survey, but it sounds like you’ve actually highlighted HMRCbollox doesn’t it?"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
It's the bit where she says that the information is "readily available for trade with non-EU countries".Stevo_666 said:
You may need to explain what your point is.kingstongraham said:
You could say that if you didn't read the letter, and only saw the word instrastat.Stevo_666 said:
Not sure, but there are other ways that this data is collected. It is simply a case of ditching a superfluous EU compliance burden.pinkbikini said:
Didn’t she write that HMRC used changes to the Intrastat survey as (part of) an excuse for not providing business and service related data?Stevo_666 said:
A good bit of leftiebollox there as intrastats never included services, so was far from being the full picture.briantrumpet said:I like the last paragraph.
I know nothing about that survey, but it sounds like you’ve actually highlighted HMRCbollox doesn’t it?0 -
So not difficult to fix given we already have the systems in place. However my point was there is no need for duplication, which is effectively what intrastats was. And we now no longer need to do it, so makes sense to drop.kingstongraham said:
It's the bit where she says that the information is "readily available for trade with non-EU countries".Stevo_666 said:
You may need to explain what your point is.kingstongraham said:
You could say that if you didn't read the letter, and only saw the word instrastat.Stevo_666 said:
Not sure, but there are other ways that this data is collected. It is simply a case of ditching a superfluous EU compliance burden.pinkbikini said:
Didn’t she write that HMRC used changes to the Intrastat survey as (part of) an excuse for not providing business and service related data?Stevo_666 said:
A good bit of leftiebollox there as intrastats never included services, so was far from being the full picture.briantrumpet said:I like the last paragraph.
I know nothing about that survey, but it sounds like you’ve actually highlighted HMRCbollox doesn’t it?"I spent most of my money on birds, booze and fast cars: the rest of it I just squandered." [George Best]0 -
You are the only person who has mentioned retaining it, in your opposition to something literally nobody is proposing.Stevo_666 said:
So not difficult to fix given we already have the systems in place. However my point was there is no need for duplication, which is effectively what intrastats was. And we now no longer need to do it, so makes sense to drop.kingstongraham said:
It's the bit where she says that the information is "readily available for trade with non-EU countries".Stevo_666 said:
You may need to explain what your point is.kingstongraham said:
You could say that if you didn't read the letter, and only saw the word instrastat.Stevo_666 said:
Not sure, but there are other ways that this data is collected. It is simply a case of ditching a superfluous EU compliance burden.pinkbikini said:
Didn’t she write that HMRC used changes to the Intrastat survey as (part of) an excuse for not providing business and service related data?Stevo_666 said:
A good bit of leftiebollox there as intrastats never included services, so was far from being the full picture.briantrumpet said:I like the last paragraph.
I know nothing about that survey, but it sounds like you’ve actually highlighted HMRCbollox doesn’t it?
It shouldn't be difficult to fix, which i guess begged Thornberry's question as to why it hasn't been.0 -
-
I don't know who that is, but it's not true.ddraver said:Erm Rick...got some bad news...
The statement (from july) says "Those producers affected by these measures will be able to apply for recognition from today."
It's ending the fact that if it was recognised by the EU it would automatically get recognised by the UK (except it stays for NI obvs). Just adds a new layer of bureaucracy which is an expected part of Brexit.0 -
-
Ah, the old 'muck-shovelling Mick' stereotype. Very progressive. Hardly surprising though.rick_chasey said:0 -
-
He hates talking about his Irish ancestryrick_chasey said:It's not like Biden is sensitive about it at all.
0 -
skyblueamateur said:
He hates talking about his Irish ancestryrick_chasey said:It's not like Biden is sensitive about it at all.
He must be the only American who doesn't like talking about their ancestry.Ben
Bikes: Donhou DSS4 Custom | Condor Italia RC | Gios Megalite | Dolan Preffisio | Giant Bowery '76
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ben_h_ppcc/
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/143173475@N05/0 -
Ben6899 said:skyblueamateur said:
He hates talking about his Irish ancestryrick_chasey said:It's not like Biden is sensitive about it at all.
He must be the only American who doesn't like talking about their ancestry.
0 -
“New York has the haircuts, London has the trousers, but Belfast has the reason!0
-
tailwindhome said:
Maybe 'minus 4%' was the bit of the Brexit dream they didn't tell us about.
I wonder if Mr Bootle remembers that the UK was a member of the EU when Thatcher "radically improved the performance of the British economy".0 -
It's positive Covid news surely - only half as bad for the economy as Brexit.
BBC story here. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-590700200 -
kingstongraham said:
It's positive Covid news surely - only half as bad for the economy as Brexit.
BBC story here. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-59070020
But it's good news that Brexit is all over, remember.0